Pay to Play
Дата: 25.03.2018 17:09:45
ChEeSyBoOfS, on 23 March 2018 - 10:10 PM, said: Statistically I am a better player than all three of you so if you
don't mind I'll print your opinions out and wipe my arse with them.
Regards.vuque: First of all, that attitude is not welcome here! Just
because you have better stats, that doesn't give you right to
insult others. If you go into that road then someone else who has
better stats than you can come into the conversation and shuts you
down. For instance me, it seems like I have better stats than you,
so would you prefer me to have the same attitude towards you?
About the topic itself, I am sorry but before I see some replays about what happened in the battle, I can't really talk about your non-penetrating shots.
About the topic itself, I am sorry but before I see some replays about what happened in the battle, I can't really talk about your non-penetrating shots.
Jigabachi, on 23 March 2018 - 09:56 PM, said: 1. With that thread title you definitely won't attract the
Wargaming staff. Even if they cared about what's written in these
forums. Don't use terms you don't understand. 2. Yes, premammo is
still a problem. A well-known one. But it's also perfectly possible
to play without it. Not without drawbacks, but it's possible. 3.
Did you play those matches in a row or did you cherrypick them?vuque: 1. Well as a matter of fact he managed to attract me into
the topic. 2. We will work on the premium ammo, this was mentioned
in earlier Q&A's. 3. You have quite a good point but as
mentioned earlier, to reach a conclusion; we should also see
the replays in my opinion.
Pay to Play