Major League Championship Series, Spring 2013
Дата: 23.05.2013 20:47:16
Katukov, on May 18 2013 - 18:01, said: May be it was already answered,
Just curious, what was the principal of matching team in preliminary?
I have(finally) looked into result table, and checked the challengers for 12 place.
Cazadores played against places : 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20 next battle against 18
Team Fail against : 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20 next battle against 1
starry night and co : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19 next battle against 7
Challengers are in places 12-14.
I do not care much, however could someone explain rules.
monster415, on May 20 2013 - 21:18, said: The point he was trying to make is that since there are only 12 rounds, comparing schedules of different teams shows that certain teams got an easier draw than others did. If the League had 19 rounds so that every team would be guaranteed to face each other at least once, there would be no arguing or complaining. However with only 12 rounds in addition to having teams relegated to Minor League, the 12 round system clearly appears to be flawed and benefits the teams that on paper appear to have gotten easier match schedules. Those who got a much tougher draw end up moving down, while those who got an easier draw remain despite earning the same number of points. Ultimately if WG wants to guarantee fairness then they need to have 19 rounds to avoid this conversation period.
Ivec, on May 21 2013 - 17:25, said: And then, they send those lucky teams to Ural steel where they get obliterated lol
Akiyama, on May 23 2013 - 00:14, said: I don't really understand the scoring system currently with the standings. After wins/losses and all that, and when it goes into battles won/battles lost.. is it based off win percentage or total wins? Because currently it's just sorted by least amount of losses.
/headscratch
Just curious, what was the principal of matching team in preliminary?
I have(finally) looked into result table, and checked the challengers for 12 place.
Cazadores played against places : 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20 next battle against 18
Team Fail against : 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20 next battle against 1
starry night and co : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19 next battle against 7
Challengers are in places 12-14.
I do not care much, however could someone explain rules.
Captain_Judo: There was no principal in scheduling. Scheduling was completely
random. As in traditional sports, it's common that, at the end of a
season, it becomes clear that one team had a stronger opponent
schedule than another. It's certainly a tough break 
This was also a result of removing June from the Spring season. The Summer season, on the other hand, will play out its intended schedule and allow all teams to play each other (at least) once.
This was also a result of removing June from the Spring season. The Summer season, on the other hand, will play out its intended schedule and allow all teams to play each other (at least) once.
monster415, on May 20 2013 - 21:18, said: The point he was trying to make is that since there are only 12 rounds, comparing schedules of different teams shows that certain teams got an easier draw than others did. If the League had 19 rounds so that every team would be guaranteed to face each other at least once, there would be no arguing or complaining. However with only 12 rounds in addition to having teams relegated to Minor League, the 12 round system clearly appears to be flawed and benefits the teams that on paper appear to have gotten easier match schedules. Those who got a much tougher draw end up moving down, while those who got an easier draw remain despite earning the same number of points. Ultimately if WG wants to guarantee fairness then they need to have 19 rounds to avoid this conversation period.
Captain_Judo: Ranking is determined by the following (in order of priority):
1. Points
2. Battle losses (fewest)
3. Battle victories (most)
1. Points
2. Battle losses (fewest)
3. Battle victories (most)
Ivec, on May 21 2013 - 17:25, said: And then, they send those lucky teams to Ural steel where they get obliterated lol
Captain_Judo:
Akiyama, on May 23 2013 - 00:14, said: I don't really understand the scoring system currently with the standings. After wins/losses and all that, and when it goes into battles won/battles lost.. is it based off win percentage or total wins? Because currently it's just sorted by least amount of losses.
/headscratch
Captain_Judo:
Major League Championship Series, Spring 2013