Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

EU Questions & Answers

Дата: 17.10.2011 12:21:37
View PostWriothesley, on 17 October 2011 - 10:32 AM, said: Regarding the T110 - can you share what idea developers have on the play style?
What I'm afraid is, that if the commanders copula will stay there, the play style will be "bring IS-7/E-100".
T110 will be just other example of T29 second turret issue - but multiplied. Because the play will be:
1) go up the hill
2) show the weak spot
3) boom get few shoots, killed commander
4) show gun - if you have any hp left at all
5) aim, probably get 1 more shoot
6) shoot
At least in case of T29 the "ears" were shown together with gun, and are also much smaller.
And additional question is:
Is it normal and approved by WG standards, that WG employees fake their "Reputation" score here on forum?
Today morning, I made screen:
poniedzialek_rano.JPG
and suddenly now it is:
Reputation: 496
poniedzialek_rano_po_zmianie.JPG
What I want to add is, that this is not "troll" question - lot's of people come together to check, if http://forum.worldof...post__p__978497 this post is true. Unfortunately, seems that kurkusmaximus was right.
How come now we are able to trust your employees?

Overlord: 1. T110 will get decent hull armor and good gun along with mobility that is fairly above average, so all in all in it is going to be "heavy-medium" tak. The play style will differ a lot from tank destroyer mode of T30. And yes, commander's cupola at the top will be a weak spot.
2. Do not see how it is related to the development / game.

Реклама | Adv