Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks

Дата: 17.01.2019 16:01:33
View Postsady3296, on 15 January 2019 - 05:48 PM, said:   No. Thats the result of the data. The fact that a tank has bad gun handling and bad lower plate  doesnt mean its an overall bad tank and needs a buff.

eekeeboo:   I didn't say it was bad, what I said was winrate and damage aren't the only things you judge a tank's performance on. Thank you for reading my replies and not just waiting for a chance to add another reply with your own opinion.   

View Postares354, on 15 January 2019 - 06:48 PM, said:   Hse gun was far superior to IS 4 gun, Is 7 gun, 705A gun, and you buff it more. Hes belly armor is now 5 mm thicker then most belly armor of Maus who goes 20. 

Is this reason of buff, and what reaon you have to not buffing TVP VTU, Tiger, T34-2 for YEAR, do tell us. 

eekeeboo:   ​You won't get a reason past what I've already given.          14:02 Added after 1 minute

View PostDr_Oolen, on 16 January 2019 - 11:03 PM, said:   Ill tell you what data WG is looking at :) They found out that 100% of shots that hit the floor of the tank penetrate, which is too big a difference compared to the 20% of shots that hit anywhere on the front of the tank. And because WG decided that if one (arbitrarily chosen) parameter contributes (in arbitrarily chosen statistic) disproportionatelly it has to be averaged out :) Thats why they dont buff floor on leopard, which also gets penned by 100% of shots, because rest of the tank also gets penned by close to 100% of shots, so all is alright comrade.   When it comes to aimtime and accuracy, WG arbitrarily decided that ruski tank should on average achieve 90% hitrate after it stops hull movement and starts aiming, but shoots within 1 seconds of stopping. Well, our underpoiwered ruski tonk probably hit only 85% of such snapshots, so comrades calculated that in order to reach 90% aimtime and dispersion on turret traverse need to be buffed.   TLDR: eekaboo is once again bullshitting everyone about WG and how they gather statistics, meanwhile he forgets to mention the only statistics they are looking at are the cashflow per week and goldspam per hour

eekeeboo:   I didn't forget, you presumed, just as you did for the rest of your post. But thank-you for providing what is clearly a well thought out and completely unbiased opinion. 

Реклама | Adv