evilchaosmonkey, on 12 August 2020 - 05:08 PM, said: Nicely tried, but challenge failed due to poor attempt at
spin (take lessons). None of those are mistakes. The
EBR balance is not a great example - when did the EBR's get
introduced? The player base screamed game breaking on
day one. Credit where it's due WG does do some good things
to benefit the wider world. Sadly in my personal opinion outweighed
by everything else - but that''s just my opinion.
eekeeboo: They are mistakes by your category of what you classified as
mistakes above, you classified a mistake as a lack of ability to
adapt to change outside of the company control. 18:26 Added
after 0 minute
Erwin_Von_Braun, on 12 August 2020 - 05:10 PM, said: That's an incredibly long-winded non-answer to a question. I have
been playing this game for some years now & I have never
encountered a situation where the player must pay to facilitate a
change. When the camo system was re-worked, everything was adjusted
to suit - I even got my old camo back for long since sold tanks.
Now, in order to be even vaguely competitive, I must spend
literally millions of credits - how is that in any way fair?
eekeeboo: Answered in the other thread too, because I didn't have the context
to your original question. 18:32 Added after 7
minute
UntouchableRo, on 12 August 2020 - 05:19 PM, said: let's see! 1. Frontline was bugged from the start with an error
counting down the progress + cap possitions where people couldn't
be shoot and they could hold the base + tanks going under the map
beeing useless! 2. Races last year with the nasty bug if you died
you had to restart [even if it was so much tested, NOT]! 3. 6
nations when the database had issues counting the points! 4. That
invisible tanks in Road to Berlin? [or the bots that just stayed
AFK]! shall i add the chat issues? the cancell of last Halloween?
Unable to add tank when joining stronghold battles? Postpone
january campaign and it was announced 1 day before? Interface
issues after 1.1/ almost after each majore update there is an patch
a few days after solving one or the other! Thanks for adding copy
paste tanks [Primo victoria-Strv81 or heavy tank nr 6/Tiger 121 and
i got a lot more going on].... Remember the update 1.9 that took
hours more as beeing expected for the servers to start! More and
more, just did not write down at that moment! But i can't remember
one in the past year without issues/bugs! BTW there are still sites
that sell illegal mods, and it seems they work like a charm, some
say with the payed mods WG doesn't ban and some even assume the
developers get some extra money selling them aside [it's just
speculation]!
eekeeboo: And Frontline worked and was fixed the day after. Race event
that was again micro patched the day after. 6 nations was
webpage based not deveopment. Invisible tanks I didn't see but
you will remember the additional server due to the influx of
players experiencing lag (not invisible tanks). Cancel of
Halloween to stop people playing an unstable mode that wasn't
ready? January campaign added before (please actually read not
just complain). Copy and paste tanks as you put it are related
to your list how? Do you know how server updates work and that
no patch is guaranteed to work and you'll remember compensated
premium time? illegal mods will always be around, removing all
mods isn't the answer, fair play bans always in
place. Again you want to look for an argument and
failiure you'll find it no matter what, because you just sit there
waiting and counting them. And yet, none of them were PR
game ending disasters you claim.
Sesrex, on 12 August 2020 - 05:23 PM, said: Isn't it a little amateurish to try and single out users who
are dissatisfied and paint the picture that they are only two?
Because lets be honest, the overall picture is that
Wargaming EU staff are not taking players' feedback on board, and
as I had predicted over a week ago, the complaints that quite a
number of players had made were completely ignored by WG EU. And
despite your best efforts you are actually only reinforcing the
opinion of forum users that Wargaming are completely disconnected
from the opinions and considerations of players. Trying to
single out forum users, confrontational and demeaning posts etc.
also doesn't paint you in the best light does it? Of
course everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but don't expect
players to tow the party line just because you have to. Over
300 pages of complaints on the russian forums are testament enough
to the dissatisfaction of players with patch 1.10. Let's not
consider complaints on the EU forum.
eekeeboo: This overall picture is from who and where? I know feedback is
being passed on, but listening to feedabck and acting on it are
different things. I highlighted before the danger of falling into
the misconception. And I don't single out forum users, it's me
answering to every forum user I can who have a point, question or
want an answer. I know this seems odd, but this is how I've always
done engagement and you can check back when I was still a community
manager and eek walls of text were common. 300 pages and how many
are individual players?