New tier 9 mediums battle ballance
Дата: 05.01.2011 11:50:55

There's no burning bug with the panther2, but what we should point out is that while T-54 will bounce horrid amounts of shells from the front, panther 2 is made out of balsa in comparison. Add the fact that the total height of T-54 is 2.4m, and the only reference to panther 2 i can find showed 2.99. In game though, i can poke my entire turret over a T-54 wreck and still fire, so i guess it's like 3.5-4 in WoT? All in all, the front presents a huge target, and engine is easy to hit. This is horrible enough, but i guess we can work with it. But THEN:
Engine: V-55U HP:680 Chance of fire:10%
Engine: Maybach HL 234 P 50 HP:980 Chance of fire:20%
So, without even mentioning the engine to weight-ratio or anything, you straight-up made the T-54 engine 100% better than the Panther 2 engine. Half the chance of catching fire. Half. Do you even have a reason for this, or is it just so you can supertest the T-54 without burning up?
Don't get me wrong, i mean no offense. But if you add all theese bonuses up it becomes ridiculous very fast, and right now it just seems like the T-54 is the dev's pet project to relax and pwn some noobs with while at the office or something.
Overlord: And despite of the above at supertest Panther II proved to perform
better against T-54 with win ratio 52-48 (both fully upgraded, 100%
crew, no modules, no gold ammo). Pershing was in the lead of T-54
as well with 54-46 ratio.
Regarding "U" letter in the engine description, it means modernized with reworked fuel system. Guess, that's why it got lower chance to catch fire.
Not all of our team are playing Soviet tanks, many drive exclusively German vehicles, US tanks are far less popular at the moment.
Regarding "U" letter in the engine description, it means modernized with reworked fuel system. Guess, that's why it got lower chance to catch fire.
Not all of our team are playing Soviet tanks, many drive exclusively German vehicles, US tanks are far less popular at the moment.
