Object 777 Version II Review: The Third and Final Expedition Reward Tank
Дата: 01.06.2020 14:38:13
SiNiNeN, on 30 May 2020 - 09:35 AM, said: I like this tank..and picked it up..Ofc it just like normal tier IX
Soviet heavy,and i have all but dual barrel tier IX Soviet tanks at
my garage,so i know how to play whit this tank..It is really well
balanced and thats why i picked it up(don`t like OP tanks at all..i
have couple them at my garage..and they stay there for a reason.)
Turret is not great,but it work just fine..like this tank all round
does..Great work WG i hope that all new tanks are balanced like
this at the future.. Played 33 games so far on 777 and I can say
that the tank is actually better then it looks on paper. Its kind
of mobile for a heavy tank. Comparable to the Amx M4 51.
Decent in sidescraping. Armor will bounce a lot, only the flat
280mm left und right of the gun can be sometimes frustrating
against high pen/heat rounds. The gun is pretty average.
Feels sluggish on lower range but can actually hit a lot while
moving and turning. Got mine down to 10,5s reload which is ok. Imo
its as good or even better then Ae Phase 1. *Edit Note, the
high of the tank is pretty low. Keep in mind that it´s not always
possible to use it on specific positions such as windows on maps as
Kharkow or Himmels. The altitude of your gun isn´t high
enough.
Immensive, on 30 May 2020 - 03:40 PM, said: I took the Char, purely because I already had the Phase and have nearly 24k bonds. 3k more isn't much use to me, and won't buy much in the bond shop. I'm still waiting for the new bond shop tanks that they promised us that never came.
RedJester, on 30 May 2020 - 02:01 PM, said: No thank you to Tier 9 Reward tanks (only). Give players options like last year to get regular tier 8 premium tanks like Emil 1951, which can be used in FL, and are full premiums unlike these useless Tier 9s which are only playable in Randoms, have no credit making ability and don't unlock higher tier tanks (T10s). I already have AE Phase 1 from last year, and its collecting dust in my garage. I have no choice but to wait and get mediocre amount of bonds for my tokens this year. Last year's Emil 1951 is very useful in FL, and I wish WG hadn't nerfed the FL rewards so much this year.
L0rd_0f_War, on 30 May 2020 - 11:22 PM, said:
Actinid:
Thanks for your feedback =).
Thanks for your feedback =).
Immensive, on 30 May 2020 - 03:40 PM, said: I took the Char, purely because I already had the Phase and have nearly 24k bonds. 3k more isn't much use to me, and won't buy much in the bond shop. I'm still waiting for the new bond shop tanks that they promised us that never came.
Actinid: It will come. Just a bit more patience.
RedJester, on 30 May 2020 - 02:01 PM, said: No thank you to Tier 9 Reward tanks (only). Give players options like last year to get regular tier 8 premium tanks like Emil 1951, which can be used in FL, and are full premiums unlike these useless Tier 9s which are only playable in Randoms, have no credit making ability and don't unlock higher tier tanks (T10s). I already have AE Phase 1 from last year, and its collecting dust in my garage. I have no choice but to wait and get mediocre amount of bonds for my tokens this year. Last year's Emil 1951 is very useful in FL, and I wish WG hadn't nerfed the FL rewards so much this year.
Actinid: As, you said the tier VIII vehicules were a pretty common rewards
by now. We wanted to try something different that could be more
attractive for some players than another tier VIII.Thanks for your
feedback it's appreciated.
L0rd_0f_War, on 30 May 2020 - 11:22 PM, said:
Actinid:
Object 777 Version II Review: The Third and Final Expedition Reward Tank