EU Questions & Answers
Дата: 01.05.2011 21:40:51
Nathaniak, on 29 April 2011 - 01:57 PM, said: New question.I know that the rules do not permit team-kills, and that bans are applied for suspected deliberate team kills.
However, I would like to know two things:
1. If you fire a deliberate 'warning shot' near an ally, but do not hit him, is this grounds for a ban?
2. If you fire a deliberate 'warning shot' that hits by mistake, would it be treated as an accidental or deliberate team hit/kill?
Also, could you please answer my previous question on command tanks?
Overlord: No. You did no damage.
You did damage. There is no way of determining that you meant to just miss him so it is treated as any other scenario where someone shoots a team member, it will be examined under the normal criteria so if it was right at game start with no enemy nearby it will be judged as deliberate for example.
You did damage. There is no way of determining that you meant to just miss him so it is treated as any other scenario where someone shoots a team member, it will be examined under the normal criteria so if it was right at game start with no enemy nearby it will be judged as deliberate for example.
theta0123, on 29 April 2011 - 07:54 PM, said: i am dissapoint, M48 would have been betterAnyway my question=
-How much EXP is it required to research the KV-13 from the KV-1s and/or T34-85?
Overlord: 63-65k.
Azmodanrom, on 29 April 2011 - 10:11 PM, said: what is the least used tank from the normal tech tree (not
premiums)? if u can tell us...Overlord: It used to be M40/43 pre-wipe, haven't gathered post-released data
yet.
eviljezza, on 30 April 2011 - 06:55 AM, said: Overlord, I can'tremember who but I think it might have been you
that said the ROF nerf for the KT 105 L/68 is to encourage the use
of the 105 L/52 (which is a stupid reason) but then why don't you
do something for the IS-3's BL-9 and encourage the use of the
D-25T?I am sure you can understand now why the community scream "Russian Bias" because stuff like this adds fuelto the fire
Overlord: This is under consideration as well, howeber rebancing of D-25T
will cause chain reaction and require several further adjustments,
unlike L/52 which is used only on 2 tanks.
ghoty, on 30 April 2011 - 08:12 PM, said: Is wargaming sometimes messing with probabilities in the game
without applying a patch?I'm just wondering because lately, I was set on fire many times and I have NOT encountered such things before. I didn't change tank or playstyle.
(could name other things, but thats the most obvious to me atm)
It makes me go paranoid and I really would NOT like being toyed with.
Overlord: Short answer is: NO, we don't.
Szalona, on 30 April 2011 - 09:14 PM, said: Hi Overlord, 1st it was nice to meet you during battle 
I have question, why you consider such balance fair - map Pagorki - as you can see one team go T-54 and T-44, second one didn't get ANY medium! How exacly you think this balance is fair, specially on this map, where the hill is 100% win?
http://img13.imagesh...i/shot066d.jpg/
Overlord: Is it me or there is no T-54 at all here?
For this particular battle the balance is not that bad.
For this particular battle the balance is not that bad.
rodier, on 01 May 2011 - 02:49 AM, said: ETA for clan wars is still mid may? thanks.Overlord: Yes.
tabal5000, on 01 May 2011 - 08:03 AM, said: Planning to make changes for IS-4 since it's going to be moved to
tier X? Or will it stay as it is?Overlord: There will be changes to all tanks touched by the planned revision.
Thor_Hammerschlag, on 01 May 2011 - 11:15 AM, said: Will the StuG E100 be implemented with the E-series?Overlord: It will be added later.
ArmorShark7, on 01 May 2011 - 11:44 AM, said: Some questions about the new tanks from the revised trees:1. Is the JagdPanther II a JagdPanther with a rear-mounted superstructure? Is it based on the original Panther chassis or the E-50's?
2. Is the STUG E-100 going to be armed with a 150 mm gun like the E-100? Given its weight, will it play like the American T95?
3. Will the M103 and T110 be able to mount 120 mm and 155 mm guns like the current top tier USA heavies?
4. Will the turreted tank destroyers be able to mount upgradeable turrets like tanks do?
5. Is the T25-2 a turreted TD based on the T25 medium tank?
6. Since the T95 GMC is the real thing, and the T28 GMC is a TD your team of tank experts designed, what is this "T28 (prototype)" on the T30 line? Is it some sort of turreted predecessor of the T29 series of heavy tanks?
7. Will the Tier X IS-4 be armed with the 122mm BL-9 and no longer be able to mount the IS-7's gun?
8. Will the SU-122-54 also be armed with a 122mm gun and not with the BL-10?
Overlord: 1. It is based on E50's chassis.
2,3,8 The exact module setups are unknown yet.
4. Most likely - no.
5. Yes.
6. T28 prototype is probably the weakest part of the US tech tree from the point of historical accuracy, it is 90% our invention.
7. Most likely it will get an improved 122mm.
2,3,8 The exact module setups are unknown yet.
4. Most likely - no.
5. Yes.
6. T28 prototype is probably the weakest part of the US tech tree from the point of historical accuracy, it is 90% our invention.
7. Most likely it will get an improved 122mm.
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers