WG, just what the *edited* are you doing?

TsundereWaffle, on 23 December 2017 - 09:10 PM, said: Rear-mounted Turret Tank Destroyers The SU-100 line is getting reshaped into assault TDs. Mobile and bouncy, they’re destined for mid-to-close combat. It’s where they can angle to deflect shells and leverage maneuverability to perform quick assaults, dismantling enemies with high-DPM guns. Although Wargaming is working out the final setup, you can expect several big comebacks and a major reshuffle at Tiers IX–X: SU-122-54 gets removed. SU-101M1 and SU-101 return to Tiers VII and VIII, respectively. Object 268 Variant 4 will replace the Object 263 at Tier X, while the latter will move to Tier IX. So, this garbage was announced on WG Fest. I already made a previous topic about why these changes are just absolutely stupid, and there are other topics as well. On the Russian forum WG received an insane amount of complaints because the changes were simply put retarded. And now for some reason WG still decides, even after saying themselves the changes were bad, to introduce them anyways. Well then, WG's answer to solving the issue of a very unpopular, underperforming line, nerf the tanks and introduce a really crappy T10 TD, and hell, lets remove the SU-122-54 whilst we're at it, nobody would mind that right? Just... what are you doing? Also, excuses for the massive gap at the top of the page, for some reason I can't seem to get rid of it...