IS-6 HD Model Changes and Clarification
Дата: 07.03.2016 10:42:41
MrConway: As there were some concerns regarding the changes to the IS-6
model with the HD upgrade, headquarters have provided us with
this clarification. You can find all the model changes, and
explanations of how they will affect the vehicle's performance,
below. We will be watching this thread closely for your
feedback, please keep it constructive! Dimensions Let’s
start by comparing the dimensions in the frontal view.
Previous model:
New model:
Pros and cons regarding
changes: (+ improved; = has not changed; +/- partially improved,
partially worsened, with the overall balance as the result; -
worsened): + Complaints that "cupolas have become bigger"
are groundless and false. The cupolas have in fact become
smaller. + Complaints that "turret roof has become bigger" are
groundless and false. The area of the roof has become about 1.5
times smaller. = Complaints that "lower glacis plate has become
bigger" are groundless and false. The size of the lower glacis
plate only changed insignificantly (it has become a little bit
smaller). = Complaints that "the tank has become bigger" are
groundless and false. The vehicle height was reduced a bit. At the
same time, the clearance has increased by a small margin. Hull
height has remained about the same, while turret height has
decreased. + The driver’s hatch has become a little bigger. +
The gap between the track and the fender has been decreased a bit.
+/- Tracks have become noticeably bigger and now comprise
external elements of the suspension. In this case, it is hard to
say whether it’s an improvement or a nerf—it can be either,
depending on the situation. Armor Protection The
values displayed in the images DO NOT factor in normalization. It
should be understood that these values are given for comparison
purpose only (previous/new model). They cannot be used as a basis
for conclusions on whether a particular gun would penetrate a
certain area of the vehicle’s armor. Previous model:
New model:
Pros and cons regarding
armor protection: (+ improved; = has not changed; +/- partially
improved, partially worsened, with the overall balance as the
result; - worsened): + Armor thickness of the top
section of the upper glacis plate has increased a bit. + Armor
thickness of the driver’s hatch has increased significantly.
+ Armor thickness of frontal curving sections of the turret
has slightly increased. + Thickness of the armor strip at the top
section of the upper glacis plate has increased. + Armor thickness
of the lower glacis plate has increased a bit. + The part of the
fender that was visible in the frontal view (marked with
arrows) was due to a faulty model and could be penetrated due to
over match. It was removed. = Armor protection of the cupolas has
not changed. = Turret inclination has improved, but it will have no
effect due to over match. +/- The armor strip between the lower
glacis plate and the upper glacis plate has become wider, but armor
thickness of the stripe has decreased. - Armor protection of the
bottom most section of the lower glacis plate has decreased.
Previously the glacis plate was "broken" in sections, now it has
the same slope angle, and, consequently, the same effective armor
thickness across the whole plate. An important aspect that
deserves a separate mention: Armor protection behind the gun
mantlet in the previous model:
Armor protection behind the gun mantlet in the new model:
As you can see, the
size of the embrasure behind the gun mantlet has decreased more
than twofold! Therefore, the area where the gun mantlet overlaps
the turret armor has increased significantly, with a resulting
armor thickness of 300 mm or more in these sections. Turret
armor protection is displayed in the next images, with areas of
effective armor less than 220 mm highlighted—these areas can be
viewed as weak spots compared to the rest of the turret’s armor.
Previous model:
New model:
The armor protection
pattern is displayed this way due to the complex structure of the
surface. This variant will be easier to understand, since we are
only interested in weak spots. You can see that the
previous model had one large weak spot to the left of the gun. The
new model has two such areas— to the left and to the right of the
gun, but each of them is slightly smaller than the weak spot in the
previous model. Moreover, the new model does not have a weak spot
in the gunner’s sight. In general, the turret armor protection
remained roughly the same: The addition of a weak spot to the right
of the gun is fully balanced by a smaller embrasure for the gun and
reduced roof and cupola areas. Side Armor Previous
model:
New model:
Summary on side armor: +
Main side armor plate has become a bit thicker (142 mm instead of
138 mm). + A stripe of reinforced armor has been added (screen of
56 mm + side armor of 136 mm). + The prominent part of the fender,
which could be penetrated with over match, was removed. - Effective
armor thickness of the side frontal plate has decreased a bit,
which is balanced by the fact that the effective armor thickness of
this area in the frontal view has increased slightly.
New model:
Pros and cons regarding
changes: (+ improved; = has not changed; +/- partially improved,
partially worsened, with the overall balance as the result; -
worsened): + Complaints that "cupolas have become bigger"
are groundless and false. The cupolas have in fact become
smaller. + Complaints that "turret roof has become bigger" are
groundless and false. The area of the roof has become about 1.5
times smaller. = Complaints that "lower glacis plate has become
bigger" are groundless and false. The size of the lower glacis
plate only changed insignificantly (it has become a little bit
smaller). = Complaints that "the tank has become bigger" are
groundless and false. The vehicle height was reduced a bit. At the
same time, the clearance has increased by a small margin. Hull
height has remained about the same, while turret height has
decreased. + The driver’s hatch has become a little bigger. +
The gap between the track and the fender has been decreased a bit.
+/- Tracks have become noticeably bigger and now comprise
external elements of the suspension. In this case, it is hard to
say whether it’s an improvement or a nerf—it can be either,
depending on the situation. Armor Protection The
values displayed in the images DO NOT factor in normalization. It
should be understood that these values are given for comparison
purpose only (previous/new model). They cannot be used as a basis
for conclusions on whether a particular gun would penetrate a
certain area of the vehicle’s armor. Previous model:
New model:
Pros and cons regarding
armor protection: (+ improved; = has not changed; +/- partially
improved, partially worsened, with the overall balance as the
result; - worsened): + Armor thickness of the top
section of the upper glacis plate has increased a bit. + Armor
thickness of the driver’s hatch has increased significantly.
+ Armor thickness of frontal curving sections of the turret
has slightly increased. + Thickness of the armor strip at the top
section of the upper glacis plate has increased. + Armor thickness
of the lower glacis plate has increased a bit. + The part of the
fender that was visible in the frontal view (marked with
arrows) was due to a faulty model and could be penetrated due to
over match. It was removed. = Armor protection of the cupolas has
not changed. = Turret inclination has improved, but it will have no
effect due to over match. +/- The armor strip between the lower
glacis plate and the upper glacis plate has become wider, but armor
thickness of the stripe has decreased. - Armor protection of the
bottom most section of the lower glacis plate has decreased.
Previously the glacis plate was "broken" in sections, now it has
the same slope angle, and, consequently, the same effective armor
thickness across the whole plate. An important aspect that
deserves a separate mention: Armor protection behind the gun
mantlet in the previous model:
Armor protection behind the gun mantlet in the new model:
As you can see, the
size of the embrasure behind the gun mantlet has decreased more
than twofold! Therefore, the area where the gun mantlet overlaps
the turret armor has increased significantly, with a resulting
armor thickness of 300 mm or more in these sections. Turret
armor protection is displayed in the next images, with areas of
effective armor less than 220 mm highlighted—these areas can be
viewed as weak spots compared to the rest of the turret’s armor.
Previous model:
New model:
The armor protection
pattern is displayed this way due to the complex structure of the
surface. This variant will be easier to understand, since we are
only interested in weak spots. You can see that the
previous model had one large weak spot to the left of the gun. The
new model has two such areas— to the left and to the right of the
gun, but each of them is slightly smaller than the weak spot in the
previous model. Moreover, the new model does not have a weak spot
in the gunner’s sight. In general, the turret armor protection
remained roughly the same: The addition of a weak spot to the right
of the gun is fully balanced by a smaller embrasure for the gun and
reduced roof and cupola areas. Side Armor Previous
model:
New model:
Summary on side armor: +
Main side armor plate has become a bit thicker (142 mm instead of
138 mm). + A stripe of reinforced armor has been added (screen of
56 mm + side armor of 136 mm). + The prominent part of the fender,
which could be penetrated with over match, was removed. - Effective
armor thickness of the side frontal plate has decreased a bit,
which is balanced by the fact that the effective armor thickness of
this area in the frontal view has increased slightly.IS-6 HD Model Changes and Clarification














