Win Rate should be Wins/(Wins + Losses)

DeviouslyCursed:     Please explain how a 120hz monitor provides any kind of a game advantage over a 60hz monitor. What could I be possibly missing in those extra frames per second?    When it comes to FPS games, all flat screens are inferior to CRT monitors. The draw time just isn't there. I'd still have one if they still made them. My old one died a long time ago. When I played CoD, I'd jump through a door, look at both corners (180 degrees apart) in an instant while in the air, and them kill anyone waiting. Sometimes two players, one hiding in each corner. They'd always ask how you can do something like that without an aimbot. My response was always "you have a flat screen monitor, don't you?" I'm not sure what the refresh rates of the monitors themselves are (probably 60 for CRTs), but regardless of what the monitor refreshes at, there is a noticeable difference between 60 FPS, 120 FPS, and 200 FPS. You want the highest you can get, BUT if the game is optimized for certain FPS (like the original CoD was) you want the highest of those FPS sets that you can manage. I think the one I used was 124, but it was a long time ago so I could be wrong (I think they were 60, 124, and 333). At the very least, that setting made you jump just a tad bit higher, and jumping over railings to staircases was a lot easier. Some jumps were impossible unless you were capped and solid at those FPS marks (like the roof of the back spawn building in POW camp).

DeviouslyCursed: