Stats and why they mean (almost) absolutely nothing

Garbad, on 20 July 2011 - 04:38 PM, said: I've said repeatedly overall stats are not that useful, nor are small sample sizes. You need to compare one tank with lots of games played to get a clear picture.
This shows your fundamental ignorance of stats. The 5% level of statistical significance does not mean 5% of the results are wrong. You are simply wrong.
Ha, the irony is you are one of the morons who doesn't understand stats. Look up the Central Limit Theorem. This is not an experiment.
hahaha, more "proof" that you have understood stats all along, amirite? I want you to walk into a stats department and tell the profs there that sample size has nothing to do with statistical significance.
In a nutshell, he doesn't realize that his program created a normal distribution, why that is important, or what his results prove. He is deep into stupidland, and doesn't realize it.
_________________________________________________
Fundamentally this is an argument of the educated vs. the ignorant. I'm sorry, but there is no nicer way to say this. You people who don't know shit about stats need to stop posting and acting like you do.