EU Questions & Answers
Дата: 15.12.2011 09:25:42
Trent, on 14 December 2011 - 09:55 PM, said: No! Don't listen to him, he just wants to have his rep at -500 back
again, that's why he writes posts like that
(Linking to this thread never works
properly anyway, lol)
Just put big GOSSIP FROM WARGAMING.NET HQ in your signature and refer people to that whenever they say "...but in your previous post you said...". (And I'm only half joking here.)
Question:
"Battle tier" term in matchmaking table seems to confuse many people (who apparently can't understand the difference between "tank tier" and "battle tier") and whenever I use the phrase in its proper meaning I always feel obligated to explain this lest I become misunderstood.
Wouldn't it be better to change it to something like "battle level" or "battle stage" or something like that?

Just put big GOSSIP FROM WARGAMING.NET HQ in your signature and refer people to that whenever they say "...but in your previous post you said...". (And I'm only half joking here.)
Question:
"Battle tier" term in matchmaking table seems to confuse many people (who apparently can't understand the difference between "tank tier" and "battle tier") and whenever I use the phrase in its proper meaning I always feel obligated to explain this lest I become misunderstood.
Wouldn't it be better to change it to something like "battle level" or "battle stage" or something like that?
Overlord: 1. I have always said that the dates given on the forums should be
viewed as draft plans and gossips. Their purpose is to keep the
most impatient of players updated on our schedule.
If the info goes to the main portal and subsequently is proven to be wrong, that's the problem to complain about. And we are indeed terribly sorry for that.
2. If it really helps, we can rename it to whatever we want.
If the info goes to the main portal and subsequently is proven to be wrong, that's the problem to complain about. And we are indeed terribly sorry for that.
2. If it really helps, we can rename it to whatever we want.
