Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

EU Questions & Answers

Дата: 11.05.2011 13:40:26
View PostNosferat1, on 11 May 2011 - 07:26 AM, said: How about instead of making polls and so on, add the option for players,especially those who payed to be able to select what maps they want shuffled.
Maybe you are arty and do not want to go in urban warfare in the Himmelsdorf map.
Maybe you do not like camping that much and do not want Malinovka in your map cycle. Would this be too hard or too much to ask from the game designers? Since some of us pay, we would like to see some improvement. You know, a better overall balance, a system that selects those that payed from those who did not pay and offer them better overall matches.
I want more hair on my head, not less from the constant frustration that this game gives me. From the noobs(by that I do not mean newb, newbie and noob are 2 very different things),flamers,leavers, people who are afk all game. A more balanced matchmaking, more maps, the option to choose your own map cycle.
After people select the maps they like, you can make an in game poll by viewing the statistics, what maps are played the most. Let us choose, and then improve or balance even more the maps that are played the most, leave or delete the rest and add new ones, let us chose again, then decide again and so on.

Overlord: We will consider this option, but I can't pormise anything at this stage.

View Posteviljezza, on 11 May 2011 - 08:21 AM, said: When is the earliest we can expect the stats for the E-series?

Overlord: In summer.

View PostStubentiger, on 11 May 2011 - 08:27 AM, said: Did you increase the accuracy of most 8.8 and 10.5 german guns compared to 0.6.3.11 in the release version of 0.6.4? If not, why did you nerf the ROF of these guns (e.g the ROF of the 8.8/L56 of JgdPz IV)?
At least in the test versions of 0.6.4, the accuracy of most 8.8's has been raised a little.

Overlord: See the finalized patch notes of v.0.6.4.

View Postblilov, on 11 May 2011 - 08:38 AM, said: I have a question. Let's say I have T34 with mounted rammer and etc. When we get the M103 will it have the same equipment as well? And will the premium T34 have them?

Overlord: Installed equipment and modules in depot for the vehicles affected by the revisions will be sold at their buying price.

View PostHaineko, on 11 May 2011 - 09:14 AM, said: I have noticed on the revised Tech Trees that the link from Easy 8 to M10 has been removed, and I am guessing that it was due to poor balancing options for it at such a high tier, but I want to know, is there any way to get that from M4 planned?
Considering my only reason for playing the american medium line was to actually go from E8 to M10 my entire gameplan and all time I put into it is completly wasted as of now.
EDIT: How come the 76mm M1A1 ,in-game, is vastly superior to the 75mm KwK 40 L/48, while during the war the M1A1 performed worse than the KwK 40 due to using non-capped rounds?
Also, was the M1A1 balanced with the 75mm KwK 42 L/70 in mind, or is this a simple screw up from your side?
At last but not least, the undergunning problem of the M4A3E8. I have not got it yet, but at tier 6 we should not have to go with a gun that performs the same as the prior (M4 Sherman) tank, but simply with a higher ROF. Are there any plans to change this incredibly, exscuse me for my choice of words, stupid decision?

Overlord: 1. There is a link to M36 instead.
2. Perhaps if the question were put in a more tactful manner, there would be an answer.

View PostKaap, on 11 May 2011 - 10:39 AM, said: Overlord,
Having just checked the patchnotes. The developers stated that German tanks were not quite on par with their Russian and American counterparts. It was promised the team would look into that. Quite some buffs were done on the test servers and things looked good.
Suddenly most buffs were reverted and the German tanks received a ROF nerf across the board.
If it was admitted the German tanks needed help, why were they nerfed instead?
Regards,

Overlord: Inernal testing and ST stage showed with reworked hitboxes most of the German tanks gained the necessary performance impact. Wait for the release of the update to check it yourself.

View PostSzalona, on 11 May 2011 - 12:29 PM, said: Hmm... if that option would be implemented ,then maybe you can give it to premium users, and thanks to this platoons could be free? :)
This would allow to increase population, and premium users would get really nice feture, which completly is not effecting other players (at least not so much as platoons).

Overlord: Who knows, who knows ... ;)

View PostStanislavKus, on 11 May 2011 - 12:30 PM, said: Was the lower front plate on KT as it is now really 150mm thick?
And why was it nerfed to 120mm?

Overlord: Yes, correct. The change was made according to reference data.

View PostSzalona, on 11 May 2011 - 11:17 AM, said: You will live longer to waste more ammo on bounces. In order you not to became bancrut the ROF is lowed so you will not loose so much money.
Edit. forgot question. KW-3 performance compered to all other T6 tanks is OK?

Overlord: Not exacty, could be better actually.

View PostKeulz, on 11 May 2011 - 11:26 AM, said: 1 - does :
- Углы склонения орудий уменьшены на 4 град
means that we won't be able to lower the gun as much as before ? Why ? Is it for historical reasons or balancing ones ?
Because this is the main difference in gameplay between US and the others. Without that, there isn't much difference...
2 - don't you think the nerf of the 105mm US won't be compensate by the little buff in rof on the T34, and make its average stats even worse ?

Overlord: 1. For both reasons, including balance sake.
2. Only maximized setups have real impact on overall performance. So the adjustment of 105mm gun won't affect it much.

Реклама | Adv