Developers posts on forum

Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Speles bagi
Link on message: #1322971

Mallbaro, on 18 January 2012 - 09:02 AM, said: Labdien man ir tads jautajums pa fps kad vins visu laiku leka pec pedeja apdeita sakas tada problema kad svarigakos momentos sausmigi leka fps un nevar neko izdarit cik esu dzirdejis tas nav man vienigajam bet daudziem cilvekiem fps apmeram leka no 40 un tad uz reiz uz 20 varbut var kautko ieteikt izdarit jo speli jau proveju parakstit
Paldies

Subject: Journal Hebdomadaire #13
Link on message: #1322633

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Клановый раздел\Постоянная чемпионская рота
Link on message: #1322589

Subject: Freeze ingame
Link on message: #1322534

Subject: Game Discussion\Newcomers' Forum\ccpgamer scam?
Link on message: #1322407

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Спам-уголок\Взвод - 143 боя, 97% побед
Link on message: #1322324

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Спам-уголок\Взвод - 143 боя, 97% побед
Link on message: #1322208

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Спам-уголок\Взвод - 143 боя, 97% побед
Link on message: #1321526

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Клановый раздел\Собираю среднюю роту
Link on message: #1321385

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320938

Dendy50, on 17 January 2012 - 08:00 PM, said: Hello Overlord,
will there be some historically and visually accurate maps like Battle for Kursk, El Alamein, Battle for Berlin, Paris, etc ??
Fighting near the Eiffel Tower would be awesome and something new for everyone
Thanks

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320930

StarDreamer, on 17 January 2012 - 06:40 PM, said: ...
Depending on how it goes. =)


Quote Short version: Stop asking questions about time. =)

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320924

HrD, on 17 January 2012 - 06:26 PM, said: Wait, you mean that we'll be able to ding faster than with the E100 ?
The 15cm gun of the E100 is only useful at close range, and a tank destroyer is not meant to be a close range fighter, you should know this
You need to consider giving a penetration buff to the JP E100 gun, even if it means a damage nerf, because sniping big tanks at long range with this gun is just not possible with such low penetration

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320352

posthumecaver, on 17 January 2012 - 04:14 PM, said: Good one
Any chance we get a warning before the database backups made for the public testing of 7.2....
I want to definitely have the T34 in the garage to test the conversion process (750 000 silver missing me at the moment to buy it )

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320348

Heinzi, on 17 January 2012 - 05:24 PM, said: Did you raise repair costs for the T20 by about 25% in the latest update?
If so, was there any specific reason for doing that? There is nothing in the patch notes sadly.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320346

Xaxaos, on 17 January 2012 - 04:00 PM, said: 1. Will have T110 weak-points in front hull and turrent ?
2. What will be difference between current T30 and T110 ?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320332

trispect, on 17 January 2012 - 03:27 PM, said: Hmm ok. So the problem is then the issue that matchmaker just picks random tanks from queue (within set tier spread) and distributes them randomly. If there are very much tanks of same type in queue they can stack on to one side. I guess it would make things very complicated if matchmaker would have to execute specific rules while it creates teams.
One further question that I remembered:
Q: When you have big enough playerbase do you plan to reduce tier spread in random games? (To max3 or 2 tiers) It would make game much enjoyable and fair for lower tiers and also raise the challenge of high tier games. In high tier games the matches are practically max 10vs10 when you can just disregard the last 5 tanks.
I was under impression that this is very commonly known issue... Of course I can open ticket concerning this.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320320

Snib, on 17 January 2012 - 03:24 PM, said: Overlord, short question regarding the spotting system. When you fire a vehicle's gun, the vehicle's camo rating gets reduced by the invisibilityFactorAtShot of the gun. Now my question is, what is the duration of this reduction?
Thanks.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320313

Tank_Killer1, on 17 January 2012 - 02:45 PM, said: Overlord
The valentine tank ingame uses a Russian 45mm gun. I was under the impression that the Russian equipped a 76mm to some valentines. Where did the 45mm come from I can't find any info about the gun?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1320304

marko4231, on 17 January 2012 - 02:44 PM, said: Arent tank destroyers suposed to have better guns than tanks? So why does E100jagdpanzer get only E100 gun?
Is it too soon to even try to talk about E100 stug?
Edit: i see somebody asked the same thing a few posts above, delete question if you must.

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Спам-уголок\Тема, в которой Ник Лемос сравнивает...
Link on message: #1320194

NikLemos, on 17 January 2012 - 05:04 PM, said: Вообще скажу тебе как старший товарищ, что в самой жизни нет никакого смысла, в понтах и рисовках тоже, однако как приятно забраться на неприступную вершину, на которую ещё никто не забирался. Зачем? А просто так!

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1319260

icecat, on 17 January 2012 - 01:59 PM, said: 1) Why did you change so drastically ballance of tier X heavy tanks? IS-7 is now almost immortal but still have deadly gun. Germany lazzy boxes are still slow, armour is still same but guns are much worse.
2) What sort of funny roulette we have instead of matchmaking now?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1319251

trispect, on 17 January 2012 - 01:44 PM, said: Q1: I don't think I have seen any explanation to this MM phenomenon: Why matchmaker seem to want stacking multiple same tanks on the one side instead of distributing them evenly on both sides? And do you plan to fix this at some point? (6 tank destroyers at one side and none at the other side instead of 3and3 distribution OR 6 type59's on one side and one side have 2 instead of 4and4)
Q2: Do you plan to fix the bug (which appeared months ago in some patch) anytime soon where when you are side-to-side contact with object or another tank and enter sniper mode your turret will flip 180 degrees?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1319118

cover_man, on 17 January 2012 - 12:56 PM, said: Q: Is it possible to confirm by 100%, that we will have US tree tech change in 7.2 ?
- T34 change to a premium tank (for all of players which have them)
- M103 and T110 introduction

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1319111

FreemanBGD, on 17 January 2012 - 12:15 PM, said: What about T23? Any info on it's return?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318890

Maurer, on 17 January 2012 - 09:46 AM, said: Interesting. And earlier you said:
So, comparing Stug E100 to Jadgtiger:
HP pool: E100 >= JT
Weapon: E100 = JT
Armor E100 >>> JT
So it seems to me that the only thing that remains to balance Stug E100 with JT is to crippled E100's mobility a lot, buff JT somehow or give JT better matchmaking. Can you say what is your idea to balance those two?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318886

Waroch, on 17 January 2012 - 12:35 AM, said: Q : OL, When will you decide to get us rid of that stupid stock turret on the ARL44?
Only two turrets were ever considered for this tank : a temporary ACL1 turret for the first prototypes with the US 76mm (which should be its legitimate stock turret in game), and the Schneider turret (current top turret, which is right) which was used in production and which could handle the much more important recoil of 90mm or larger caliber gun (120mm planned at one moment).
What we have in game is a turret from the 1940 FCM F1 wooden mockup. That turret was NEVER-EVER built, and was not destined to any tank other than the FCM F1 in the avant-projet. And it was so absurd that it was abandoned later on even for the FCM F1. Actually Schneider developped a new turret during the occupation, which is the turret used on the ARL44.
Currently it looks like somebody got drunk with cheap vodka and somehow mixed up words he read on an article "ARL 44... Turret... Schneider... FCM F1... DA da, got it" - copy - paste.
Can you do anything to fix it up, please?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318856

ELharen, on 17 January 2012 - 06:11 AM, said: "Starting from Thursday, January 12th, 06:30 GMT until Tuesday, January 17th, 06:00 GMT, enter the game to sample the opportunities."
But it stopped at 5gmt. my last battles only gave 2x anymore
Why say 1 time and use another time ingame?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318747

Comrade_Rory, on 16 January 2012 - 11:19 PM, said: Q: Any plans on adding the long 105mm to the VK4502A? Any at all?
Seems to make sense really as firepower and armour is not a suitable trade off for just speed. That way you can go for speed or armour when choosing between the Tiger II or VK4502A.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318740

skaerials, on 16 January 2012 - 11:14 PM, said: USA heavies been announced! and is7 is not that good! get one and find out!
Q. What has happened to chuchill armour values, have they been messed up?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318718

Celestial, on 16 January 2012 - 05:21 PM, said: Overlord, I have a few questions:
Currently, compared to the Obj. 704 and T-95, the Jagdtiger is considered the weakest of the 3 tier IX TD's, mainly because the hull is way to easily penetrated by anything it encounters.
1. Is the hull (upper plate/lower plate) from the JT just as thick as the King Tiger at the moment?
2. Can is be considered to buff the JT in hull armor, as at the moment the 250mm citadel is rather useless because most of it is covered by the gun mantlet, as well as that the hull seems so weak, that even tier VIII easily penetrate the upper hull?
The hull should be at least just as thick as the KT, if not a bit more. Everyone agrees if the lower hull would be a weakspot, but at the moment even the upper plate is easily penetrated.

Subject: Changements dans la boutique en jeu : le Type 59
Link on message: #1318716

DMII, on 17 January 2012 - 12:12 PM, said: ouais bah c'est cool d'être fier d'avoir pété un tier 7 avec ton tier 9  

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318622

ahdan, on 16 January 2012 - 05:28 PM, said: CN is going to release Type62 tomorrow(1/17), will it be available on EU/NA/RU too?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318615

Mungo73, on 16 January 2012 - 05:02 PM, said: Are there any plans for new premium Tier 8 mediums as well? Or only heavies and TDs?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1318608

_Strider_, on 16 January 2012 - 04:44 PM, said: I have a question about the 150mm, will it be 150 L/68 or will it be something else?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Repair costs - is there a list somewhere?
Link on message: #1318433

TankkiPoju, on 17 January 2012 - 07:49 AM, said: "EULA breaking site?" I bet they are trembling in their pants. Although I agree the numbers are pretty much their own imagination.
Did you know WG EULA is not actually valid in EU countries, except in British Isles? It's because WG does not provide the EULA for people's mother tongue. For example, I'm Finnish and I could just easily say I didn't understand a word of the EULA since it was in English.
Consumer laws FTW and all that.
Further more, even if the EULA was valid, it's just some civil contract. You are not breaking any laws if you do not comply with it.


Quote IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ CAREFULLY! BY INSTALLING, COPYING, OR OTHERWISE USING OUR GAME(S) OR SERVICE(S) IN ANY MANNER, YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND PRIVACY POLICY.
IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH OUR END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT, PLEASE DO NOT PROCEED WITH THE REGISTRATION PROCESS AND LEAVE OUR SITES IMMEDIATELY AND DO NOT ACCESS OR USE OUR WEBISTE(S), GAME(S), OR SERVICE(S).

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1315331

 Virtus, on 16 January 2012 - 03:56 PM, said: I will ask more precisely. Will, for example 1st new crew perk will require same amount of exp to develop like current 1st crew perk?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1315328

 cominu, on 16 January 2012 - 03:09 PM, said: hello
i've read most of the post but couldnt find it
about vk3601, when it will be changed to heavy?
are the tankers going to be trained from medium to heavy without skill loss ?
is it difference if they are in tank or they are in barracks (as in sold the tank but kept the tankers)
regards

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1315321

 L3gi, on 16 January 2012 - 02:52 PM, said: question to that:
1. how many skills will it be if you want to skill everything?
2. is it considered of the game machanics that somebody is able to reach all skills maxed out in a "normal" amount of time?
3. how many games does somebody will need to do so? more likely 300, 1000 or 5000 with same crew?
4. do you consider to change the system of leveling crew? maybe change the system to a more comfortable one for frequent players? or making a crew able to drive more than one tank, keep talent to drive earlier learned tanks or something compareable?
thanks for your answers

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1315293

 Detonator, on 16 January 2012 - 01:25 PM, said: Can you explain further how credit income has changed as a result of the patch? And which Tier or Tanks it mainly effects?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1315236

LegionXXXVII, on 16 January 2012 - 10:00 AM, said: Overlord,
First off Thank You for answering our questions and I hope mine is not redundant.
I know 7.3 is still a few months out but do you know what the tentative plan is for the replacement of the tier 9 IS-4 is? I’ve heard the Object 252 (aka IS-6) will be premium and another Object/IS will take its place. Possible the Object 730/IS-10/T-10. I know this has been discussed in other forum post but it all seems to be rumors. You have made post in your blog but that was a while ago and I know some things have changed.
Also, will having the IS-7 already researched and owned be of any help?