Sandbox 2021: Get Ready for New Tests!
Дата: 05.02.2021 20:26:07
Max_Calibre, on 05 February 2021 - 02:53 PM, said: Revamped Crew 2.0 This alone all by itself will destroy all
of wargame hard work over the years to improve WOT just so
guaranteed to lose 50% or far more of the regular players
that are now playing on the EU servers why? it has taken
me 7 long, long years to get most of my crews onto 4
skills some 5 skills from Commanders to Loaders costs me a S--t
load of XP and Gold not to mention 7 years of playing hard and
skillful as possible to get them where they now are ~ not including
all the Reward Girls with x2 free perks from the Campaigns which
are like Gold dust and involve months and months and more months of
frustrating missions (now for what? Crew skills are as
Important as the Vehicles in the game (some may say more so) but
has probably has cost me so much more than paying for a new Premium
Tank, or many Premium Tanks so if Wargame f--- this up which
would be incredible stupid of them (surely not? then
Dwigt: Let's not assume and start speculating on what is going to
happen.We're offering you a chance to test what's coming so why
start speculating now and worrying about something that might not
even come or that you might enjoy?We already said in the past that
IF Crew 2.0 is going to be released, there will be a proper
compensation mechanic and we'll make sure that you don't lose your
progress and investment.Stay tuned, more articles will come and you
be take part in the sandbox and have a say in the final decision.
Don't waste it
Zamieszki, on 05 February 2021 - 03:01 PM, said: a survey after 5 games? ok, so crew rework will be cancelled, mark
my words.Dwigt: A bit too soon to start judging. Go and try the changes first
maybe?
Maki711, on 05 February 2021 - 03:06 PM, said: A disastrous game changes and bunch of PR talk from the Staff...
Completely out of reality like almost every patch or suggested
change...I really cannot remember when there was a patch where i would praise WG... The only good thing that happened in last few years is the reduction of minimap spam...
Dwigt: I mean if asking you to join a sandbox server, try the changes,
fill a survey is considered to be PR talk... I don't know what else
we could do to involve you in the development process.
Ragnaguard, on 05 February 2021 - 03:20 PM, said: Will break it to u in portions in case i did not made my
point understood from a dev/moderator point of view..... Like the
last one?You mean when you didn't like the HE changes last year and
we decided not to go with the planned changes? u decided not
to go with the planned changes last year to do what? apply them
this one? Nerf lights?they were nerfed already. You feel they
weren't nerfed enough?pretty sure u missed my NOT in my op
sentence...... the most anticipated patch was the one that took
lights from t5 and drove em up to t10... nomatter the fact that
people in the sandbox back in the day (search ur news to check when
as i am too bored to do it) told u not to nerf the lights , u DID
nerfed em , ruining something that was meant to be one of the best
updates in wot...... Maybe with the HE changes, thing will change a
bit. Don't you think?the problem is that there is absolutely 0
trust in what u think balance is , so the real question is will it
be for good OF GAMEPLAY or u will screw this one in the name
of monetizing ur game? If, we decide to add those
changes on the live server, we will then consider other
mechanics. We can not change everything at once. One step at a time
would help us get better results and help us find solutions and
improvements to others aspects if needed.rework the major
problems then before introducing more... u even read forums? fix
cars, gold spam and add moreto personall rewards in terms of exp
and credits after battle... reward players for playing their tank
roles so we do not see lights trying to play snipers full of gold
in any level, or heavies running uphills for 4 mins (pretty much
when game ends- and i do not mean fast one but u know type 5's or e
100's or similar) ... reduce arty to one per team , and balance the
weight of each team by skill also (a feat u could implement in
finding platoonmates).... SOLVE what exists, and then implement
what u like... start in the correct order..... got it dwigt? u seem to miss the problem! ur focused more to the tree than the forest..... not sure if its done on purpose or not, but u miss the point
Dwigt: So now SPGs and HE are just a couple of trees? Yes we are aware of
your other demands. Some of it might come maybe a bit later,
some of it is just not doable from our perspective. 1- Last
year's changes were different and we it was clearly said that we're
not going through this proposal because YOU didn't like it and
we're going back to the drawing board. Those new HE changes looks
very promising.2- For some people in the community, nerfing EBRs is
removing it from the game, for others is maybe removing their
cannon, but in reality stats are way more different than sentiments
and yes, we did not want to kill an entire line, we nerfed them in
one of the recent updates. People complain that EBRs shoot HE on
the move right? Don't you think that this HE rework might affect
EBRs? Maybe you'll answer that question after the sandbox.3-
Removing SPGs or reducing it to 1 per team is not something we want
to do. What we want to do is to move from its negative aspects and
change how players perceive it and interact with it. 4- We're
not implementing something new (SPGs or HE) but SPGs and HE
spam exist and we're trying to deal with it based on your
requests and feedback.
Misago, on 05 February 2021 - 03:24 PM, said: Aaaaand a nice dodge around the premium shell and OP premium
tank question by our team from cold belarus, these corporate shills
are at their best today!!!! What this is gonna do is force
even more players to use gold against heavily armored enemies,
which, of course, is good for a certain greedy game developer we
could mention. Yay, more gold spam! We totally needed that!
Also, I will take bets right now that crew 2.0 is gonna do what
equipment 2.0 did: Sneak in a way to make equipment just a bit more
expensive and mandatory. Slow down things for non-whale customers
to keep badgering them for that credit card info. Make crew skills
a bit more essential, to get people to pay for crew boosts etc.
And the player you quoted seemed to say you promised not to
nerf lights, even though they are pretty damn useless now (except
the russian ones! What coincidence!) God, I keep wondering
if being Wargaming staff on this forum is kinda like being press
secretary for that orange just kicked out of the white house.
Dwigt, if you know what you are saying is BS, but Wargaming is
holding you hostage, blink twice!Dwigt: No trust me, I'm pretty much optimistic about what's coming. I wish
I could share more info now, but I can tell that CCs and CMs
(Community) were involved in that process.That's a not a way
to avoid special shells or premium tanks
We're taking it one step at a time so we don't create
more problems. HE and SPGs have their negative
points and we want to address them. After that we have a better
view on addressing premium tanks (or other tanks) and other
mechanics. In Wednesday's stream with RagingRaptor, we were
discussing what's coming and he gave a perfect example to describe
the upcoming changes. As an engineer, you have two ways of dealing
with a problem. You can just change everything at once or maybe
take one element at a time, test it, change it and then put it back
in the system and see how it works and how it will affect the whole
thing. See you on the sandbox!
INFERNO1892, on 05 February 2021 - 04:45 PM, said: So we gonna lose all our crew members we worked so hard to train
all these years and in which we invested our money, time and
effort?Dwigt: Please let's not just post random stuff. At least wait for the
sandbox to try it then feel free to share your opinion on
those changes?
SnowWeasel, on 05 February 2021 - 04:52 PM, said: Let's give WG the benefit of the doubt....Oh they may read them,
laugh, and then blow their noses on the feedback and throw it away.Dwigt: Look certain aspects of the game should change but some of them
come from the community.EBR nerf, SPG, HE Spam. Yes there are other
stuff as well that you constantly ask us to change.We don't want to
remove EBRs or SPGs so we decide to tweak them in a way that
players who enjoy playing those types of vehicles can still enjoy
them and players who are annoyed by them can If you have
the chance to test those changes why waste it?
Ragnaguard, on 05 February 2021 - 04:58 PM, said: what will happen to a tank with 6 skills per crewmember? will i get
the equall crew members , or just a commander with lets say 2-3
perks? (see wow for example)........ or each tank will have a
commander and seperate crew tanks armoured warfare style?)
why they not trying to tell us what they plan to do? instead they
have what they want ready and they throw us the "sandbox" so that
we can tell them how they "fixed" it...... i see no
patchnotes (even in a preliminary state)..... what they fear to
share? Dwigt: Are you serious?It's not even a patch yet! We have articles
coming to explain what's is going to happen on the sandbox servers
first. THEN, IF we all agree on those changes, we will release
other articles with what was confirmed and how it will be
implemented, then there's the Common Test.. Not hiding
anything!
zentor, on 05 February 2021 - 05:23 PM, said: I really like where this is going... About 2 years ago WG started
to listen to community and are trying their best - less OP tanks,
less OP premiums, much free stuff and they really emphasize
everywhere how important it is for them to listen to our feedback.
Sure, they can not satisfy everybody, but changes they made were in
the right direction, although with minor issues (like not giving
free demount kits for all old equipment when equipment 2.0 came, or
the map ban feature that works for no aparent reason only for
standard battle and not encounter). I think that special ammo
rebalance (should be nerf really) is more important that these
changes, but at least they know that special ammo is also a problem
and want to deal with it later. Better late than never Dwigt: Thank you for saying that! I get that we don't like change in
general or maybe want to change other elements of the game but
at least give it a try (not you Zentor
)
Zwooop, on 05 February 2021 - 05:50 PM, said: Regarding Crew 2.0 what will happen to: T-34-85 Rudy, with
the special dog Szarik Primo Victoria T1-LPC, the offspring tank
T42, with «the boys crew» and «the seven team» And there are
probably lots more + special crew bought/rewarded separately.
Will there be a refund if crew that people have grinded or
bought suddenly is removed from the game ?Dwigt: Too soon to start talking about refunding crew members. We did not
forget about them. Most likely special commanders and crews will be
merged or transformed in a way that you don't lose them. I
repeat, if those changes go live, we want to make sure you don't
lose your progress.
cosssma, on 05 February 2021 - 06:12 PM, said: we said ebr is bad we said equipment 2.0 is bad u didin t even
listen 2 us so why shoul we tes sand box!?!?!? this game is broken
with ebrs 3 arties and unbalanced mm u can do wahtever u want is
uselessDwigt: EBRs were nerfed. Not enough? Stats will show. Forums impressions
are not enough to decide. HE changes might help with balancing EBRs
and the "shoot on the move" aspect.I don't want to discuss
Equipment 2.0 here but a lot of players agreed with the changes
during the sandbox rounds and we made sure that you don't lose your
progress. Did you participate in that last one?I encourage you to
do so and have a real taste of what's coming.
Sandbox 2021: Get Ready for New Tests!














