Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
MA77
[Corrida Armamentista] Regras & Regulamentos - Correção no Texto
06.06.2018 22:06:50
Subject: [Corrida Armamentista] Regras & Regulamentos - Correção no Texto
Link on message: #11679980
Link on message: #11679980
MA77: Atenção todos os participantes da Corrida Armamentista!
Percebemos que algumas das palavras em uma linha nas regras causaram alguma confusão e, por isso, pedimos desculpas. A linha que estamos falando é a seguinte: Um jogador recebe um multiplicador de clã somente do clã ao qual este jogador pertence no momento do término do evento de corrida armamentista, e caso as seguintes condições tenham sido atendidas:Lutou pelo menos 5 batalhas no evento Corrida Armamentista como parte deste clã depois que o jogador mais recente se juntou ao clã.
Esta regra destina-se a impedir que os jogadores se juntem a um clã no último minuto e recebam grandes quantias de Títulos, embora não tenham participado. Queremos ter certeza de que somos transparentes com esses tipos de problemas e atualizamos o artigo do portal de acordo. Artigo: https://worldoftanks...ce-regulations/ Um jogador recebe um multiplicador de clã somente do clã ao qual este jogador pertence no momento do término do evento de Corrida Armamentista, e caso as seguintes condições tenham sido atendidas:Lutou pelo menos 5 batalhas no evento Corrida Armamentista como parte deste clã. Recebeu pelo menos 100 Pontos de Fama pessoais como parte deste clã.
Pedimos desculpas por qualquer inconveniente que isso possa ter causado a você e, se houver outras alterações ou se precisar de mais esclarecimentos, não hesite em perguntar. Boa sorte no campo de batalha!
Percebemos que algumas das palavras em uma linha nas regras causaram alguma confusão e, por isso, pedimos desculpas. A linha que estamos falando é a seguinte: Um jogador recebe um multiplicador de clã somente do clã ao qual este jogador pertence no momento do término do evento de corrida armamentista, e caso as seguintes condições tenham sido atendidas:Lutou pelo menos 5 batalhas no evento Corrida Armamentista como parte deste clã depois que o jogador mais recente se juntou ao clã.
Esta regra destina-se a impedir que os jogadores se juntem a um clã no último minuto e recebam grandes quantias de Títulos, embora não tenham participado. Queremos ter certeza de que somos transparentes com esses tipos de problemas e atualizamos o artigo do portal de acordo. Artigo: https://worldoftanks...ce-regulations/ Um jogador recebe um multiplicador de clã somente do clã ao qual este jogador pertence no momento do término do evento de Corrida Armamentista, e caso as seguintes condições tenham sido atendidas:Lutou pelo menos 5 batalhas no evento Corrida Armamentista como parte deste clã. Recebeu pelo menos 100 Pontos de Fama pessoais como parte deste clã.
Pedimos desculpas por qualquer inconveniente que isso possa ter causado a você e, se houver outras alterações ou se precisar de mais esclarecimentos, não hesite em perguntar. Boa sorte no campo de batalha!
DomoSapien
June Overview is finally here!
06.06.2018 20:54:05
Subject: June Overview is finally here!
Link on message: #11679920
RoIito, on Jun 06 2018 - 11:13, said: Any info on a new trade-in event? I was looking into that since
some months ago. Crew retraining? It's been 5 or 6
months...since January I think. Return of Tank Rewards?
Anytime soon...this year?
Krovven, on Jun 06 2018 - 11:52, said:
Link on message: #11679920
RoIito, on Jun 06 2018 - 11:13, said: Any info on a new trade-in event? I was looking into that since
some months ago. Crew retraining? It's been 5 or 6
months...since January I think. Return of Tank Rewards?
Anytime soon...this year? DomoSapien: Sorry folks, wish I had more info for ya, but I've honestly
got no idea at this time 
Krovven, on Jun 06 2018 - 11:52, said: DomoSapien:
DomoSapien
June Overview is finally here!
06.06.2018 19:30:47
Subject: June Overview is finally here!
Link on message: #11679821
CapPhrases, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:18, said: you gotta paint the 263 black of course! 
General_Jake, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:20, said: Just curious, why is the FV 4005 on track mission so long? Is
this just to try and get back on a schedule in July to start off
the month?
the_dude_76, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:23, said: Is it just me or do these monthly "overviews" contain less and less
information??
Link on message: #11679821
CapPhrases, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:18, said: you gotta paint the 263 black of course! DomoSapien:
This guy!
Big thanks to everyone for their sharp eyes; the typo is being corrected as we speak. It is actually the Obj 268, and not the Obj 263(B).
This guy!
Big thanks to everyone for their sharp eyes; the typo is being corrected as we speak. It is actually the Obj 268, and not the Obj 263(B).
General_Jake, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:20, said: Just curious, why is the FV 4005 on track mission so long? Is
this just to try and get back on a schedule in July to start off
the month?DomoSapien: I believe it is indeed for scheduling purposes, although I'm not
sure why it's so much longer than the IS-7. Probably, like you
said, to round things off for the start of July.
the_dude_76, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:23, said: Is it just me or do these monthly "overviews" contain less and less
information?? DomoSapien:
Feedback is noted! This overview is light because the month is light on goings-on in general. Father's day will have some special missions, but nothing that would require you to make any substantial preparations in advance.
Feedback is noted! This overview is light because the month is light on goings-on in general. Father's day will have some special missions, but nothing that would require you to make any substantial preparations in advance.
DomoSapien
June Overview is finally here!
06.06.2018 19:14:19
Subject: June Overview is finally here!
Link on message: #11679791
eragon0309, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:08, said: Quick question. Under the tank mastery missions (wave 4), how are
we supposed to master the Obj 263B?
Link on message: #11679791
eragon0309, on Jun 06 2018 - 10:08, said: Quick question. Under the tank mastery missions (wave 4), how are
we supposed to master the Obj 263B? DomoSapien: Oh, hm. That's strange. Looking into it!
Jambijon
PSA: Clarification on Rules & Regulation wording
06.06.2018 19:13:02
Subject: PSA: Clarification on Rules & Regulation wording
Link on message: #11679787
Link on message: #11679787
Jambijon: Attention all Arms Race participants! We realized some of
the wording on a line in the rules has caused some confusion, and
for that, we apologize. The line we are talking about
is as follows: A player receives a clan multiplier only from
the clan to which this player belongs at the moment of the end of
the Arms Race event, and in case the following conditions have been
met: Fought at least 5 battles in the Arms Race event as a part of
this clan after the most recent player joined the clan. This
rule is intended to prevent players from joining a clan at the last
minute and receive a large bond reward event though they didn't
participate. We want to make sure we are transparent
with these types of issues and we have updated the portal article
accordingly. Article: https://worldoftanks.com/en/content/docs/arms-race-regulations/
A player receives a clan multiplier only from the clan to
which this player belongs at the moment of the end of the Arms Race
event, and in case the following conditions have been met: Fought
at least 5 battles in the Arms Race event as a part of this clan.
Earned at least 100 personal Fame Points as a part of this clan.
Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you
and if any other changes or if you need further clarification don't
hesitate to ask. Now go and shoot some tanks!
BigDaddyLaxative
PSA: Clarification on Rules & Regulation wording
06.06.2018 19:13:02
Subject: PSA: Clarification on Rules & Regulation wording
Link on message: #11679787
Link on message: #11679787
BigDaddyLaxative: Attention all Arms Race participants! We realized some of
the wording on a line in the rules has caused some confusion, and
for that, we apologize. The line we are talking about
is as follows: A player receives a clan multiplier only from
the clan to which this player belongs at the moment of the end of
the Arms Race event, and in case the following conditions have been
met: Fought at least 5 battles in the Arms Race event as a part of
this clan after the most recent player joined the clan. This
rule is intended to prevent players from joining a clan at the last
minute and receive a large bond reward event though they didn't
participate. We want to make sure we are transparent
with these types of issues and we have updated the portal article
accordingly. Article: https://worldoftanks.com/en/content/docs/arms-race-regulations/
A player receives a clan multiplier only from the clan to
which this player belongs at the moment of the end of the Arms Race
event, and in case the following conditions have been met: Fought
at least 5 battles in the Arms Race event as a part of this clan.
Earned at least 100 personal Fame Points as a part of this clan.
Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you
and if any other changes or if you need further clarification don't
hesitate to ask. Now go and shoot some tanks!
Hambijon
PSA: Clarification on Rules & Regulation wording
06.06.2018 19:13:02
Subject: PSA: Clarification on Rules & Regulation wording
Link on message: #11679787
Link on message: #11679787
Hambijon: Attention all Arms Race participants! We realized some of
the wording on a line in the rules has caused some confusion, and
for that, we apologize. The line we are talking about
is as follows: A player receives a clan multiplier only from
the clan to which this player belongs at the moment of the end of
the Arms Race event, and in case the following conditions have been
met: Fought at least 5 battles in the Arms Race event as a part of
this clan after the most recent player joined the clan. This
rule is intended to prevent players from joining a clan at the last
minute and receive a large bond reward event though they didn't
participate. We want to make sure we are transparent
with these types of issues and we have updated the portal article
accordingly. Article: https://worldoftanks.com/en/content/docs/arms-race-regulations/
A player receives a clan multiplier only from the clan to
which this player belongs at the moment of the end of the Arms Race
event, and in case the following conditions have been met: Fought
at least 5 battles in the Arms Race event as a part of this clan.
Earned at least 100 personal Fame Points as a part of this clan.
Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you
and if any other changes or if you need further clarification don't
hesitate to ask. Now go and shoot some tanks!
DomoSapien
24-Hour D-Day Missions
06.06.2018 19:09:02
Subject: 24-Hour D-Day Missions
Link on message: #11679777
_Tsavo_, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:17, said: BLARGH to the base capture mission. :C The rest are
okay.
tod914, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:27, said: Wasn't last year's missions 15 of each consumables and boosters,
along with hefty discounts on tier 5 &6? Somebody raid
the venda snack machine before the event this year?
scottie_, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:35, said: The EU is getting a longer Operation Overlord mission. What's
up with that? https://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/special-offers/operation-overlord/
Link on message: #11679777
_Tsavo_, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:17, said: BLARGH to the base capture mission. :C The rest are
okay. DomoSapien: Yeah, I personally would prefer that one not to be a requirement
for another mission, but hopeful
tod914, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:27, said: Wasn't last year's missions 15 of each consumables and boosters,
along with hefty discounts on tier 5 &6? Somebody raid
the venda snack machine before the event this year?DomoSapien: 
We were debating on calling someone to
get the cat out of the machine but he looks so cute in there!
We were debating on calling someone to
get the cat out of the machine but he looks so cute in there!scottie_, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:35, said: The EU is getting a longer Operation Overlord mission. What's
up with that? https://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/special-offers/operation-overlord/DomoSapien: Hmm, so the basic, slightly-blunt answer is this: sometimes EU gets
better missions, sometimes NA gets better missions. If the
difference ever seems extremely unfair, our amazing community
members such as yourselves usually let us know how you feel about
it, and we do our best to accommodate.
The most recent example would be the World of Tanks 7 year anniversary missions, which we were able to rectify thanks to all the passionate feedback from our players
The most recent example would be the World of Tanks 7 year anniversary missions, which we were able to rectify thanks to all the passionate feedback from our players
DomoSapien
June Overview is finally here!
06.06.2018 18:54:38
Subject: June Overview is finally here!
Link on message: #11679759
YANKEE137, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:47, said: And by "next month" you mean August?"We're bringing some
overlooked rarities to the Premium Shop, introducing a new look for
the leKpz M 41 90 mm, and more!" - the "new look
for the leKpz M 41 90 is only available through tomorrow and the
first part of the Overview translates into "We will have stuff for
sale"...uh...thanks?
Cygnus610, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:41, said: Thanks, Domo. Many of us having been waiting a looong
time. Make it happen and I'll bring you a shrubbery.
nasfan, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:49, said:
Link on message: #11679759
YANKEE137, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:47, said: And by "next month" you mean August?"We're bringing some
overlooked rarities to the Premium Shop, introducing a new look for
the leKpz M 41 90 mm, and more!" - the "new look
for the leKpz M 41 90 is only available through tomorrow and the
first part of the Overview translates into "We will have stuff for
sale"...uh...thanks?DomoSapien: Sorry for the trouble, folks! We appreciate your patience in
the meantime, and we'll do our absolute best to get the July
Overview approved and published on or before the first of the
month.
In the meantime, enjoy this topical meme I just whipped up:
In the meantime, enjoy this topical meme I just whipped up:
Cygnus610, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:41, said: Thanks, Domo. Many of us having been waiting a looong
time. Make it happen and I'll bring you a shrubbery. DomoSapien: Ni!
nasfan, on Jun 06 2018 - 09:49, said: DomoSapien:
DomoSapien
June Overview is finally here!
06.06.2018 18:39:44
Subject: June Overview is finally here!
Link on message: #11679741
Link on message: #11679741
DomoSapien: 'Fraid not There will be some x2 Crew XP
events but I haven't heard anything about a crew training
discount.
I'll bring up the suggestion for next month!
There will be some x2 Crew XP
events but I haven't heard anything about a crew training
discount. I'll bring up the suggestion for next month!
DomoSapien
June Overview is finally here!
06.06.2018 18:25:46
Subject: June Overview is finally here!
Link on message: #11679725
Link on message: #11679725
DomoSapien: Hey Tankers,
Sorry for the delay. Dreamhack last weekend threw off our schedule a bit but we're rolling full-steam into the month of June!
Check out the June Overview on our news portal: Click Here
Sorry for the delay. Dreamhack last weekend threw off our schedule a bit but we're rolling full-steam into the month of June!
Check out the June Overview on our news portal: Click Here
DomoSapien
For my Uncle, John Bondurant
06.06.2018 18:19:08
DomoSapien
24-Hour D-Day Missions
06.06.2018 18:16:59
Subject: 24-Hour D-Day Missions
Link on message: #11679709
Link on message: #11679709
DomoSapien: Hey Tankers, To commemorate the infamous historic date that
Allied troops stormed the beaches of Normandy and commenced
Operation Overlord, we have some 24-hour Missions for you to
complete on the battlefield!
Earn some Premium Consumables and Personal Reserves for completing these missions in random battles, strongholds, or skirmishes.
For all the details, head over to our News Portal.
Earn some Premium Consumables and Personal Reserves for completing these missions in random battles, strongholds, or skirmishes.
For all the details, head over to our News Portal.
TeriyakiTanker
This garbage MM has become a scam
06.06.2018 17:59:08
Subject: This garbage MM has become a scam
Link on message: #11679671
JakeTheMystic, on Jun 04 2018 - 21:10, said: 33.4k battles and you are still playing the M4? Sounds like you
just want to be top tier so you can kick puppies. I don't
think anybody will miss you if you leave, goodbye.
Link on message: #11679671
JakeTheMystic, on Jun 04 2018 - 21:10, said: 33.4k battles and you are still playing the M4? Sounds like you
just want to be top tier so you can kick puppies. I don't
think anybody will miss you if you leave, goodbye.TeriyakiTanker: So wanting to play iconic WWII tanks in a WWII tank game is
not a good thing? That really doesn't make much sense!
CabbageMechanic
Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
06.06.2018 07:16:55
Subject: Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
Link on message: #11679314
RitaGamer, on Jun 05 2018 - 13:59, said: To all respect Cabbage, you are misleading the
community here. Ph3lan is one of the best guys that has ever
graced Wargaming.net. As an EU Community Contributor, I had
years of contact (including in person) with him and he is one of
the nicest, most polite and eloquent figures I have ever met. He
wouldn't be in the current position he is otherwise.
Furthermore, It would be nice if you and other -NA- WG staff would
stop throwing a fellow employee under the bus when he was told by
an overstepping and unqualified(*) superior to issue the
message to Foch and especially since after your office added
kindle to the fire to a situation that was already dying down by
issuing a further unnecessary statement without actually bothering
to contact the EU for details on this matter. Have a good
day. Rita Sobral (*) (Unqualified as: He/She
clearly doesn't have a clue on how to behave with the community)
Link on message: #11679314
RitaGamer, on Jun 05 2018 - 13:59, said: To all respect Cabbage, you are misleading the
community here. Ph3lan is one of the best guys that has ever
graced Wargaming.net. As an EU Community Contributor, I had
years of contact (including in person) with him and he is one of
the nicest, most polite and eloquent figures I have ever met. He
wouldn't be in the current position he is otherwise.
Furthermore, It would be nice if you and other -NA- WG staff would
stop throwing a fellow employee under the bus when he was told by
an overstepping and unqualified(*) superior to issue the
message to Foch and especially since after your office added
kindle to the fire to a situation that was already dying down by
issuing a further unnecessary statement without actually bothering
to contact the EU for details on this matter. Have a good
day. Rita Sobral (*) (Unqualified as: He/She
clearly doesn't have a clue on how to behave with the community)
CabbageMechanic:
Hey Rita,
Thanks for chiming in! I agree, Ph3lan is a great guy who entirely deserves to be where he is. My statement is an honest version of events and not intended to "throw anyone under the bus", hence it not naming anyone or assigning any blame.
Regarding the "kindling", I assume you are referring to the statement issued in this Kotaku article. As it happens, I agree entirely. That statement was both unnecessary and unfounded, and if not yet given I am happy to extend SirFoch an apology for it. Those responsible are no longer with the company.
Thanks for stopping by!
Cabbage Mechanic
Hey Rita,
Thanks for chiming in! I agree, Ph3lan is a great guy who entirely deserves to be where he is. My statement is an honest version of events and not intended to "throw anyone under the bus", hence it not naming anyone or assigning any blame.
Regarding the "kindling", I assume you are referring to the statement issued in this Kotaku article. As it happens, I agree entirely. That statement was both unnecessary and unfounded, and if not yet given I am happy to extend SirFoch an apology for it. Those responsible are no longer with the company.
Thanks for stopping by!
Cabbage Mechanic
Volier_Zcit
NICO clan hacked, everyone kicked.
06.06.2018 02:52:39
Subject: NICO clan hacked, everyone kicked.
Link on message: #11679042
Link on message: #11679042
Volier_Zcit: Locking this thread. Please contact our Support Team for
assistance.
Volier_Zcit
Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
06.06.2018 02:03:46
Subject: Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
Link on message: #11678966
Link on message: #11678966
Volier_Zcit: Since the thread has been addressed already by CM. We're going to
lock this thread since some of the posts are getting out of hand
already. We appreciate all the feedback and suggestions.
Gnomon
Aquino Tank Weekend Contest
06.06.2018 00:37:35
Subject: Aquino Tank Weekend Contest
Link on message: #11678847
Link on message: #11678847
Gnomon: Thanks for entering, everyone! I went ahead and sent
tickets through PMs to the folks who won. So, be sure to
keep an eye out on your forum messages, as you will receive the
tickets through there (also, print them out and bring them with you
to the event). If you do not receive a PM today, unfortunately, you
did not win. Hope that everyone going to Aquino Tank Weekend
has fun! To those going, feel free to share some tank pictures when
you get back Thanks again for
taking the time to join in the contest!
Thanks again for
taking the time to join in the contest! MeatheadMilitia
Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
05.06.2018 21:49:39
Subject: Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
Link on message: #11678541
__WarChild__, on Jun 05 2018 - 18:39, said: It's hard not to like Cabbage... 
Meathead on the other
hand... 
Link on message: #11678541
__WarChild__, on Jun 05 2018 - 18:39, said: It's hard not to like Cabbage... Meathead on the other
hand... MeatheadMilitia: I logged in just to say this:
That's messed up.
*Tanker Vanish*
That's messed up.
*Tanker Vanish*
CabbageMechanic
I'm a little worried about the implications of the new license agreement...
05.06.2018 21:26:56
Subject: I'm a little worried about the implications of the new license agreement...
Link on message: #11678493
Link on message: #11678493
CabbageMechanic: Hello,
I have made a longer post addressing this issue here.
TL;DR:
- This section of the EULA isn't new - It is primarily to give us the properly codified recourse to take action against websites who use copyrighted material in inappropriate ways (to use two real examples, alongside neo-Nazi propaganda and pornography)
- No one is going to be banned or lose their account for expressing critical opinions.
I have made a longer post addressing this issue here.
TL;DR:
- This section of the EULA isn't new - It is primarily to give us the properly codified recourse to take action against websites who use copyrighted material in inappropriate ways (to use two real examples, alongside neo-Nazi propaganda and pornography)
- No one is going to be banned or lose their account for expressing critical opinions.
CabbageMechanic
Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
05.06.2018 21:18:50
Subject: Is WG NA gonna start going after youtubers for criticizing them?
Link on message: #11678471
Link on message: #11678471
CabbageMechanic: It is unfortunate that there is some very poor reporting being
done, because this section of the EULA is not new and will not
change how we treat anyone. Here is a link to the 2015 EULA which contains
the same language.
Regarding the SirFoch incident, that was sparked by an erroneous and regrettable statement made by an employee who had neither the authority nor ability to go through with placing copyright strikes on anyone. It has never been and will never be our policy to make copyright strikes against content creators, and we have directly apologized for one of our staff making the implication.
The section of the EULA currently being discussed is aimed specifically at giving us properly codified recourse against "fan" sites who use WoT logos/other things alongside other content that we might find objectionable. To use examples that have actually happened, neo-Nazi propaganda and pornography. We have not and will continue to not take any such actions against legitimate fansites who happen to criticize Wargaming.
To anyone who thinks we make a habit of exercising censorship against critical viewpoints, I encourage you to spend literally any time at all in this General Discussion forum. We remove and sanction posts that violate forum rules (Mainly inappropriate language, incitement of harassment, and people who wear socks with sandals), but critical opinions are fair game.
As always, we appreciate your feedback and hope to see you on the battlefield.
CM
Regarding the SirFoch incident, that was sparked by an erroneous and regrettable statement made by an employee who had neither the authority nor ability to go through with placing copyright strikes on anyone. It has never been and will never be our policy to make copyright strikes against content creators, and we have directly apologized for one of our staff making the implication.
The section of the EULA currently being discussed is aimed specifically at giving us properly codified recourse against "fan" sites who use WoT logos/other things alongside other content that we might find objectionable. To use examples that have actually happened, neo-Nazi propaganda and pornography. We have not and will continue to not take any such actions against legitimate fansites who happen to criticize Wargaming.
To anyone who thinks we make a habit of exercising censorship against critical viewpoints, I encourage you to spend literally any time at all in this General Discussion forum. We remove and sanction posts that violate forum rules (Mainly inappropriate language, incitement of harassment, and people who wear socks with sandals), but critical opinions are fair game.
As always, we appreciate your feedback and hope to see you on the battlefield.
CM
Felipe6666Original
Que se hace con los tanques FL ahora?
05.06.2018 17:39:10
Subject: Que se hace con los tanques FL ahora?
Link on message: #11678109
Link on message: #11678109
Felipe6666Original: Los tanques entregados para jugar Línea del Frente: Camino hacia la
Gloria serán removidos del juego en breve. Las tripulaciones y
equipamiento serán tranferidas automáticamente al Cuartel y al
Depósito respectivamente. ¡Saludos!
Felipe6666Original
[Línea del Frente] Opiniones
05.06.2018 16:21:37
Subject: [Línea del Frente] Opiniones
Link on message: #11678021
Arg73, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:50, said: Pregunta Felipe termino o sigue mas tiempo Linea del Frente?
HighCharity_AkemiHomura, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:35, said: Yo solo tengo una pregunta:
-Cuando volverá?
Y una correccion...
Cuando estas en modo peloton y sales del mismo "frontline" este cambia automatica a Random battles, me paso 6/9 veces jugando Frontline salia del peloton
y me lanzaba directo a publicas :/ me corte ********************* esa cantidad de veces -_- me queria morir xD ... Es por lo unico que me quejo, solo retoquen la Queue y el cooldown mayor cuando pierdes los 3 tanques nada mas. Excelente modo el que se mando esta mitad de año WG, #VUELVANLOSTORNEOS***************
Link on message: #11678021
Arg73, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:50, said: Pregunta Felipe termino o sigue mas tiempo Linea del Frente?Felipe6666Original:
HighCharity_AkemiHomura, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:35, said: Yo solo tengo una pregunta:-Cuando volverá?
Y una correccion...
Cuando estas en modo peloton y sales del mismo "frontline" este cambia automatica a Random battles, me paso 6/9 veces jugando Frontline salia del peloton
y me lanzaba directo a publicas :/ me corte ********************* esa cantidad de veces -_- me queria morir xD ... Es por lo unico que me quejo, solo retoquen la Queue y el cooldown mayor cuando pierdes los 3 tanques nada mas. Excelente modo el que se mando esta mitad de año WG, #VUELVANLOSTORNEOS***************
Felipe6666Original: Sí, Línea del Frente: Camino hacia la Gloria finalizó. De
momento, no puedo brindar precisiones sobre cuándo regresará el
modo (será un evento diferente) Extraño bug... Voy a reportarlo
(sobre todo porque lo jugué bastante en pelotón y nunca me pasó,
pero siempre puede haber excepciones). ¡Saludos!
Extraño bug... Voy a reportarlo
(sobre todo porque lo jugué bastante en pelotón y nunca me pasó,
pero siempre puede haber excepciones). ¡Saludos!MA77
PING ! Alta do Ping !
05.06.2018 15:48:40
Subject: PING ! Alta do Ping !
Link on message: #11677964
Recruta000SP, on Jun 05 2018 - 08:42, said: Ainda não MA77!
Link on message: #11677964
Recruta000SP, on Jun 05 2018 - 08:42, said: Ainda não MA77!MA77: Entrou em contato com a sua operadora? 
TeriyakiTanker
The 'swap' LIE CONFIRMED - (for the leKpz M 41 90 mm GF swap)
05.06.2018 15:41:57
Subject: The 'swap' LIE CONFIRMED - (for the leKpz M 41 90 mm GF swap)
Link on message: #11677959
SoTrue, on Jun 05 2018 - 00:40, said: I don't typically break out my team of lawyers to go through
every word of every WG's announcements. A quick read through
the announcement clearly reads like your stats will transfer - as
they go OUT OF THEIR WAY to say the only difference between tanks
will be the skins. And then they throw in leKpz M 41 90 mm GF
statistics will stay in your Service Record. Which really
close to 'your stats will stay with your tank'. They could
have easily include 'your original GF stats will stay on record
under your old GF tank, your new non-GF will generate it's own new
stats'. See how much clearer that is????
Link on message: #11677959
SoTrue, on Jun 05 2018 - 00:40, said: I don't typically break out my team of lawyers to go through
every word of every WG's announcements. A quick read through
the announcement clearly reads like your stats will transfer - as
they go OUT OF THEIR WAY to say the only difference between tanks
will be the skins. And then they throw in leKpz M 41 90 mm GF
statistics will stay in your Service Record. Which really
close to 'your stats will stay with your tank'. They could
have easily include 'your original GF stats will stay on record
under your old GF tank, your new non-GF will generate it's own new
stats'. See how much clearer that is????TeriyakiTanker: So basically what this entire thread is about is your
inability to read and then your overreaction to that? Am I
missing something?
TeriyakiTanker
Front line is Still Garbage
05.06.2018 04:17:57
Subject: Front line is Still Garbage
Link on message: #11677441
Tank_Mastah, on Jun 02 2018 - 19:21, said: For me it really stings every time I get killed by an OP premium,
Defender / Obj252u, Skorp G, Lowe, etc.. Since I don't have
the premiums, I just end up quitting after 1 match as it seems
stacked against me.
Link on message: #11677441
Tank_Mastah, on Jun 02 2018 - 19:21, said: For me it really stings every time I get killed by an OP premium,
Defender / Obj252u, Skorp G, Lowe, etc.. Since I don't have
the premiums, I just end up quitting after 1 match as it seems
stacked against me. TeriyakiTanker: Or you could learn how to play and actually enjoy yourself.
DomoSapien
Mastery Emblems: Make up your Freaking Mind WG.
05.06.2018 00:33:16
Subject: Mastery Emblems: Make up your Freaking Mind WG.
Link on message: #11677125
__WarChild__, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:30, said: Thanks Domo for responding. I missed the discussion
about the emblems before. Are you saying that 6 will be
awarded from now on? __WarChild__
RoIito, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:31, said: Ok, that's fine but what about the past events where we just
got 3 emblems instead of 6, can't you give us the another 3?
Link on message: #11677125
__WarChild__, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:30, said: Thanks Domo for responding. I missed the discussion
about the emblems before. Are you saying that 6 will be
awarded from now on? __WarChild__DomoSapien: Erm, to my knowledge, yes. The dev team is being absolutely
bombarded with feedback reports from every region right now, since
frontlines has concluded. Barring unforeseen circumstances or a
potential oversight, hopefully the emblem reward will be fixed this
month.
RoIito, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:31, said: Ok, that's fine but what about the past events where we just
got 3 emblems instead of 6, can't you give us the another 3?DomoSapien: Not sure, to be honest! I can definitely bring up the
question with the rest of the team, though!
DomoSapien
Mastery Emblems: Make up your Freaking Mind WG.
05.06.2018 00:27:34
Subject: Mastery Emblems: Make up your Freaking Mind WG.
Link on message: #11677114
Link on message: #11677114
DomoSapien: We mentioned this issue with last month's Mastery missions. I can't
make any guarantees since I haven't seen the missions yet, but to
my knowledge the 3 emblems were a biproduct of the redesigned
customization system, as each emblem must be mounted individually
versus being able to duplicate the emblem on the other side of your
tank free of charge, and will hopefully be corrected with this
month's Mastery Missions.
DomoSapien
Where's the June Calendar?
05.06.2018 00:24:37
Subject: Where's the June Calendar?
Link on message: #11677107
Link on message: #11677107
DomoSapien: Howdy! Looks like all the craziness with Dreamhack this weekend
threw us for a bit of a loop. We are working on getting the June
overview up ASAP, however in the meantime you can definitely
consult the events calendar that Steeljaw linked to above.
Here it is again for your convenience.
Here it is again for your convenience.
DomoSapien
Frontline Feedback
05.06.2018 00:23:03
Subject: Frontline Feedback
Link on message: #11677104
Link on message: #11677104
DomoSapien: This is an interesting point! I'm curious how the game would play
out if there was no bombing run forcing you to retreat.
Theoretically it might allow for some interesting play in terms of
pushing back a rapidly-advancing flank.
DomoSapien
Frontline special tanks are still in the garage
05.06.2018 00:20:01
Subject: Frontline special tanks are still in the garage
Link on message: #11677095
sherped, on Jun 04 2018 - 14:55, said: So, if frontline mode is gone, why are the FL tanks still in my
garage? Can't sell them either. What's up with that??
_Kradok_, on Jun 04 2018 - 14:57, said: It usually tanks them a while to get them out of the game.
This also allows you to move crews/equipment before they are
removed.
Peak_Bagger, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:15, said: The rusted out Halloween tanks stayed in my garage for a couple of
weeks after that event until there was a patch. Perhaps the same
thing here? I was curious as to what happens to that 100% crew
that we get to keep if we don't have enough barracks space.
Link on message: #11677095
sherped, on Jun 04 2018 - 14:55, said: So, if frontline mode is gone, why are the FL tanks still in my
garage? Can't sell them either. What's up with that??DomoSapien: They will be removed in an upcoming micropatch. Your patience in
the meantime is appreciated
_Kradok_, on Jun 04 2018 - 14:57, said: It usually tanks them a while to get them out of the game.
This also allows you to move crews/equipment before they are
removed.DomoSapien: Correct, however all crews/equipment will automatically be moved to
your barracks and depot when the vehicles are removed. (In case you
want to save the 30 gold for dismounts)
Peak_Bagger, on Jun 04 2018 - 15:15, said: The rusted out Halloween tanks stayed in my garage for a couple of
weeks after that event until there was a patch. Perhaps the same
thing here? I was curious as to what happens to that 100% crew
that we get to keep if we don't have enough barracks space.DomoSapien: Gift crews etc. are automatically assigned to temporary bunks in
your barracks. Say you have 100 barracks slots, and you receive 8
more from the FL tanks. Your barracks will read: 108/100. This
means that if you were to purchase 30 additional bunks, you would
only have 22 free, as the 8 crewmen would take up 8 of your
newly-purchased bunks.
DomoSapien
Bravo Wargaming
05.06.2018 00:10:58
Subject: Bravo Wargaming
Link on message: #11677077
the_Deadly_Bulb, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:11, said: The term "Global Team" is in reference to a previous post by
Cabbage Mechanic where I first read it. Please reference post
#1 http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/578659-changes-to-vehicles-with-preferential-matchmaking-notes-on-trade-in/#topmost
Maybe read each others posts? Here's an example of the
kind of response the community is waiting for: Players,
we have been made aware of your sincere and vocal protest against
our intended changes to PMM Premium tanks. We've heard you. Having
given this issue further consideration and due to the overwhelming
negative response to this proposal we are now announcing the
discontinuation of the proposal to remove/re-balance PMM
Premiums. PMM Premiums will be left as they were sold.
Going forward we will endeavour to make changes to MM
to facilitate a better player experience, rather than changing
items paying customers have purchased. We are
currently considering a reprogramming of MM to include provisions
to make 1/3 of all matches same tier, 1/3 of all matches 2 tiers
and 1/3 of all matches 3 tiers. Our inflexible position on
3/5/7 as the preferred template has been identified, along with our
preoccupation with +2/-2 MM as the true problem with the current
MM. Given the success of Frontline we can see no realistic
alternative to increasing the frequency of single tier and 2 tier
matches for all tiers in any effort to improve the player
experience. Thank You for your patience and continued
patronage. Hope this is clear enough for you. FYI,
when it comes to insults no one meets or
matches WG's treatment of its own customers. Your
organisation takes the cake when it comes to "wiping with the hand
that feeds you". 
__WarChild__, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:23, said: What we have hee-yar...is a failure...to communicate (Cool Hand
Luke) First, let me address this: the_Deadly_Bulb is
one of the best allies Wargaming NA has. He is incredibly
supportive of new players. He is patient, kind (isn't this
from the Bible?), etc. Additionally, he spends a lot of money
on this game, not just for himself, but for other players as
well. He is a wise man and therefore ANYTHING he says should
be taken to heart and given full consideration. I have nothing but
respect and admiration for the_Deadly_Bulb.
Second, Wargaming NA has hired a bunch of new folks
and I am impressed with their NA moxie, i.e. willingness to engage
in conversations with the playerbase. This is especially true
since EVERY word they type will be used against them by the
hundreds/thousands of viewers on the Forums - just check out some
of the recent rant videos citing NA moderator responses. Keep
in mind that Wargaming is many different things and not just
different companies like WoT and WoWS. Wargaming RU is very
different from Wargaming NA. The people we deal with are
Wargaming NA folks who are mostly American and have empathy for our
plight here. People like MeatheadMilitia, Bted72, TragicLoss,
etc. are some of the well known public faces of WG here and I don't
think anyone can say they're not decent, nice, good-hearted
people. I don't know Cabbage or Domo or KRZY, but they appear
to WANT to respond to us to help keep the NA playerbase informed
and somewhat content. But they are hamstrung by a Wargaming
RU company that is secretive, a little sneaky, and in a
COST-SAVINGS mode currently - i.e. eliminating entire Seattle
office, moving CA to TX, etc. The future of Wargaming,
especially here in NA seems a bit sketchy to me at the
moment. There is tremendous frustration and anger over PMM,
MM and the lack of response out of Cypress. NA Staff are well
aware of this but are relatively powerless to deal with anything of
significance. I believe that they WANT to respond to us, but
are given strict guidelines and fed Memos of Understanding from the
home office (the equivalent of Kool-Aid) that they are required to
disseminate. Like their mothers taught them, when they don't
have anything good to say, they keep it to themselves. (And if they
talk out of turn, Wargaming will kill them apparently - just watch
Meathead's WoT Weekly from 2 weeks ago).
The point is, we should be thankful and respectful to the Wargaming NA staff and do our best not to put them into the middle of the fray with Wargaming RU. If they get out of line, then they should be chastised for it like anyone. But most of what has been said so far I do not believe is as negative as many people are taking it. Cut them some slack and hopefully they will continue to try and keep us updated on the things that are ahead. We ALL want Wargaming NA to be successful
Happy Tanking! __WarChild__ PS - Got ninja'd
by the_Deadly_Bulb while typing this... 
_Kradok_, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:50, said: Domo... I appreciate all the comments... but you've still
failed to answer the question... If PMM tanks are the
problem for MM, then why are you still selling them? Can we
get an answer for this? All the 'compiling of data" doesn't
really do squat to answer that for us...
Link on message: #11677077
the_Deadly_Bulb, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:11, said: The term "Global Team" is in reference to a previous post by
Cabbage Mechanic where I first read it. Please reference post
#1 http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/578659-changes-to-vehicles-with-preferential-matchmaking-notes-on-trade-in/#topmost
Maybe read each others posts? Here's an example of the
kind of response the community is waiting for: Players,
we have been made aware of your sincere and vocal protest against
our intended changes to PMM Premium tanks. We've heard you. Having
given this issue further consideration and due to the overwhelming
negative response to this proposal we are now announcing the
discontinuation of the proposal to remove/re-balance PMM
Premiums. PMM Premiums will be left as they were sold.
Going forward we will endeavour to make changes to MM
to facilitate a better player experience, rather than changing
items paying customers have purchased. We are
currently considering a reprogramming of MM to include provisions
to make 1/3 of all matches same tier, 1/3 of all matches 2 tiers
and 1/3 of all matches 3 tiers. Our inflexible position on
3/5/7 as the preferred template has been identified, along with our
preoccupation with +2/-2 MM as the true problem with the current
MM. Given the success of Frontline we can see no realistic
alternative to increasing the frequency of single tier and 2 tier
matches for all tiers in any effort to improve the player
experience. Thank You for your patience and continued
patronage. Hope this is clear enough for you. FYI,
when it comes to insults no one meets or
matches WG's treatment of its own customers. Your
organisation takes the cake when it comes to "wiping with the hand
that feeds you". DomoSapien: Sorry, appears I was drawing an inference that wasn't there as
well. I got a bit confused because the quotation marks typically
implies sarcasm, but the term Global Team was being used literally
in this case.
To clarify, CabbageMechanic is one of my Supervisors. I am a Community Coordinator, not a Manager. Making those types of responses is moreso in his wheelhouse. Making official statements regarding controversial policy is not something I am always able to do, but reporting on sentiment is indeed. I try to do whatever I can, even when I can't do much. I really do apologize if that is, in your opinion, me deflecting or not taking ownership of the issue, but I am not the only member of this team and I can't overstep my boundaries. So in this case I can't give you the type of response you would like to receive, if that's supposed to be an official policy statement.
And I appreciate the clarification as well! I apologize for the misunderstanding but text is not the most efficient way to convey tone. We do indeed have a global team, namely the leadership team at Wargaming HQ in Cyprus, as well as the development team in Minsk!
To clarify, CabbageMechanic is one of my Supervisors. I am a Community Coordinator, not a Manager. Making those types of responses is moreso in his wheelhouse. Making official statements regarding controversial policy is not something I am always able to do, but reporting on sentiment is indeed. I try to do whatever I can, even when I can't do much. I really do apologize if that is, in your opinion, me deflecting or not taking ownership of the issue, but I am not the only member of this team and I can't overstep my boundaries. So in this case I can't give you the type of response you would like to receive, if that's supposed to be an official policy statement.
And I appreciate the clarification as well! I apologize for the misunderstanding but text is not the most efficient way to convey tone. We do indeed have a global team, namely the leadership team at Wargaming HQ in Cyprus, as well as the development team in Minsk!
__WarChild__, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:23, said: What we have hee-yar...is a failure...to communicate (Cool Hand
Luke) First, let me address this: the_Deadly_Bulb is
one of the best allies Wargaming NA has. He is incredibly
supportive of new players. He is patient, kind (isn't this
from the Bible?), etc. Additionally, he spends a lot of money
on this game, not just for himself, but for other players as
well. He is a wise man and therefore ANYTHING he says should
be taken to heart and given full consideration. I have nothing but
respect and admiration for the_Deadly_Bulb.
Second, Wargaming NA has hired a bunch of new folks
and I am impressed with their NA moxie, i.e. willingness to engage
in conversations with the playerbase. This is especially true
since EVERY word they type will be used against them by the
hundreds/thousands of viewers on the Forums - just check out some
of the recent rant videos citing NA moderator responses. Keep
in mind that Wargaming is many different things and not just
different companies like WoT and WoWS. Wargaming RU is very
different from Wargaming NA. The people we deal with are
Wargaming NA folks who are mostly American and have empathy for our
plight here. People like MeatheadMilitia, Bted72, TragicLoss,
etc. are some of the well known public faces of WG here and I don't
think anyone can say they're not decent, nice, good-hearted
people. I don't know Cabbage or Domo or KRZY, but they appear
to WANT to respond to us to help keep the NA playerbase informed
and somewhat content. But they are hamstrung by a Wargaming
RU company that is secretive, a little sneaky, and in a
COST-SAVINGS mode currently - i.e. eliminating entire Seattle
office, moving CA to TX, etc. The future of Wargaming,
especially here in NA seems a bit sketchy to me at the
moment. There is tremendous frustration and anger over PMM,
MM and the lack of response out of Cypress. NA Staff are well
aware of this but are relatively powerless to deal with anything of
significance. I believe that they WANT to respond to us, but
are given strict guidelines and fed Memos of Understanding from the
home office (the equivalent of Kool-Aid) that they are required to
disseminate. Like their mothers taught them, when they don't
have anything good to say, they keep it to themselves. (And if they
talk out of turn, Wargaming will kill them apparently - just watch
Meathead's WoT Weekly from 2 weeks ago). The point is, we should be thankful and respectful to the Wargaming NA staff and do our best not to put them into the middle of the fray with Wargaming RU. If they get out of line, then they should be chastised for it like anyone. But most of what has been said so far I do not believe is as negative as many people are taking it. Cut them some slack and hopefully they will continue to try and keep us updated on the things that are ahead. We ALL want Wargaming NA to be successful
Happy Tanking! __WarChild__ PS - Got ninja'd
by the_Deadly_Bulb while typing this... DomoSapien:
Thanks WarChild, I appreciate the kind words! I wouldn't say we are hamstrung by our global organization, as every part of our organization is working to improve our communication and transparency. It's a work in progress, and it's no easy task but I have a lot of confidence in all our teams moving forward. And I have no doubts as to the_Deadly_bulb's positivity in the community, he/she simply took me by surprise because I'm familiar with acronyms, including the meaning of that one in particular, and wasn't sure why it was directed at me personally. Really didn't mean any offense by my initial comment, I was trying to help direct a frustrated player to a cost-effective alternative to the expensive bundles included with the T14 sale, and include a quick thank-you for the folks who support our game and literally provide me with a livelihood.
The offer still stands, if you'd like to platoon up and get to know me better, I always accept any and all friend requests, and I'm happy to answer whatever questions I reasonably can. If being human and actually trying to have a conversation with you is indicative of failure, I'd rather be a failure and have meaningful conversations than selectively read and reply only to comments that are positive. Even if you don't have anything nice to say, and all the feedback is negative, it's still possible to rationally explain your position without resorting to insults. I simply ask that you treat others the way you would like to be treated.
Thanks WarChild, I appreciate the kind words! I wouldn't say we are hamstrung by our global organization, as every part of our organization is working to improve our communication and transparency. It's a work in progress, and it's no easy task but I have a lot of confidence in all our teams moving forward. And I have no doubts as to the_Deadly_bulb's positivity in the community, he/she simply took me by surprise because I'm familiar with acronyms, including the meaning of that one in particular, and wasn't sure why it was directed at me personally. Really didn't mean any offense by my initial comment, I was trying to help direct a frustrated player to a cost-effective alternative to the expensive bundles included with the T14 sale, and include a quick thank-you for the folks who support our game and literally provide me with a livelihood.
The offer still stands, if you'd like to platoon up and get to know me better, I always accept any and all friend requests, and I'm happy to answer whatever questions I reasonably can. If being human and actually trying to have a conversation with you is indicative of failure, I'd rather be a failure and have meaningful conversations than selectively read and reply only to comments that are positive. Even if you don't have anything nice to say, and all the feedback is negative, it's still possible to rationally explain your position without resorting to insults. I simply ask that you treat others the way you would like to be treated.
_Kradok_, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:50, said: Domo... I appreciate all the comments... but you've still
failed to answer the question... If PMM tanks are the
problem for MM, then why are you still selling them? Can we
get an answer for this? All the 'compiling of data" doesn't
really do squat to answer that for us...DomoSapien: This is information that I quite literally do not have at my
disposal. As soon as we find out what exactly is going on with
Preferential Matchmaking, I should hopefully have an answer for
that question. So, my personal take on it is
this: I think the language in the article wasn't the greatest,
because it suggests that pref MM tanks are the only issue with
Matchmaking. That's not true, there are quite a few issues: you
have games of 30 players each, with 5 different classes, classes
that are divisible into subclasses, from 11 different nations, with
mechanics unique to certain nations, and different maps that favor
different classes above others (Prokhorovka vs. Himmelsdorf),
furthermore some classes and subclasses are weighted differently
than others (ie: the way the number of SPG's in a battle is
limited.) In addition, players can leave the battle as soon as
their vehicle is destroyed, meaning MM can't accurately predict how
many vehicles it'll have at its disposal when forming a match. I
can't claim to know precisely how each match is formed, but I know
that there are tons of different variables it needs to account for:
pref MM is just one of them. It adds strain to the matchmaker,
versus being the sole burden and only cause for the lack of
top-tier matches. By that logic the magic formula to being top-tier
would therefore be playing tier IX exclusively, and I've had plenty
of tier X games in my tier IX vehicles.
On the other hand, it never hurts to gather as much feedback as possible. Believe me, I understand that selling pref MM tanks despite the recent controversy is also a controversial move. Gathering more feedback to illustrate the volume & significance of sentiment, as well as urgency of this issue should theoretically expedite the process of getting that information, however. I'm not monitoring the thread, I'm doing my best to answer your questions with the information I have.
Like I said, I don't want to speculate because speculation leads to misinformation. I'd rather be honest with you and tell you that I don't know than start guessing and end up making promises on behalf of an organization that's much bigger than just little old me. Yes, the question has in fact been raised in a feedback report, I have not received any information regarding the question, and I don't think you're being mean at all (maybe a bit heavy on the sarcasm side, but definitely not mean ) On the contrary that's much
more polite than some of the stuff I saw when I was working in CS
On the other hand, it never hurts to gather as much feedback as possible. Believe me, I understand that selling pref MM tanks despite the recent controversy is also a controversial move. Gathering more feedback to illustrate the volume & significance of sentiment, as well as urgency of this issue should theoretically expedite the process of getting that information, however. I'm not monitoring the thread, I'm doing my best to answer your questions with the information I have.
Like I said, I don't want to speculate because speculation leads to misinformation. I'd rather be honest with you and tell you that I don't know than start guessing and end up making promises on behalf of an organization that's much bigger than just little old me. Yes, the question has in fact been raised in a feedback report, I have not received any information regarding the question, and I don't think you're being mean at all (maybe a bit heavy on the sarcasm side, but definitely not mean
) On the contrary that's much
more polite than some of the stuff I saw when I was working in CS
DomoSapien
M41-90mm : Taking the BlackDog for a walk
04.06.2018 22:04:04
Subject: M41-90mm : Taking the BlackDog for a walk
Link on message: #11676794
4TankersAndDog, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:02, said: *removed thumbnails to not clutter thread*
Link on message: #11676794
4TankersAndDog, on Jun 04 2018 - 13:02, said: *removed thumbnails to not clutter thread*DomoSapien:
Thanks! You are a gentleman and a scholar
+1
Thanks! You are a gentleman and a scholar
+1DomoSapien
Frontline... Total waste of time.
04.06.2018 22:02:26
Subject: Frontline... Total waste of time.
Link on message: #11676789
Link on message: #11676789
DomoSapien: This is awesome feedback, thanks for posting!
Regarding the ranking system, are you referring to the leaderboards after hitting 30 on your third prestige? I personally didn't make it past prestige 2 since I also overdid it a bit when the gamemode first came out and found myself going back to grind my T20 and Standard B instead; What would you recommend as a meaningful reward for making it onto the leaderboards? Perhaps some bonds or a unique emblem?
Regarding the ranking system, are you referring to the leaderboards after hitting 30 on your third prestige? I personally didn't make it past prestige 2 since I also overdid it a bit when the gamemode first came out and found myself going back to grind my T20 and Standard B instead; What would you recommend as a meaningful reward for making it onto the leaderboards? Perhaps some bonds or a unique emblem?
DomoSapien
SU-76 I Two TGS today.
04.06.2018 21:58:40
Subject: SU-76 I Two TGS today.
Link on message: #11676778
Link on message: #11676778
DomoSapien: Impressive battles for sure! Digging the 76i Gameplay!
I always feel kinda bad taking the 76i out and getting a top tier battle. Gotta try the HE shells out The AP rounds already hit so hard
I always figure switching to HE would be overkill.
I always feel kinda bad taking the 76i out and getting a top tier battle. Gotta try the HE shells out
The AP rounds already hit so hard
I always figure switching to HE would be overkill. DomoSapien
M41-90mm : Taking the BlackDog for a walk
04.06.2018 21:55:26
Subject: M41-90mm : Taking the BlackDog for a walk
Link on message: #11676771
Link on message: #11676771
DomoSapien: I absolutely LOVE all your scouting guides. Watching them has
seriously helped me improve my LT gameplay exponentially. Do you
have a guide for LT play on Lakeville? I feel like I never
contribute on that map other than some clutch initial spots up the
middle road.
DomoSapien
Bravo Wargaming
04.06.2018 21:50:55
Subject: Bravo Wargaming
Link on message: #11676762
ShookYang, on Jun 04 2018 - 11:56, said: Make upgrading pref mm tanks to non-pref mm with buffs an option
that we can opt out of. If we prefer to keep our pref mm
tanks as is, let us. That means no buffs and still have pref
mm, with the expectation that WG will stop trying to fix
matchmaking for pref mm tanks.
SpectreHD, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:01, said: I think he is just highlighting that he has been a WG
supporter that others on the forums have gone as far and labelled
him a shill. Even then he does not like the decision to alter the
PMM vehicles. He is also not insulting anyone. The
"[edited]" in his post is just him showing how discontent he is.
The profanity was not directed at any individual. No,
WG should still alter the MM. They got themselves into this mess
with their wonderful 3/5/7 template even as tanks are more or less
balanced within their same tier. So they should alter the MM, not
only for preferential MM tanks even after whatever change the
implement and players still keeping their original PMM vehicles,
but for all tanks to not always be bottom tier MOST of
the time.
Lesser_Spotted_Panzer, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:03, said: Since you want to know what we would consider an acceptable
alternative to the PMM changes, here are my demands/suggestions.
Feel free to put them in your feedback report so that the
development team can ignore them. 1) Fix the current
MM system. 4tankers produced a video that suggested changing MM to
5/5/5 (among other changes). If that worked out as suggested, I
would be fine with the removal of PMM status on my PMM tanks (so
long as they get some buffage). The main reason people have their
pitch forks out is because they are sick and tired of their premium
tanks always being bottom tier. So changing our PMM tanks to always
see tier 10 tanks is a major kick in the nads. 2) If you don't fix
the current MM, I want my PMM tanks to remain as PMM tanks, but
they still need to be buffed to be competitive. They are generally
unplayable (or unprofitable) since the MM change a year ago. 3) If
you really insist on removing their PMM status, I either want a) a
full refund (in actual cash - yes I know that is not practical), b)
The option to change to another equivalent tank (which is a problem
for me since I have them all, or c) Give me a free BIA crew for
each one as compensation for losing their PMM status.
commander42, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:11, said: anecdotal but, I know that some people on the forums have
said they have spent thousands. Most people who spend on the
game will not spend that much, there are many many people who
haven't spent any, and a lot of people who have contributed a small
amount, and then the outliers who spend 4(or more..) digits on the
game
Whisky_A_Go_Go, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:13, said: I love when the "Admin" post a bunch of elitist, snobbish,
condescending crap and when he gets called on it he tries to play
the victim and post more elitist, snobbish, condescending crap.
Well done, bud. Look, we all know who you are. We all
know you got this gig as a thankless addition to other crap already
on your plate. We all know you're also part time which is why
you're not here often enough to follow a conversation, let alone be
able to comment intelligently in it. We know a lot more than
you think, so the least you can do is not shell out baseless lip
service. The fact is we've complained about the same things
for 6 years. You are the 39th community admin I've seen here. You
wont be the last. All of you do the same exact thing:
deflect, detract and make hollow promises. To be frank, it
would be in your best interest to stop posting altogether and let
us move on to Admin number 40 just for kicks and grins and an
absolute lack of anything better to do.
Link on message: #11676762
ShookYang, on Jun 04 2018 - 11:56, said: Make upgrading pref mm tanks to non-pref mm with buffs an option
that we can opt out of. If we prefer to keep our pref mm
tanks as is, let us. That means no buffs and still have pref
mm, with the expectation that WG will stop trying to fix
matchmaking for pref mm tanks.DomoSapien:
I think one of the concerns would be that segmenting players into Pref/Non-Pref matchmaking pools would place even more strain on the matchmaker than prior, resulting in long queue times for one of these groups of players, and the potential for drastically imbalanced matches. But perhaps there is a way to account for this! Thank you for the suggestion.
I think one of the concerns would be that segmenting players into Pref/Non-Pref matchmaking pools would place even more strain on the matchmaker than prior, resulting in long queue times for one of these groups of players, and the potential for drastically imbalanced matches. But perhaps there is a way to account for this! Thank you for the suggestion.
SpectreHD, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:01, said: I think he is just highlighting that he has been a WG
supporter that others on the forums have gone as far and labelled
him a shill. Even then he does not like the decision to alter the
PMM vehicles. He is also not insulting anyone. The
"[edited]" in his post is just him showing how discontent he is.
The profanity was not directed at any individual. No,
WG should still alter the MM. They got themselves into this mess
with their wonderful 3/5/7 template even as tanks are more or less
balanced within their same tier. So they should alter the MM, not
only for preferential MM tanks even after whatever change the
implement and players still keeping their original PMM vehicles,
but for all tanks to not always be bottom tier MOST of
the time.DomoSapien:
Personally, I think it's disrespectful to call someone a shill for expressing support regarding something they enjoy. By that same logic I think it's unfair to ignore someone's feedback simply because they are upset and don't express it in the politest way. I understand where he's coming from and I genuinely want to hear what his suggestions would be to best address the situation. I genuinely don't know if Pref MM vehicles are having such a drastic impact on the 3/5/7 MM template or if that was simply poor wording on our part, but I want to make sure I can make my report as comprehensive and clear as possible. That means the largest possible volume of citations for all feedback points. The more people that express a particular position, the more examples of that I can include in the report.
Personally, I think it's disrespectful to call someone a shill for expressing support regarding something they enjoy. By that same logic I think it's unfair to ignore someone's feedback simply because they are upset and don't express it in the politest way. I understand where he's coming from and I genuinely want to hear what his suggestions would be to best address the situation. I genuinely don't know if Pref MM vehicles are having such a drastic impact on the 3/5/7 MM template or if that was simply poor wording on our part, but I want to make sure I can make my report as comprehensive and clear as possible. That means the largest possible volume of citations for all feedback points. The more people that express a particular position, the more examples of that I can include in the report.
Lesser_Spotted_Panzer, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:03, said: Since you want to know what we would consider an acceptable
alternative to the PMM changes, here are my demands/suggestions.
Feel free to put them in your feedback report so that the
development team can ignore them. 1) Fix the current
MM system. 4tankers produced a video that suggested changing MM to
5/5/5 (among other changes). If that worked out as suggested, I
would be fine with the removal of PMM status on my PMM tanks (so
long as they get some buffage). The main reason people have their
pitch forks out is because they are sick and tired of their premium
tanks always being bottom tier. So changing our PMM tanks to always
see tier 10 tanks is a major kick in the nads. 2) If you don't fix
the current MM, I want my PMM tanks to remain as PMM tanks, but
they still need to be buffed to be competitive. They are generally
unplayable (or unprofitable) since the MM change a year ago. 3) If
you really insist on removing their PMM status, I either want a) a
full refund (in actual cash - yes I know that is not practical), b)
The option to change to another equivalent tank (which is a problem
for me since I have them all, or c) Give me a free BIA crew for
each one as compensation for losing their PMM status.DomoSapien: All interesting suggestions! I am genuinely curious to see how a
5/5/5 template would play out, and I'd definitely be interested in
testing something like that out. I think some Pref tanks are in a
better place than others, and it would have to be done carefully
but usually they are only lacking in certain parameters. Slight
buffs to these parameters (for example, the IS-6's penetration
values) might be a great way to do it. I agree that a cash refund
would be pretty impractical, but honestly the free BIA crew as
compensation sounds pretty reasonable to me as a player.
commander42, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:11, said: anecdotal but, I know that some people on the forums have
said they have spent thousands. Most people who spend on the
game will not spend that much, there are many many people who
haven't spent any, and a lot of people who have contributed a small
amount, and then the outliers who spend 4(or more..) digits on the
gameDomoSapien: Certainly, with every free to play game there are some players who
spend a loooot of money. And it's difficult to balance the needs of
the players who have spent quite a bit on the game, make sure they
feel like they're appreciated for the overwhelming financial
support they have given our product, but make sure that all players
are treated fairly, and players who spend less aren't treated as
second-class citizens simply because they can't afford to dish out
a bunch of cash on tanks.
Whisky_A_Go_Go, on Jun 04 2018 - 12:13, said: I love when the "Admin" post a bunch of elitist, snobbish,
condescending crap and when he gets called on it he tries to play
the victim and post more elitist, snobbish, condescending crap.
Well done, bud. Look, we all know who you are. We all
know you got this gig as a thankless addition to other crap already
on your plate. We all know you're also part time which is why
you're not here often enough to follow a conversation, let alone be
able to comment intelligently in it. We know a lot more than
you think, so the least you can do is not shell out baseless lip
service. The fact is we've complained about the same things
for 6 years. You are the 39th community admin I've seen here. You
wont be the last. All of you do the same exact thing:
deflect, detract and make hollow promises. To be frank, it
would be in your best interest to stop posting altogether and let
us move on to Admin number 40 just for kicks and grins and an
absolute lack of anything better to do.DomoSapien: To be frank, I wasn't aware that "without folks like you, I
wouldn't have this cool job so thanks!" was snobbish, elitist, and
condescending. I'm genuinely doing my best to be as honest and
understanding as I can. After all, I've been part of this community
since well before I started working with Wargaming (just 1 year
less than you, actually), and I accepted this job/moved to Texas
because I'm confident that our team will be able to make a positive
difference in the community. I haven't promised anything other than
the promise that I will compile all of your feedback. I'm not a
developer, and I don't have the ability to directly implement your
suggestions, but I do what I can.
I would disagree, based on what you've said so far I'd actually say you don't know me at all. I encourage you to read my meet the staff post and actually get to know me instead of wildly drawing inferences that don't exist. I'd be more than happy to platoon up, run some battles and chat with you on teamspeak so we can get to know eachother better and clear up any misunderstandings between us Feel free to send me an invite
in-game!
To everyone who has provided suggestions and feedback, thank you for taking the time to provide those! I appreciate all your passion, as well as your creative thinking. World of Tanks is something that, for better or for worse, we all know and love. With every relationship, there are ups and downs, and with every relationship, communication is key. I want to do everything I can to improve that communication, and I can personally promise you all that I'm adding all your feedback to my next report immediately after clicking that "post" button. You guys rock <3 Please keep the suggestions coming!
I would disagree, based on what you've said so far I'd actually say you don't know me at all. I encourage you to read my meet the staff post and actually get to know me instead of wildly drawing inferences that don't exist. I'd be more than happy to platoon up, run some battles and chat with you on teamspeak so we can get to know eachother better and clear up any misunderstandings between us
Feel free to send me an invite
in-game! To everyone who has provided suggestions and feedback, thank you for taking the time to provide those! I appreciate all your passion, as well as your creative thinking. World of Tanks is something that, for better or for worse, we all know and love. With every relationship, there are ups and downs, and with every relationship, communication is key. I want to do everything I can to improve that communication, and I can personally promise you all that I'm adding all your feedback to my next report immediately after clicking that "post" button. You guys rock <3 Please keep the suggestions coming!
DomoSapien
Elevated GPU temps in garage UI
04.06.2018 20:54:42
Subject: Elevated GPU temps in garage UI
Link on message: #11676639
Link on message: #11676639
DomoSapien: So, not sure how much this'll help but try changing the
following settings:
Under your general tab, bottom right corner > Garage Camera rotation: Never, Disable Garage Camera animation when moving the mouse cursor.
Under your general tab, bottom right corner > Garage Camera rotation: Never, Disable Garage Camera animation when moving the mouse cursor.
DomoSapien
Bravo Wargaming
04.06.2018 20:47:01
Subject: Bravo Wargaming
Link on message: #11676631
the_Deadly_Bulb, on Jun 04 2018 - 11:28, said: I've spent in excess of $3k on this game. To thank me your
intent is to [edited]my PMM tanks. Not 1 cent more. ESAD.
Take that message to your "Global Team"
Don't forget to tell them this is from a player widely considered a shill for WG
Link on message: #11676631
the_Deadly_Bulb, on Jun 04 2018 - 11:28, said: I've spent in excess of $3k on this game. To thank me your
intent is to [edited]my PMM tanks. Not 1 cent more. ESAD.
Take that message to your "Global Team"Don't forget to tell them this is from a player widely considered a shill for WG
DomoSapien: I don't pay attention to politics, be they forum politics or
otherwise. I care about facts. I don't know who considers you a
shill, nor do I know what you're implying with quotes around
"Global Team" but you can easily provide the same feedback without
having to resort to personal insults and profanity.
I'm just trying to help you, man. I personally don't want to do anything to your PMM tanks, nor do I personally have the power to do anything to your PMM Tanks, one way or another.
So you're welcome to continue with the insults or you could let me know what you would like to see as an acceptable alternative to the most recently proposed plan of action; that way I can make sure that's expressed in my next report. I'm not kidding when I'm saying that I've been making note of each and every comment I've come across regarding sentiment around recent policy decisions. So whaddaya say, can we try and turn this into a constructive dialogue?
I'm just trying to help you, man. I personally don't want to do anything to your PMM tanks, nor do I personally have the power to do anything to your PMM Tanks, one way or another.
So you're welcome to continue with the insults or you could let me know what you would like to see as an acceptable alternative to the most recently proposed plan of action; that way I can make sure that's expressed in my next report. I'm not kidding when I'm saying that I've been making note of each and every comment I've come across regarding sentiment around recent policy decisions. So whaddaya say, can we try and turn this into a constructive dialogue?
DomoSapien
Bravo Wargaming
04.06.2018 20:04:39
Subject: Bravo Wargaming
Link on message: #11676576
Whisky_A_Go_Go, on Jun 03 2018 - 11:10, said: How many alt accounts did you log into to get that +23 rep
for that nonsensical post? I'll start the guessing
at...hmmmmm...23. But it wasn't all you. You had the 3 other people
left working there help you out with it.
the_Deadly_Bulb, on Jun 03 2018 - 11:40, said: Just keep pedaling and telling yourself all that reassuring,
patronising nonsense as your paying playerbase shrinks. Hope
you have other job 'skills'.
_Kradok_, on Jun 04 2018 - 09:58, said: Domo?? The afore-quoted interrogative statement begs a
response.... :crickets:
Wtornado, on Jun 04 2018 - 10:03, said: You should of bought the new PTW KV-2 (R as in racing)WH40K tank
The low tiers will be swamped with this new PTW tank.
Oh PTW=Pay to win.
Link on message: #11676576
Whisky_A_Go_Go, on Jun 03 2018 - 11:10, said: How many alt accounts did you log into to get that +23 rep
for that nonsensical post? I'll start the guessing
at...hmmmmm...23. But it wasn't all you. You had the 3 other people
left working there help you out with it.DomoSapien:
the_Deadly_Bulb, on Jun 03 2018 - 11:40, said: Just keep pedaling and telling yourself all that reassuring,
patronising nonsense as your paying playerbase shrinks. Hope
you have other job 'skills'. DomoSapien: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Just trying to be friendly and helpful. Sorry if
me trying to be optimistic offended you, but what I said was
genuine. I sincerely appreciate the support of all our players, as
I know all too well how difficult it can be to fit premium
purchases into one's budget when trying to, say, make ends meet in
college like I was when I started playing. Buying a T34, for
example, because I couldn't afford to keep buying Premium every
month but needed credits for my Jagdpanther II, was a very big and
difficult decision for me.
I'm sorry you feel that was a patronizing response, because it came from the heart. I understand you're passionate about the game that you know and love, just as I am. If shooting a bit of negativity my way is a productive outlet, I'm happy to receive that negativity. I'm also happy to add your feedback or your suggestions to my feedback reports.
I'm sorry you feel that was a patronizing response, because it came from the heart. I understand you're passionate about the game that you know and love, just as I am. If shooting a bit of negativity my way is a productive outlet, I'm happy to receive that negativity. I'm also happy to add your feedback or your suggestions to my feedback reports.
_Kradok_, on Jun 04 2018 - 09:58, said: Domo?? The afore-quoted interrogative statement begs a
response.... :crickets:DomoSapien: Unfortunately, there is information that I have at my disposal, and
there is information that I don't have access to. While I don't
design our sales, and I'm not in charge of marketing decisions,
there are things that I can do, such as compile feedback reports
regarding your sentiments about recent decisions and send them to
the folks who are in charge of these decisions.
While I am a single person, I have to be careful about precisely what it is I say because I am working in official capacity on behalf of my employer. If I don't have all the information, and I start speculating, I could be misrepresenting the facts. Spreading misinformation is definitely NOT something I want to do, so rather than make guesses as to why something is being done a certain way I prefer to take all your comments, add them to my report, and indicate that many players have expressed that they would like more information about the planned changes for Preferential MM Tanks.
While I am a single person, I have to be careful about precisely what it is I say because I am working in official capacity on behalf of my employer. If I don't have all the information, and I start speculating, I could be misrepresenting the facts. Spreading misinformation is definitely NOT something I want to do, so rather than make guesses as to why something is being done a certain way I prefer to take all your comments, add them to my report, and indicate that many players have expressed that they would like more information about the planned changes for Preferential MM Tanks.
Wtornado, on Jun 04 2018 - 10:03, said: You should of bought the new PTW KV-2 (R as in racing)WH40K tank
The low tiers will be swamped with this new PTW tank.
Oh PTW=Pay to win.DomoSapien:
Pay to win? It's literally the exact same tank as the Tech-tree version. Getting to the KV-2 on the Tech Tree isn't a particularly long or difficult grind, all things considered. So you could always do that and then win without paying
Pay to win? It's literally the exact same tank as the Tech-tree version. Getting to the KV-2 on the Tech Tree isn't a particularly long or difficult grind, all things considered. So you could always do that and then win without paying
Реклама | Adv