Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

New Efficiency Rating formula

Дата: 28.05.2012 18:21:25
View PostPasschendaele, on 28 May 2012 - 03:29 PM, said: Dear LiannaSilverWind, in my opinion you just had to fix the formula reducing factor of capture points from *150 to *75.
(and obviously decrease the parameters for example. great player = 1350 instead of 1500).

LiannaSilverwind: Dear Passchendaele, dear friends, fellows, guys and girls!
Personally I find both old and new wot-news formula deeply flawed. No, I do not offer any new formula. I just do not consider that one being as useful as some people think, that's my humble personal opnion - hence my signature.
Using logic and arithmetics everyone of us can find out which vehicles are optimal for "farming efficiency" and which vehicles or playstyles should be avoided if you care about efficiency.
I read this thread regularly and I'm glad to see many different opinions, ideas, calculations and statements. It's good thing we're able to discuss important things (nearly) without flaming each other.
I'd like to offer one more question: do you sing in the shower room? If you do, do you care about the guy's in the house nearby opinion about your singing?..
That's why I'm so surprised that so many people take some unofficial rating as heavenly truth, base their tactics on it or decide to accept/decline people into their platoon/company/clan using just one formula that is rejected by WG officials (RU forum Devs Q & A).
I'd like to thank everyone for his/her opinions. Let's go on! :Smile_great:

Реклама | Adv