How is WG stealing our personal reserves time

HassenderZerhacker, on 29 January 2019 - 10:18 AM, said:   1- Reserves do encourage people to behave differently.
Interactions with other players confirmed this, and I sometimes behave differently as well. If the mathematic outcome in XP of 2 hours of play while yoloing in lights or shortening unfavorable battles is better than what can be expected from playing seriously, it means yoloing, suiciding is the rational decision because it maximizes the outcome for the player. That's how reserves encourage playing badly.   2- The measure of a per-battle equivalence of reserves should be based on the *average* duration of a battle, not the maximum time.   3- lost or won, disconnected or not, the active reserve's battle count should just decrease by one every time the "battle" button is pressed. incase of a disconnect, if the battle is still active, the player can of course reconnect to that battle and benefit from the reserve. If the battle ends before he can reconnect, of course the player should benefit from any reserves he activated for that battle.   The above would also avoid having reserves expire at different times. It's another minor annoyment when I press "battle" and 2 seconds before the battle starts a reserve expires.   and YES, as other posters noted, activated reserves are also a reason for players to not platoon or to not be available for clan battles.   we find more and more reasons why battle-count based reserves are better.