Dongers=XXX1 kings of xxx it seems..
Дата: 26.02.2019 20:39:08
Jumping_Turtle, on 25 February 2019 - 06:31 PM, said: You could also explain to the reporters the meaning behind
it and flag it ia non offensive. They could even edit the
description to achieve that,. I am sorry but this is the easy way
out and the internet complainers ruin it for people who actually
care for the game and even get Wargaming sponsored events where
Vuque gladly joined us and had a blast. For sure there has to be
someone higher up the ladder who could tell this is all so
nonsense.eekeeboo: But as much as you can say "this is the reason it's not
offensive" if you have 1 person who has no context of the
forums.... In this case remove all context of the dingers and the
lovely community we have, now look at the word dong and what would
you think in-game? And as it stands the "higher up"
created the rules and that there can be no exception, more so when
you get to this stage.
KinkyTail, on 25 February 2019 - 06:41 PM, said: Ok, that is me out of the game. When a community manager and
a WG staff see no problem with D0NG but someone at support puts his
foot down and wont listen to reason there is something really wrong
with the people there. Well done for driving me away. Probably a
angry non paying costumer who got killed or yelled at are now
making me decide to stop playing. Well done for driving an paying
costumer away. #1399 eekeeboo: Please refer above, it's a plain rule and I know the context
but remove the context and you will have the issue you do with the
clan name. I wish you the best where you go, it's a shame to see
you go.
Long_Range_Sniper, on 25 February 2019 - 06:44 PM, said: Some will sneak through because you've got an inventive
playerbase of people who have to use initiative to play the game.
But you do have some known known's in the words of DR. If
you ignore what you know just because it didn't come through a
formal report process, what's the point in acting on things at all?
You still know offensive clans/names exist from reading this
thread. Maybe look at some of the free or business
messenger systems that allow the creation of generic access
names/numbers for multiple people doing work on a rota basis.eekeeboo: This is why the report function is so important for matters
like this and why some clans can slip through a rename with
inventive use of letters and numbers. And again without context,
this name definitely falls under the element of breaking the rules
clearly set out in the set. The work rota basis is fair and well
but the EN CM can't be expected to work 24/7, let alone for there
to be a member of staff available for the EU region on a 24/7
basis.
Enforcer1975, on 25 February 2019 - 06:51 PM, said: Imo the only way to make WG regret their decision......let's
all look for names that offend us and have them do the work. They
can do nothing about it since it is in their rules. eekeeboo: I can guarantee that will escalate the situation into a
direction you won't like. Be aware patience and willingness to help
extensively is exhaustive.
Dongers=XXX1 kings of xxx it seems..














