FIoris, on 21 August 2015 - 03:07 PM, said: Thank you for your answer and of course apology accepted. So
far I myself like the new map, because I think it has lots of
potential. Imo there is one really bad thing about it, and thats
the bidding system, but this has been brought up a couple of times
before. A clan holds a nice number of battles and suddenly is
attacked by a bidding alliance and loses everything instantly. Say
you hold 8 provs, and you get attacked on all, then you can
realistically only hold 2 of those. Whats worse is that you get no
warning if they bid in the last turn, so you cant counter bid. This
really needs to be addressed. One thing that fits the bug
reporting topic: names when zooming out are picked very
arbitrarily. Take The Netherlands for example on 3 different zoom
levels. Once you start zooming out less city names appear on the
screen. The further you zoom out the more arbitrary the cities
shown become. Tilburg, Venlo, Goes.... not the largest cities in
NL. Where is Eindhoven for example? And then in the 2nd picture,
Utrecht... OK, but Delftzijl??? Why not just show Amsterdam. And
then if you zoom out even more it only shows Zwolle. No offense to
the people living there but lol

. While it is mostly a matter of aesthetics it does look
a bit dumb. And doubt this is only the case for NL.

Decept1on: I do not mean any troll here, but isn't that the point of
the bidding system, making the map more dynamic? There is no
restriction on how much provinces you can hold, so you can extend
as much as you want but you always have to keep in mind that you
have to defend all of them. Maybe a defending big could be tweaked,
I'll forward the feedback. As for the name of the provinces,
it makes sense I'll report it.
Revel7777, on 22 August 2015 - 07:10 PM, said: Hello i am not sure it is a bug or a feature but when it is
a feature a explainition would be nice. Today as I tried to move
our attack i could not attack all provinces around me and i do not
understand why as you can see our province have 5
possible moves, but avalible was only three, why we could not
attack Mjölby, Linköping or Kristinehamn???? Also when we
just look the pur province with out division moving the arrows in
this three provinces are dark, have anyone the same problem?
Regards Revel7777
Decept1on: What Couruin says is correct.
Coruin, on 24 August 2015 - 04:07 AM, said: Just noticed something very vrong on this screenshot. OM had 7
battles at the same time, nothing new with the new rules of the
Global Map. But what bothers me is the rating calculations for the
battles. Every battle the defending clan has same rating changes,
no matter of the opponent(+6/-9), yet the opponents have different
values, but BIGGER if the attacking clan has LESSER clan rating,
for example BGTF(1000 rating) has (+18/-12). In other words the
better clan will lose less in case of defeat, than the weaker clan.
Any explanation for that case? The provinces you are
unable to attack are locked by enemy division with Bomber squadron
for 2 turns.
Decept1on: Yes, basically this is the principle of the Elo rating, if
you are a big clan attacking a weak clan you will not gain anything
by winning, while if a weak clan wins against a big clan then the
rating goes up much higher. (Unless I didn't understand it
correctly).