Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
dance210
Skirmish 11
arrow
23.03.2015 01:31:10
 
Subject: Skirmish 11
Link on message: #8729695

View PostBastabeard, on Mar 22 2015 - 16:25, said: If I just lodged a dispute for bravo playoffs semifinal , will the dispute be looked at before the next round?  

dance210:   Yep. I already saw it, so it will be taken care of before the next round is scheduled :)


dance210
Skirmish 11
arrow
23.03.2015 01:31:10
 
Subject: Skirmish 11
Link on message: #8729695

View PostBastabeard, on Mar 22 2015 - 16:25, said: If I just lodged a dispute for bravo playoffs semifinal , will the dispute be looked at before the next round?  

dance210:   Yep. I already saw it, so it will be taken care of before the next round is scheduled :)


dance210
Skirmish 11
arrow
23.03.2015 01:31:10
 
Subject: Skirmish 11
Link on message: #8729695

View PostBastabeard, on Mar 22 2015 - 16:25, said: If I just lodged a dispute for bravo playoffs semifinal , will the dispute be looked at before the next round?  

dance210:   Yep. I already saw it, so it will be taken care of before the next round is scheduled :)


The_Chieftain
T110E5, Please Tell Me Its Better Then the M103
arrow
22.03.2015 19:44:53
 
Subject: T110E5, Please Tell Me Its Better Then the M103
Link on message: #8728418

The_Chieftain: I'm sorry the M103 isn't working with your play style, but I sure as hell works for mine. I would caution against those who have not yet gotten to M103 reading this thread and abandoning what I think is one of the best tanks in the game. The tank may work for you.   I have placed my opinions on how to use it here  http://worldoftanks....vorite-tanks-3/   And the last piece of advice cut out by the editors.   http://forum.worldof...86#entry8588186


dance210
Skirmish 13 - Looking for a Team/Players
arrow
22.03.2015 19:03:48
 
Subject: Skirmish 13 - Looking for a Team/Players
Link on message: #8728262

dance210: Tournament Page Registration for entire tournament Registration for bravo playoff (weekend) only Forum discussion
If you are a player looking for a team, or a team looking for player(s), feel free to post here.   It is encouraged to say what tank(s) you have or are looking for, to make it easier to find players and teams.   There are two separate registrations. State if you are interested in registering for the entire tournament (Group Stage + playoff) or only for the weekend (Bravo Playoff only).


dance210
Skirmish 13 - Looking for a Team/Players
arrow
22.03.2015 19:03:48
 
Subject: Skirmish 13 - Looking for a Team/Players
Link on message: #8728262

dance210: Tournament Page Registration for entire tournament Registration for bravo playoff (weekend) only Forum discussion
If you are a player looking for a team, or a team looking for player(s), feel free to post here.   It is encouraged to say what tank(s) you have or are looking for, to make it easier to find players and teams.   There are two separate registrations. State if you are interested in registering for the entire tournament (Group Stage + playoff) or only for the weekend (Bravo Playoff only).


dance210
Skirmish 13
arrow
22.03.2015 19:01:22
 
Subject: Skirmish 13
Link on message: #8728255

dance210: Skirmish Rules Tournament Page Registration for entire tournament Registration for bravo playoff (weekend) only Looking for a Team/Players   Group Stage Standings   Basic Tournament Information for Skirmish 13 Please see tournament page for all information   Team Size: 8 combatants + 4 reserves Map: Fisherman's Bay Mode:  Standard Tier Point Minimum: 35 Tier Point Maximum: 77 Tier Limits: This represents the max tier allowed. Teams are allowed to bring lower tiers. ​ Light: Tier 8 Medium: Tier 10 Heavy10 TD: Tier 9 SPG: Tier 9 Special restriction: No duplicate tanks allowed


dance210
Skirmish 13
arrow
22.03.2015 19:01:22
 
Subject: Skirmish 13
Link on message: #8728255

dance210: Skirmish Rules Tournament Page Registration for entire tournament Registration for bravo playoff (weekend) only Looking for a Team/Players   Group Stage Standings   Basic Tournament Information for Skirmish 13 Please see tournament page for all information   Team Size: 8 combatants + 4 reserves Map: Fisherman's Bay Mode:  Standard Tier Point Minimum: 35 Tier Point Maximum: 77 Tier Limits: This represents the max tier allowed. Teams are allowed to bring lower tiers. ​ Light: Tier 8 Medium: Tier 10 Heavy10 TD: Tier 9 SPG: Tier 9 Special restriction: No duplicate tanks allowed


The_Chieftain
Difference between Rifled and Smoothbore?
arrow
22.03.2015 09:46:50
 
Subject: Difference between Rifled and Smoothbore?
Link on message: #8727237

The_Chieftain: There is an additional advantage to the rifle that people have not mentioned. Payload.   Compare the HE component of a 120mm or 125mm smoothbore HE round (or smoke component of a smoke round, etc) with that of a rifled round. Rifled 'payload' rounds tend to be noticably larger, since they don't need to devote some of their length to fins. Tuccy over on the EU forum did some searching for me, and the 120mm smoothbore HE filler is about the same as that of the 105mm rifle.


The_Chieftain
Historical Armor threads are no longer informative and fun
arrow
22.03.2015 09:31:30
 
Subject: Historical Armor threads are no longer informative and fun
Link on message: #8727219

View PostKrieger_07b, on Mar 21 2015 - 13:07, said:   Hm, yes, your AR-15 will save you from tanks and planes. You can totally defend your freedom from a Tomahawk missile with your concealed handgun. If you truly believe that tripe you should never own a gun. Your fantasies about "protecting your rights" are just that, fantasies. The majority of Americans do not feel that way and see those that do as nutjobs eagerly awaiting the day they can have an excuse to shoot someone. If you fantasize about murder, then you don't deserve a gun full stop and it is a crime on every level to let someone like you or Bundy own one.

The_Chieftain:    It is worth pointing out that for pretty much the last decade plus, the US military with tanks, A-10s and cruise missiles has been given something of a run for its money by a relatively small group of lads with AK-47s, home-made explosives, and pickup trucks. Perhaps you underestimate the effectiveness of folks with basic armament. 

View Post1Sherman, on Mar 19 2015 - 21:50, said: View PostWalter_Sobchak, on Mar 19 2015 - 13:46, said:   How would you define a "bad community?"     rough neighborhood, lots of violent crimes, stuff like that.

The_Chieftain:   rough neighborhood, lots of violent crimes, stuff like that.    So because I live in a place which is less likely to suffer from a violent crime, I must be placed at a relative disadvantage when that crime does happen to strike? Where's the logic in that? Or is it your contention that there is a totally safe neighbourhood? And what happens when I leave that neighbourhood?  

View PostWalter_Sobchak, on Mar 19 2015 - 13:46, said:   How would you define a "bad community?"  

The_Chieftain:


The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
arrow
22.03.2015 04:18:06
 
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8726277

View PostDekklinOfDeath, on Mar 22 2015 - 00:05, said:   After I got fired last wednesday, I almost killed myself that night. In order to cope, I spent an entire week baked out of my mind (alcohol makes me feel sick and gives me headaches). Not a single day sober. I was afraid that if I stopped smoking, I'd kill myself. I'm 2 days clean right now and feeling like complete [edited]trash.

The_Chieftain:   Ouch. Stick with it, mate.


Trevzor
Weekday Warfare 10
arrow
21.03.2015 22:59:04
 
Subject: Weekday Warfare 10
Link on message: #8725051

Trevzor: Heyo everybody!   I have gone through the results and created a correct ranking of the teams and have found 5 teams to have been effected by my case of The Dumb (seriously, bad @ Excel.)   These teams are as follows: Rank Teams Total Games Played Total Points Earned  Total Point Possible Win Ratio 1 Red Line Commandos 19 57 57 1.000 7 Straiku Waifus 20 48 60 0.800 9 Szoguni Akademika 19 45 57 0.789 11 VIDAMA 20 47 60 0.783 14 mancos al combate 20 45 60 0.750     Compensation for this problem will be as follows: Red Line Commandos will be awarded gold in accordance to first place (10,000.) All other teams, having Win Ratios being equal to or greater than .200 away from first place, but .050 or less between each other will all receive gold in accordance to second place (7500.) I have decided to compensate the teams in this manner so as not to downplay the achievement that is a perfect record going into days 4 and 5 in the Weekday Warfare.   Furthermore, team that were published incorrectly not in the top 16 will be awarded the either the gold that they were published to have earned or that they would have earned had I not brained super hard on the rankings sheet, whichever amount is higher.   I deeply apologize for the error. I am only but human and sometimes humans screw up.   And now to the Corner of Shame...
  4K1ICTK.jpg


The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
arrow
21.03.2015 21:14:31
 
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8724705

View Postshapeshifter, on Mar 21 2015 - 08:42, said: British testing of guns 26th Jan 1945 "Agenda Tank and Tank destroyer conference, Army war college" AGF (470.8)   Possible T5 gun (48 calibers) in testing? or the T8 105mm.     Ian Hogg in his book Allied artillery of world war two, Has this to say on the T8 105mm gun.   "The 105mm gun T8, this to began as a tank gun, the 105mm T5 of 48 calibers in length. In mid 1944 it was lengthened to 65 calibers to reach the magic 3000 ft/sec velocity figure and proposals for putting it on a wheeled carriage appeared. Development countined through 1945. It fired a 39lb (17.7kg) AP shell at 3100 ft/sec (945 m/sec) and the penetration was claimed as 210 mm @ 1000 yards @ 0 deg"   Interesting info on the T5.   So we have the following   T5 (tank) 48 calibers in length T8 (towed) 65 calibers in length T5E1 (tank) 65 calibers in length T5E2 (tank) 65 calibers in length   A 39lb shell would be the T32 round I imagine as it was the same weight, 3100 f/s is 100 f/s more then what hunnicutt lists.   Chief ever found any info on that short T5 48 caliber 105mm? sounds like it would be an interesting weapon option for T6 tanks.

The_Chieftain:   No, I don't think I did.   I came across the full version of the table above in the TD Board archives on my last trip, and sent it up to Minsk. I'll see if I can find it again.


The_Chieftain
The Chieftain's Random Musings Thread
arrow
21.03.2015 21:06:27
 
Subject: The Chieftain's Random Musings Thread
Link on message: #8724675

The_Chieftain: The Super Pershing re-work is getting a lot of attention recently, I've noticed. I'm afraid I'm partially to blame, I decided to get myself involved, and the whole thing has expanded over not just the T26E4, but also we're looking at the M26 and M46 as well while we're at it (and why not? It's all the same hull, more or less). Part of the problem has been that the official figures we have to hand, such as Hunnicutt and Ordnance descriptions, basically result in a nerf. And, contrary to popular belief, we really don't like to nerf premium vehicles. On the other hand, we're also trying as hard as possible to 'fix' any errors which may exist in a model, let the chips fall as they may. The catch is that although we have information from some Ordnance Branch documents, from which Hunnicutt worked, we have other fairly reputable sources which say otherwise, not least the official figures 'look' wrong. To the point that I was down at an M26 earlier this week with an inclinometer trying to figure out just what the heck is going on and, sure enough, the Hunnicutt figures don't match with the real tank. This isn't so huge a surprise, as the Ordnance Form 50s he mainly worked from are basically quick reference sheets, not engineering specifications or test reports, and it wouldn't be the first time we've discovered that they're wrong. But you can imagine the confusion going on with the models when the modellers are trying to parse incorrect figures with photographs and what they can glean from other sources, with few people agreeing on what's 'right.' In this case, we picked up on the discrepancy a little late, which is why the Super P is getting the public attention. We've still a little work to do, we'll get it right.


dance210
Skirmish 10
arrow
21.03.2015 20:04:02
 
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #8724463

View PostDeadDotEd, on Mar 17 2015 - 19:20, said: The Skirmish 12 page was put up earlier today, and doesn't start for nearly a week. I don't think anyone will get mad, if anything people will be more upset that you're holding off on changes unnecessarily.

dance210: Yes, it was up on Tuesday. I am off on Wednesdays, which means that the earliest it would be changed is Thursday, ~48 hr after it went live. While I know some check the forums and check the tournament page, not everyone will. And someone, somewhere, would get upset about things changing in the middle.   It may seem unnecessary to you to wait. However, experience has taught me that the wider player-base prefers for rules to not change in the middle. I only mentioned when it was going to change so that y'all would have a definite date and know that we were working on adjusting things. If you prefer, I will refrain from giving a heads up in the future.  

View PostThe_Assassin711, on Mar 18 2015 - 21:16, said:   Why did it need to change? What was/is the reason?   Perhaps it would help us to understand better were we to actually know. As it stands now your average skirmish players cannot imagine a single logical argument in favor of it, and as can be seen, this infuriates them.   Please elaborate.

dance210:  

View PostThe_Assassin711, on Mar 20 2015 - 18:52, said: Silence.   Somehow I'm not surprised.

dance210:   Apologies for the delay in responding. The truth is I can't explain it in a way that will make you happy.   There are some things I can say and some things I cannot (and probably some that I shouldn't, but do anyways). I already explained that we changed the format to make the Skirmish more competitive. I could argue the Weekday Warfare was designed to be more competitive, so changing the Skirmish for that reason isn't all that strange.   To be fair, you can probably find about as much complaining about the old format/gold as you can about the new format/gold. We didn't explain why we changed it a year ago and unfortunately we won't be explaining exactly why we changed it this year.   I understand that you won't be happy with that answer but that's the best that I can do. Sorry.


dance210
Skirmish 10
arrow
21.03.2015 20:04:02
 
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #8724463

View PostDeadDotEd, on Mar 17 2015 - 19:20, said: The Skirmish 12 page was put up earlier today, and doesn't start for nearly a week. I don't think anyone will get mad, if anything people will be more upset that you're holding off on changes unnecessarily.

dance210: Yes, it was up on Tuesday. I am off on Wednesdays, which means that the earliest it would be changed is Thursday, ~48 hr after it went live. While I know some check the forums and check the tournament page, not everyone will. And someone, somewhere, would get upset about things changing in the middle.   It may seem unnecessary to you to wait. However, experience has taught me that the wider player-base prefers for rules to not change in the middle. I only mentioned when it was going to change so that y'all would have a definite date and know that we were working on adjusting things. If you prefer, I will refrain from giving a heads up in the future.  

View PostThe_Assassin711, on Mar 18 2015 - 21:16, said:   Why did it need to change? What was/is the reason?   Perhaps it would help us to understand better were we to actually know. As it stands now your average skirmish players cannot imagine a single logical argument in favor of it, and as can be seen, this infuriates them.   Please elaborate.

dance210:  

View PostThe_Assassin711, on Mar 20 2015 - 18:52, said: Silence.   Somehow I'm not surprised.

dance210:   Apologies for the delay in responding. The truth is I can't explain it in a way that will make you happy.   There are some things I can say and some things I cannot (and probably some that I shouldn't, but do anyways). I already explained that we changed the format to make the Skirmish more competitive. I could argue the Weekday Warfare was designed to be more competitive, so changing the Skirmish for that reason isn't all that strange.   To be fair, you can probably find about as much complaining about the old format/gold as you can about the new format/gold. We didn't explain why we changed it a year ago and unfortunately we won't be explaining exactly why we changed it this year.   I understand that you won't be happy with that answer but that's the best that I can do. Sorry.


dance210
Skirmish 10
arrow
21.03.2015 20:04:02
 
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #8724463

View PostDeadDotEd, on Mar 17 2015 - 19:20, said: The Skirmish 12 page was put up earlier today, and doesn't start for nearly a week. I don't think anyone will get mad, if anything people will be more upset that you're holding off on changes unnecessarily.

dance210: Yes, it was up on Tuesday. I am off on Wednesdays, which means that the earliest it would be changed is Thursday, ~48 hr after it went live. While I know some check the forums and check the tournament page, not everyone will. And someone, somewhere, would get upset about things changing in the middle.   It may seem unnecessary to you to wait. However, experience has taught me that the wider player-base prefers for rules to not change in the middle. I only mentioned when it was going to change so that y'all would have a definite date and know that we were working on adjusting things. If you prefer, I will refrain from giving a heads up in the future.  

View PostThe_Assassin711, on Mar 18 2015 - 21:16, said:   Why did it need to change? What was/is the reason?   Perhaps it would help us to understand better were we to actually know. As it stands now your average skirmish players cannot imagine a single logical argument in favor of it, and as can be seen, this infuriates them.   Please elaborate.

dance210:  

View PostThe_Assassin711, on Mar 20 2015 - 18:52, said: Silence.   Somehow I'm not surprised.

dance210:   Apologies for the delay in responding. The truth is I can't explain it in a way that will make you happy.   There are some things I can say and some things I cannot (and probably some that I shouldn't, but do anyways). I already explained that we changed the format to make the Skirmish more competitive. I could argue the Weekday Warfare was designed to be more competitive, so changing the Skirmish for that reason isn't all that strange.   To be fair, you can probably find about as much complaining about the old format/gold as you can about the new format/gold. We didn't explain why we changed it a year ago and unfortunately we won't be explaining exactly why we changed it this year.   I understand that you won't be happy with that answer but that's the best that I can do. Sorry.


dance210
Thanks you dance210 for all the work.
arrow
21.03.2015 19:45:05
 
Subject: Thanks you dance210 for all the work.
Link on message: #8724409

View Postbadmonkey59, on Mar 21 2015 - 07:42, said: dance210, I'm sure sometimes it seems like all we do is [edited]but speaking for myself and I'm sure many others; 'Thank You' for all the time and work you put into the different tournaments. 

dance210:   Thank you badmonkey!!     I love doing tournaments for y'all...you guys are the best! <3


dance210
Thanks you dance210 for all the work.
arrow
21.03.2015 19:45:05
 
Subject: Thanks you dance210 for all the work.
Link on message: #8724409

View Postbadmonkey59, on Mar 21 2015 - 07:42, said: dance210, I'm sure sometimes it seems like all we do is [edited]but speaking for myself and I'm sure many others; 'Thank You' for all the time and work you put into the different tournaments. 

dance210:   Thank you badmonkey!!     I love doing tournaments for y'all...you guys are the best! <3


dance210
Thanks you dance210 for all the work.
arrow
21.03.2015 19:45:05
 
Subject: Thanks you dance210 for all the work.
Link on message: #8724409

View Postbadmonkey59, on Mar 21 2015 - 07:42, said: dance210, I'm sure sometimes it seems like all we do is [edited]but speaking for myself and I'm sure many others; 'Thank You' for all the time and work you put into the different tournaments. 

dance210:   Thank you badmonkey!!     I love doing tournaments for y'all...you guys are the best! <3


The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
arrow
21.03.2015 07:32:35
 
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8722936

View PostDaigensui, on Mar 21 2015 - 05:11, said:   National as in covering the state of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, not national as in the group of people known as nation.

The_Chieftain:   The UK is a little odd. It is a sovereign state made up of a number of individual countries of varying levels of independence. It's both more close, and looser than a federal system at the same time.


The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
arrow
21.03.2015 07:08:58
 
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8722858

View PostDaigensui, on Mar 21 2015 - 03:56, said:   Welsh isn't the official national language, it's just "an" official language of Wales. 

The_Chieftain:   Are you suggesting that Wales is not a nation?


The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
arrow
21.03.2015 05:50:31
 
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8722628

View PostDaigensui, on Mar 21 2015 - 03:29, said:   Neither Spain nor UK have more than one national official language.

The_Chieftain:   True, but the only official national language in the UK is Welsh, so it's not quite the best way of looking at things.


Pigeon_of_War
9.7 Common Test Issues and Reports
arrow
21.03.2015 01:58:58
 
Subject: 9.7 Common Test Issues and Reports
Link on message: #8721775

Pigeon_of_War: Alright, we got word from HQ the hanging garage issue should be fixed by the full release of 9.7, but we cannot guarantee that it will be fixed in this or other iterations of the common test. Apologies in advance. 


The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
arrow
21.03.2015 01:45:03
 
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8721705

View PostEmpressNero, on Mar 20 2015 - 02:15, said:   "Consideration" as in "Gunlion wandered in and said "okay, so what would be some suggestions for things that you want to see changed in-game?"  That's basically it.  No "I'll forward this to the devs", no "That'll never happen", no "Your opinion is very important to us, please wait while we ignore it", nothing.  So basically it's just damage control.  There's not going to do anything about it.  

The_Chieftain:   He doesn't post it, but he does a written assessment of sentiment that he comes across every day or two, and sends it up.


Content_WG
Prueba pública 9.7
arrow
21.03.2015 01:28:18
 
Subject: Prueba pública 9.7
Link on message: #8721630

Content_WG: Prueba por un tiempo limitado las nuevas funciones planificadas para la nueva actualización de World of Tanks.
Texto completo de las noticias


dance210
Weekday Warfare 10
arrow
21.03.2015 00:22:27
 
Subject: Weekday Warfare 10
Link on message: #8721399

View PostValan, on Mar 20 2015 - 15:12, said:   Thus Wargaming NA is promoting 'tainted results' overall, for Weekend Warfare 10.   Everyone in the Top 16 should be compensated the same, in terms of gold regardless.  To do otherwise is utterly unfair.  Why? They get paid for not even having to show up and play a single match on Thursday & Friday.  Meanwhile the Top 16 who 'earned' the right to be there, and were schedule to played against others who did not even 'earn' the right to be in the Top 16 are being penalized for Wargaming errors.   This whole tournament schedule & compensating system stinks to high heavens. Biased, rigged and indefensible.

dance210: The teams that were left off the top 16  are being compensated for a screw up that was not their own. We have a history of compensating teams when there is an issue on our side - either a server failure or a failure of the staff to do something correctly. How, exactly, is that biased or indefensible?   How is anyone playing on Thursday and Friday penalized? The teams are required to show up, play and win if they want gold. Taking out the games against "extra" teams isn't fair. I haven't looked, but there is a possibility that they weren't evenly distributed between the two groups. So, would it be "fair" that one group may remove 3 teams and one group only removes one?   I'm sorry if you don't like it. However, this is how issues have been dealt with in the past. Unless you can give me a good reason to change our policy, the decision stands.   The only way to remove "tainted" results would be to cancel the entire tournament. GG, well done, everyone gets either zero or 200 gold (traditional compensation for server issues). Frankly, that's not something I am prepared or willing to do, but if that is what y'all want...


dance210
Weekday Warfare 10
arrow
21.03.2015 00:22:27
 
Subject: Weekday Warfare 10
Link on message: #8721399

View PostValan, on Mar 20 2015 - 15:12, said:   Thus Wargaming NA is promoting 'tainted results' overall, for Weekend Warfare 10.   Everyone in the Top 16 should be compensated the same, in terms of gold regardless.  To do otherwise is utterly unfair.  Why? They get paid for not even having to show up and play a single match on Thursday & Friday.  Meanwhile the Top 16 who 'earned' the right to be there, and were schedule to played against others who did not even 'earn' the right to be in the Top 16 are being penalized for Wargaming errors.   This whole tournament schedule & compensating system stinks to high heavens. Biased, rigged and indefensible.

dance210: The teams that were left off the top 16  are being compensated for a screw up that was not their own. We have a history of compensating teams when there is an issue on our side - either a server failure or a failure of the staff to do something correctly. How, exactly, is that biased or indefensible?   How is anyone playing on Thursday and Friday penalized? The teams are required to show up, play and win if they want gold. Taking out the games against "extra" teams isn't fair. I haven't looked, but there is a possibility that they weren't evenly distributed between the two groups. So, would it be "fair" that one group may remove 3 teams and one group only removes one?   I'm sorry if you don't like it. However, this is how issues have been dealt with in the past. Unless you can give me a good reason to change our policy, the decision stands.   The only way to remove "tainted" results would be to cancel the entire tournament. GG, well done, everyone gets either zero or 200 gold (traditional compensation for server issues). Frankly, that's not something I am prepared or willing to do, but if that is what y'all want...


dance210
Weekday Warfare 10
arrow
21.03.2015 00:22:27
 
Subject: Weekday Warfare 10
Link on message: #8721399

View PostValan, on Mar 20 2015 - 15:12, said:   Thus Wargaming NA is promoting 'tainted results' overall, for Weekend Warfare 10.   Everyone in the Top 16 should be compensated the same, in terms of gold regardless.  To do otherwise is utterly unfair.  Why? They get paid for not even having to show up and play a single match on Thursday & Friday.  Meanwhile the Top 16 who 'earned' the right to be there, and were schedule to played against others who did not even 'earn' the right to be in the Top 16 are being penalized for Wargaming errors.   This whole tournament schedule & compensating system stinks to high heavens. Biased, rigged and indefensible.

dance210: The teams that were left off the top 16  are being compensated for a screw up that was not their own. We have a history of compensating teams when there is an issue on our side - either a server failure or a failure of the staff to do something correctly. How, exactly, is that biased or indefensible?   How is anyone playing on Thursday and Friday penalized? The teams are required to show up, play and win if they want gold. Taking out the games against "extra" teams isn't fair. I haven't looked, but there is a possibility that they weren't evenly distributed between the two groups. So, would it be "fair" that one group may remove 3 teams and one group only removes one?   I'm sorry if you don't like it. However, this is how issues have been dealt with in the past. Unless you can give me a good reason to change our policy, the decision stands.   The only way to remove "tainted" results would be to cancel the entire tournament. GG, well done, everyone gets either zero or 200 gold (traditional compensation for server issues). Frankly, that's not something I am prepared or willing to do, but if that is what y'all want...


dance210
Skirmish 11
arrow
21.03.2015 00:11:19
 
Subject: Skirmish 11
Link on message: #8721354

View PostBearFan, on Mar 20 2015 - 13:45, said: Does someone have the link for Weekend-Only pairings?

dance210: The weekend only teams are in the playoff brackets, which is located on the Skirmish 11 tournament page.  

View Postanimalflh, on Mar 20 2015 - 14:59, said: Teams may only include existing clan names/tags in their team name if at least one member is directly affiliated with that clan. what excactly does this mean? Can 2 different clans be in 1 team.[2 different clan tags]

dance210: This means that a team cannot be called PBKAC if none of the team members are from the PBKAC clan.   Yes, a team can have members from multiple clans. And, there is no need for a team to be named after the clan name or clan tag; the captain to choose any name, as long as it's appropriate.


dance210
Skirmish 11
arrow
21.03.2015 00:11:19
 
Subject: Skirmish 11
Link on message: #8721354

View PostBearFan, on Mar 20 2015 - 13:45, said: Does someone have the link for Weekend-Only pairings?

dance210: The weekend only teams are in the playoff brackets, which is located on the Skirmish 11 tournament page.  

View Postanimalflh, on Mar 20 2015 - 14:59, said: Teams may only include existing clan names/tags in their team name if at least one member is directly affiliated with that clan. what excactly does this mean? Can 2 different clans be in 1 team.[2 different clan tags]

dance210: This means that a team cannot be called PBKAC if none of the team members are from the PBKAC clan.   Yes, a team can have members from multiple clans. And, there is no need for a team to be named after the clan name or clan tag; the captain to choose any name, as long as it's appropriate.


dance210
Skirmish 11
arrow
21.03.2015 00:11:19
 
Subject: Skirmish 11
Link on message: #8721354

View PostBearFan, on Mar 20 2015 - 13:45, said: Does someone have the link for Weekend-Only pairings?

dance210: The weekend only teams are in the playoff brackets, which is located on the Skirmish 11 tournament page.  

View Postanimalflh, on Mar 20 2015 - 14:59, said: Teams may only include existing clan names/tags in their team name if at least one member is directly affiliated with that clan. what excactly does this mean? Can 2 different clans be in 1 team.[2 different clan tags]

dance210: This means that a team cannot be called PBKAC if none of the team members are from the PBKAC clan.   Yes, a team can have members from multiple clans. And, there is no need for a team to be named after the clan name or clan tag; the captain to choose any name, as long as it's appropriate.


Lert
T35-A driving
arrow
21.03.2015 00:02:46
 
Subject: T35-A driving
Link on message: #8721316

Lert: No you sound good*.   *May contain sarcasm


Lert
T35-A driving
arrow
20.03.2015 23:59:14
 
Subject: T35-A driving
Link on message: #8721297

Lert: The only runner in the world. That makes this one as rare as Tiger 131 in Bovington, though that Tiger is a lot more famous.     Mmmm, dat engine sound.


dance210
Skirmish 12
arrow
20.03.2015 23:39:04
 
Subject: Skirmish 12
Link on message: #8721211

View PostDaikonic, on Mar 20 2015 - 14:19, said: I have a question, if we do this Skirmish XII and Weekday Warfare, will the matches on these overlapping days be in conflict?

dance210:   Nope. The Weekday Warfare will be finished several hours before the Skirmish begins :)


dance210
Skirmish 12
arrow
20.03.2015 23:39:04
 
Subject: Skirmish 12
Link on message: #8721211

View PostDaikonic, on Mar 20 2015 - 14:19, said: I have a question, if we do this Skirmish XII and Weekday Warfare, will the matches on these overlapping days be in conflict?

dance210:   Nope. The Weekday Warfare will be finished several hours before the Skirmish begins :)


dance210
Skirmish 12
arrow
20.03.2015 23:39:04
 
Subject: Skirmish 12
Link on message: #8721211

View PostDaikonic, on Mar 20 2015 - 14:19, said: I have a question, if we do this Skirmish XII and Weekday Warfare, will the matches on these overlapping days be in conflict?

dance210:   Nope. The Weekday Warfare will be finished several hours before the Skirmish begins :)


pizzastorm
PAX East Stream Survey
arrow
20.03.2015 23:24:44
 
Subject: PAX East Stream Survey
Link on message: #8721147

pizzastorm: Hey everyone!   If you have not filled out this survey yet, please take a few minutes and let us know what we can improve on for our next show.   Thanks everyone. 


GeneralDirection
O Canada
arrow
20.03.2015 23:01:33
 
Subject: O Canada
Link on message: #8721014

View PostBuubyTrap, on Mar 20 2015 - 12:21, said: Hi GeneralDirection, long time no see...

GeneralDirection:   Oh hi!


GeneralDirection
O Canada
arrow
20.03.2015 23:01:33
 
Subject: O Canada
Link on message: #8721014

View PostBuubyTrap, on Mar 20 2015 - 12:21, said: Hi GeneralDirection, long time no see...

GeneralDirection:   Oh hi!


Реклама | Adv