Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Devs you need to sort this now if you have any idea of attracting and keeping new players!

Дата: 14.05.2011 14:40:02
View PostChuffy, on 14 May 2011 - 02:25 AM, said: I would like to see this sort of behaviour prevented in random battles.
I believe Platooning any Tier 1 vehicle with anything higher than a Tier 2 should be blocked by the game for Random battles.
Bringing a Tier 1 tank to a higher tier battle puts the team at a disadvantage. Fine if it's a Company battle, but this sort of stupidity ruins Random battle balance.

Vallter: It's an interesting suggestion. We will think about it.

View PostStoffy, on 14 May 2011 - 08:22 AM, said: I am actually a bit worried that this doesn't work properly.
*Edit*
As I have no clear idea what a tanks actual match weight is based on I tried using their average battle tier level as it seemed as a logical value to use as it would give heavy tanks a higher weight just as they are supposed to have and so on.
However, by using this value and adding up the two teams the team with the Cunningham lands on a total weight of 115 where as the other team lands on 121,5, so yes, the team without the Cunningham is indeed a lot stronger even when using "average battletier".
Would be nice to get an explanation from the devs regarding this...

Vallter: The matchmaker is based on tanks characteristics and not the Tiers. This means that different tanks of the same Tier can have different matchmaking weight.

View PostStoffy, on 14 May 2011 - 09:07 AM, said: Platoon's does apparently not add any extra weight to the calculation at this point (some text in red about it not being active any more in the matchmaking thread).

Vallter: No, it adds some extra weight, because platooned members have an advantage comparing with other players.

Реклама | Adv