Дата: 04.06.2014 12:13:31
Xino9922, on 04 June 2014 - 10:06 AM, said: Yes, it is historically accurate. Especially for planes,
both the axis and allied usually had victory marks showing the
number of confirmed kills they had. It was quite common among the
axis tankers as well, while it wasn't that usual among the allied
tankers. Still existed though, but I call [edited] on stars on the
barrel... that is probably completely fantasy, at least I do
believe so. Never seen anything like it in my some 7 years
studying military literature on Soviet tanks. EDIT: I don't
think Chinese tanks had that kind of victory markings either. I
don't know the Chinese tradition when it comes to victory markings
though, so I don't know. Same goes for the Japanese. A red hatchet
as a victory marking, seems quite like a complete fantasy. I don't
believe the Japanese had any tradition with victory markings on
tanks, since they had very few tanks. The Japanese tanks never had
any great successes, and I don't think they used victory markings
at all. Besides, the usual victory marking would
usually be the symbol of the faction that the destroyed enemy
belong to, impaled in some way or another to indicate that the
enemy was destroyed. It could also be a black or white image of an
enemy vehicle, though white is bad because it makes your tank
easier to spot while camouflaged or during a night assault.
Hunter1911: Throughout the history of WWII there was quite a lot of
inconsistency and confusion regarding the application of the
camouflages and other markings. Therefore in that regard we have
quite a lot of freedom in utilizing different marks as a visual
track of your efficiency displayed on your in game vehicle.