WG really need to stop adding too OP tanks
Дата: 24.03.2016 15:57:19
breeeze, on 24 March 2016 - 01:47 PM, said: As much as I agree with you on most points, you simply
cannot deny that the E5 is OP now, it has no downsides, very strong
and troll hull armour, near impenetrable turret, good speed and
good gun. WG has even confirmed the buff was "unintended". It was a
very well balanced tank before the buff, now it's just plain OP, as
is the IS-3, OI Exp, IS-6 and many other tanks that WG just refuses
to balance or even acknowledge their inability to balance them
properly.Ectar: It's powerful head on I agree and I own the tank myself, but
for some reason I can't get into playing it. I remember
playing it on it's first version however and felt it was more
broken then, I think it was all I played on the demo accounts
we had available at the time as it's agility was crazy before it
got it's terrain resistance increased. The reason I don't
want to say "OP" is because I find an IS-7 head on and and E-100
head on to be equally powerful and both have similar weakspots
(lower front plate). All 3 are tanks I only really want to trade
with if I'm in one of the others. A hulldown IS-7 is an absolute
swine to shift without flanking support or arty, similarly an e100
who knows how to angle and protect the turret weakspots is a pain
in the butt. The change to the top machine gun turret made it
stronger yes, but it's not like top tier matches are filled with
nothing but T110E5's and nothing else. Regarding the
unintentional buff, I've heard this myself and if someone can
provide me a source other than an external fansite, I'll flag this
on up the chain to see when it will be corrected.
WG really need to stop adding too OP tanks