WG really need to stop adding too OP tanks
Дата: 24.03.2016 15:57:19
breeeze, on 24 March 2016 - 01:47 PM, said: As much as I agree with you on most points, you simply cannot deny that the E5 is OP now, it has no downsides, very strong and troll hull armour, near impenetrable turret, good speed and good gun. WG has even confirmed the buff was "unintended". It was a very well balanced tank before the buff, now it's just plain OP, as is the IS-3, OI Exp, IS-6 and many other tanks that WG just refuses to balance or even acknowledge their inability to balance them properly.
Ectar: It's powerful head on I agree and I own the tank myself, but for some reason I can't get into playing it. I remember playing it on it's first version however and felt it was more broken then, I think it was all I played on the demo accounts we had available at the time as it's agility was crazy before it got it's terrain resistance increased. The reason I don't want to say "OP" is because I find an IS-7 head on and and E-100 head on to be equally powerful and both have similar weakspots (lower front plate). All 3 are tanks I only really want to trade with if I'm in one of the others. A hulldown IS-7 is an absolute swine to shift without flanking support or arty, similarly an e100 who knows how to angle and protect the turret weakspots is a pain in the butt. The change to the top machine gun turret made it stronger yes, but it's not like top tier matches are filled with nothing but T110E5's and nothing else. Regarding the unintentional buff, I've heard this myself and if someone can provide me a source other than an external fansite, I'll flag this on up the chain to see when it will be corrected.