Wargaming collapsing - Major staff crisis - Jahrakajin gone?

WindSplitter1, on 24 March 2018 - 06:58 PM, said:   I do not find this funny.   As others have said, there are WG Community Staff that cares and those who don't. The latter has been gaining ground rapidly these days.


Aikl, on 24 March 2018 - 07:04 PM, said:   Does 'care' cover those who opt to make friendly responses to carefully picked topics that have absolutely no potential to be controversial?   I'm surprised they haven't realized it's pretty obvious by now. Not that a few individuals should receive all the attention, but staff isn't often responding to 'controversial' topics. Lately there has at least been some activity in bug-related posts though, which is nice. Fair improvement from responding to very basic questions.


Jigabachi, on 24 March 2018 - 08:32 PM, said: ...said noone ever. Alternatively, we could simply add a bit of RNG to posting on the forums: Whenever you post something, you have a 10% chance to get a warning point and a 5% chance to get a ban right away. Would be quite nostalgic...


Aikl, on 24 March 2018 - 09:35 PM, said:   That may or may not be a feature still.   Anyway, I hope the staff catches the point here. Moderators should be part of the community, not mere banhammers (a certain mod's avatar comes to mind). That might help to make them appear more reasonable and not . Whether that is needed or not might be a matter of opinion, though I think most with a 'moderation history' would agree it is (deserved 'history' or not). Generally, not necessarily based on any individual case, I think 'being reasonable' is not a common trait among the moderation team as a whole.   Come to think about it, there was an article published on a well-known blog recently. It was about the behaviour of the moderation team on the NA forum. Surely the EU staff would prefer not to have a similar story about them published in the same fashion, and would prefer to become a tad more reasonable in the future. I'm sure the moderation team knows what I'm referring to.   On-topic: A trait of Jahrakajin was the ability to not give warning points for minor, unintentional, infractions. That was part of what made him appear sensible and 'good, but just'.