Update 1.14 CT2 - Field Modification - General Feedback
Дата: 22.07.2021 19:35:39
Bucur03, on 22 July 2021 - 04:17 PM, said: Be careful cuz they give warning or ban, they don't accept
criticism just "positive feedback".Dwigt:
methoz, on 22 July 2021 - 03:44 PM, said: Let's lie about 70-75% satisfied players. BTW - I wonder - #1 WG is
trying to destroy game#2 WG developers are drunk and therefore inventing absurd / bad things?
Dwigt: Well no one got banned on the forums because he wasn't positive I
can assure you. Big difference between negative feedback and
toxic/unconstructive 
both comments fall under the third
category and will not help either of us.
both comments fall under the third
category and will not help either of us. snowlywhite, on 22 July 2021 - 04:34 PM, said: because you still want to measure the dimensions of the
disaster before implementing it? And walk back on some
modifications when the uproar is too big? what credibility
do you expect WG to have? "5% of the ammo is gold"? Sorry...
p.s. - no offense; I know you're not responsible for what's
implemented or something.Dwigt: And non taken It's not about measuring the
disaster or testing the water. That would probably be
during sandbox. We see if it the general concept works and
then what big changes could be done at this early concept stage.On
CTs we go into more details and specifics but sometimes that is not
enough.Yes we can still take step backs, even when it goes live.As
for the credibility, as long as we are trying to include you in our
development process and feedback gathering, trying to improve our
methods of gathering feedback, our presence here and on all
different channels insuring a healthy communication we are working
this credibility. We know that you the community, request X Y Z
from us but there are many factors and aspects that are not clear
from your perspective that make it hard for us to implement or
change them. I understand some suggestions and
decisions can be frustrating but if we are asking you to share
your feedback and opinion it is because we want it to reach our
decision makers and merge it to the rest of the feedback we
gathered elsewhere. Good luck and thank you in
advance! 
It's not about measuring the
disaster or testing the water. That would probably be
during sandbox. We see if it the general concept works and
then what big changes could be done at this early concept stage.On
CTs we go into more details and specifics but sometimes that is not
enough.Yes we can still take step backs, even when it goes live.As
for the credibility, as long as we are trying to include you in our
development process and feedback gathering, trying to improve our
methods of gathering feedback, our presence here and on all
different channels insuring a healthy communication we are working
this credibility. We know that you the community, request X Y Z
from us but there are many factors and aspects that are not clear
from your perspective that make it hard for us to implement or
change them. I understand some suggestions and
decisions can be frustrating but if we are asking you to share
your feedback and opinion it is because we want it to reach our
decision makers and merge it to the rest of the feedback we
gathered elsewhere. Good luck and thank you in
advance! Update 1.14 CT2 - Field Modification - General Feedback