Subversions feedback

godmonkey, on 16 October 2013 - 12:18 PM, said: First of all a clarification would be in order. Are these things going to suceed automatically or is there a % chance of the attempted action succeeding?

For the features themselves the issue with them:

Provocation : Rarely something you want to incite on an enemy except to block an attack rout but that can be achieved with the railwars option as well. In general perhaps the least broken option of the ones in the list. A feature of limited use and most clans would probably rather use it on themselves in order to prevent them from being wiped off the map as enemies cannot attack. This can be heavily abused by larger alliances however.

Railwar: Very nice concept and it would work best if it would only apply to provinces that share borders. You could not block the entire enemy province from manouvering but they could not move on your provinces. More balanced this way.

Sabotage: Unless this is extremely expensive this will be one of the most broken features in this update. By paying gold you will get an autowin, okay that is bad. Then imagine an alliance with 5 clans using this feature on an enemy clan and all of their active stacks are suddenly in the reserve and the entire clan got wiped from the map without a single battle being fought. DO NOT ADD THIS TO THE GAME PLEASE.

Annhilation: This feature is broken and should not be added. Combined with the ability above this gives a smaller alliance the possibility to wipe any clan off the map in one day. Bigger alliances can keep your HQ permanently off the map. There is no point in this feature.

Counterspy Termination: Nothing wrong with the Spy VS Spy feature. This one is okay and not imbalanced.

Do the guys who come up with this stuff even play CW?