Chat Issues - 24/01
Дата: 27.01.2018 12:21:55
Iulian_ro, on 27 January 2018 - 10:06 AM, said: So first you threaten Angel_Arrow with 'moderation
actions' because he somehow insulted you, even if i fail to see
where he insulted you. And now you threaten me with a ban or what?
Just because i have the nerve of being ''surrounded by a cloud of
negativism'' and tell you that in my opinion WG Paris fails really
bad at doing their job? Because i am 'salty'? Yeah cry me a river
for hurting your feels, you think this a SJW meeting where everyone
is being nice to everyone or what? You think that people should be
compassionate and congratulate you for doing your job bad? Wake up
to reality: in all professions in this world customers are upset
when you fail to deliver good services. And they get even more
upset when they feel that you are not even care about them and just
take their money for a job not well done. All your income is
coming from the game, without this game would be also no
merchandise and other sources of income. So pay attention to the
damn game and make it work. I think i can say that i and most of
your players customers just want to have a good online game
experience. People who actually pay you 10 euro per month to enjoy
your game, also expect that game to be fully functional. And
chat/contacts are a major component of a online game.
Numbers? What numbers are looking good now? The income from your
european cash cows players?Kandly: I see you still don't get it, but ok. Angel_Arrow insulted
the World of Tanks team several times, I never said he insulted me.
In fact, his statement about me was getting close to being a
compliment instead, saying that I was sent to the topic because I
can get a lot of followers due to my live streams and contact
with the community. I was actually touched to see that even in such
a negative post, he didn't insult me once. He did insult
our developers in various ways, though, which also qualify as
WG staff, naturally. Of course I understand you want to have a good
experience and that is exactly what I want as well. I don't want us
to be false in our communication on the forum and I never censored
anything. I brought the problems to light every single time and
made it easy for everyone to access the information. I've been
active in various threads regarding this and I gathered the
feedback carefully. We did our best to help you, but you need to
let us help you, because we are the ones who have to filter through
the insults in order to provide our developers
with on-point information. It's simply not lucrative to
be angry at each other, so let's work together instead. That last
sentence was kind of disappointing to read, but I expected such a
reaction unfortunately. I will not respond to that, but what I
meant by "numbers" was: metrics that show the stability of this
particular feature.
Chat Issues - 24/01