Ural Steel List of cons and pros from position of player

Carmon, on 20 September 2012 - 10:33 AM, said: Hi , Mo
You know I really like the job you are doing but really the Ural Steel went like it is written. I really liked the way that EU was on us at Koln but in case of Ural Steel it was completely different. I know Bump had problem with our passports but it is not our fault that the news/time of qualifying tournament were that short comparing to the time we needed to get at Russia at Ural Steel. Not only us had problems but americans also said that they had visas just day before a departure. As long as I remember german citiziens have to get a passport at age 18 so they had passports and still had problems with visas.
I did not want to criticise everything but in my opinion when I and my colleagues from teams from EU are threated like they are threated is a moment to step and say a few words. I hope You understand that is just show out what went wrong.
Why is it on forum ?
Because first Ural Steel looked almost the same from relation of my friends from SBP, PTS or PAD from last year. They say it is Deja-VU. Maybe now the topic will be seen and something will change which I hope for.
The reason why esport community is growing is that a lot of people is spending a free time on work called ESL or making the esport teams. You can ask everyone at PL community how much work was done by Devil, me and rest of admins to introduce people to ESL. Now PL community has a biggest section on ESL (compared to the number of people playing) and also very skillfull. I hope the work I done will not go down because I'm no longer an admin after the decision of ESL.
Best Regards,
Carmon