Developers posts on forum

Subject: Serveur de test de v.0.6.7 UPDATE
Link on message: #873924

Flokiller94, on 05 September 2011 - 04:05 PM, said: Comment peut on essayer la version 0.67 svp ?
J'ai copier le dossier etc, fait la mise a jour et j'ai voulu me connecter, mais il me dis que je suis dans le server européen et le jeu en version américaine, je refait toute la manip en prenant le patch européen, pareil, je crée un compte américain et j'ai un message d'erreur, en russe, donc j'aimerais savoir, s'il vous plait, comment puis-je remédier a cela ?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #873767

sharky91, on 05 September 2011 - 03:30 PM, said: On the update topic I noticed this:
Any more information?

Subject: Action sur Twitter! Les résultats
Link on message: #873749

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #873581

Jager123, on 05 September 2011 - 01:32 PM, said: Hi
Question: Will there be a chance to see airplanes or hear Ju 87 Stuka?
Second: will we hear more in game battle sounds, in the future?
Third: Any chance to drive on minefield or place out mines in future?

Subject: Wargaming.net télé
Link on message: #873269

Subject: L'interview sur World of Warplanes par MMOCrunch
Link on message: #873206

Subject: Impulse Gamer, la revue
Link on message: #873172

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #873170

Wriothesley, on 05 September 2011 - 10:12 AM, said: Q: Is it allowd to use best gun in M24 in 1st turret? If no, can you consider to allow it (with some penalties, like lower ROF)? The second turret is... fo #$#@$ ugly!!!
And also, the 2nd turret it oversized - will it be rescaled?

]http://img269.images...92/chaffee5.jpg

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #873074

StanislavKus, on 05 September 2011 - 11:45 AM, said: Do you realize that it will be spammed to death?
Or will it perhaps have a cooldown? Like once every 10 secs?
I'm not looking forward to 15 mins of constant AOOOOGAAA AOOOGAAAA (and yes, that's my interpretation of a horn)

Subject: Serveur de test de v.0.6.7 UPDATE
Link on message: #873033

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #873010

Wriothesley, on 05 September 2011 - 11:04 AM, said: Q:
1) How is horn going to work... like console command on chat (like /horn)?
2) Can we also have /facepalm, with some nice animation barrel hitting top-front of turret?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #873002

FrankyK, on 05 September 2011 - 10:33 AM, said: A horn for a tank? What is the purpose of this feature? A horn is useful for a car, but for a tank?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #873000

Marty_van_der_Kriton, on 05 September 2011 - 10:09 AM, said: Supercool
Q: Will the horn be heard also by enemy? Will it help them to spot you?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #872997

grdja, on 05 September 2011 - 10:10 AM, said: Yeey for horns! What every bad driver surrounded with equally bad drivers needs! Could you also include option to roll down windows and start a shouting/insult match ?
On a serious note.
When is 0.6.7 expected? When will Test 2 update of this patch come to test server?

Subject: News from the Front\Careers\Accounting Manager
Link on message: #872827

Subject: News from the Front\Careers\Online Marketing Manager
Link on message: #872825

Subject: News from the Front\Careers\Community Manager
Link on message: #872815

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #872567

 Wriothesley, on 05 September 2011 - 08:39 AM, said: This is about the incoming 0.6.7 patch or the next one? You keep changing the numeration all the time so I have hard time to get what patch you are talking about.
Can you also check questions about the incoming patch and historical battles details some pages before? We can't bump them without ban and it seems you missed them.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #872525

 XenomorphZeta, on 03 September 2011 - 01:29 PM, said: Whats going to be in the 0.7.0 patch then...

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #872514

 han_solo_79, on 04 September 2011 - 11:19 AM, said: Also no M103 and M110, no new russian tanks, no map selector, no improved statistics ingame (scout, which tank killed most, time of play etc), no arty limit and no nonarty game mod, no MM tierspread selector (wide, tight), no new medals and achievements... Guys, seriously we like new tanks and new maps but game still lacks user-friendliness. It's like 30 years old Lada (with round reflectors, niceeeee) with nails in the driver's seat and new stereo set... Got style but it's comfortable for short range trips.
Lada is a great vehicle, do not know where did yours got nails from though.
WARNING: This thread is strictly moderated.
Moderation rules for this topic:
1) Any kind of spam, flooding, off-topic comment = 5 days of read-only ban
By posting in this thread you accept and agree with current moderation rules.
5 days of forum read-only ban issued
Lia

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #872505

 Just1ce, on 04 September 2011 - 09:55 PM, said: Overlord when i asked you about WoWP forums you said soon but still no forums. When EU/US will have forums or is it only for the russians?(the game)

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #872502

 chanss, on 04 September 2011 - 07:21 PM, said: http://www.youtube.c...feature=related
I am envying you guys, I also like to have a striper lapdance, and a shot o' vodka on my lunchbreak.
Got any positions for a computer literate? I can do 'select * from sysibm.sysdummy1' real good. Give me call, you wont regret it...
Bet that readheaded database needs a bit of reorganization.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #872499

 Kazomir, on 04 September 2011 - 07:10 PM, said: Overlord, do the devs consider tweaking the artilerry to balance the fact that they dont have tracers now? They dont need to move at all. Maybe reducing range?

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Балтийская Лига\Baltic League приглашает
Link on message: #870505

DarkComrade_RUS_, on 03 September 2011 - 09:54 PM, said: почему за основу взяли формат Esl? Куда подевались чемпионаты 15 на 15

Subject: In-Game Vehicles\Vehicle Comparison\Best Tanks Per Tier
Link on message: #869581

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Do you want to become EU moderator?
Link on message: #868737

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #867754

Snib, on 03 September 2011 - 12:18 PM, said: Physics update is planned for 0.7.0, which, last I heard, is delayed due to WG waiting for an engine update from BigWorld.
...

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #867745

panzerdav, on 03 September 2011 - 10:26 AM, said: Overlord
I have a suggestion. I've just read that there will a 6 and 12 month premium option coming out soon. If this is true, I have a nidea that may add a good incentive for those people who are willing to pay over 40 odd pounds, Euros to get either of these accounts. Could it be possible for these account holders to get a X5 xp bonus for the first win of the day and X2 bonus for their second win of the day. this will help to reduce the grind feeling and may make more people willing to purchase the longer accounts.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\WoT is going in completely wrong direction
Link on message: #867598

captainInsano, on 03 September 2011 - 12:07 PM, said: I really really don't get this at all. To start with, why implement a chinese tank at all? Chinas part in WW2 was less than small, they got invaded by Japan in the 30's and not much happened during WW2. Chinas part in WW2 is meager to say the least. When it comes to Chinese manufacturing im no expert on the issue, but im quite sure that the Chinese didn't have any own designs at all. Most equipment they had were early 30's imports from Germany and Britain.
A quick google result showed that US sent 36 M3A1 scouts (note that this is NOT the M3 Stuart that the US line has in WoT, its an armored CAR nothing else) as a lend-lease action. In 1944 a Tank Group consisting of lend-lease M4A4 (version after E8), M3 Stuarts and some Bren Carriers (Which are APCs not tanks btw) went into action in Burma.
That's more or less all that it is to it. So why then even bother to implement China into the game? It makes no sense at all! Especially not when you have to relate on designs made almost 15 years after WW2 to implement chinese designs. Fine if you want to expand the russian tree, but there are shitloads of other vehicles from nations that actually played a part and had their own designs.
The downside is that most other nations with own designs are axis vehicles. It would be so much more suitable to implement vehicles from the following nations instead:
* Britain (there are still shitloads of VERY common british WW2 tanks that isn't in the game)
* Italy
* France
* Japan
* Czechoslovakia
* Poland
(even Sweden had own designs, ie. Strv m/42. But then sweden was a "neutral" country)
Fine, most designs were crap imho but at least they had several outfits. China had none, and even the Type 59 was a russian T-54/55 re-design. Honestly, the game is starting to get more and more weird. The game-info clearly states "Throw yourself into the epic tank battles of World War II". I understand that WoT has to handle gamebalance as they implement new vehicles...BUT...Why not focus on actual tanks instead of implementing after-WW2 tanks? It started with T-54, IS-4 (which at least were designed during ww2, although wasn't manufactured until afterwards) and the IS-7 (clearly after WW2). Then it started to go downhill...fast!
Why oh why implement vehicles that wasn't manufactured until '50s-60's? The M46 Patton wasn't in production until 1950 but even worse...For crying out loud, the M103 was made in 1957(!) and was active until mid 80's. Now they decide to go even further and throws in the Type 59 which came as late as 1958.
Please listen to me, i honestly think you are driving this game too far. The concept is about WW2, you are now going far far away from that concept rapidly. I do NOT understand why you decide to implement heavier and heavier tanks. Just to be able to do that you have to get tanks that came 10-15 years AFTER ww2. Why even bother? You are honestly looking at it from the wrong point-of-view. Why not go from the OTHER way around, i mean there are so many tanks from the WW2 era. Wouldn't it be better to implement those actual designs. Fine, most are early ones but still there are lots of them. I don't see why you need to expand the tech-trees further up, after all there are several ACTUAL tanks that still can be implemented.
Just think about it, i'll give you just ONE example:
Britain
* Cruiser Mk IVA, light tank
* Crusader, medium tank
* Cromwell, medium tank
* Comet (A34), medium tank
* Challenger, medium tank
* Centurion w. 20 pounder, MBT
* Matilda, light tank
* Valentine, medium tank
* Churchill, medium/heavy tank
* Archer, tank destroyer
* Tortoise, tank destroyer/Heavy tank
All vehicles above would fit the game dead-on. These all fit from low- to high tiers with ease. Ie. MkIV tier 1-2 and all the way to Centurion in tier 9-10 (hard to balance due to in-game inaccuracy based on realism). As i said, this is just ONE country mentioned.
I could probably list 20 other vehicles with ease from various countries. So why the hell don't WG focus on actual WW2 tanks instead of vehicles that are either pure paper-prototypes or tanks that were made 10-15 years AFTER the war? There were shitloads of vehicles made between 1930's up 'til 1945. WG, please don't lose your grip on reality and the WW2 factor. Don't make it fiction/completely unrealistic...please! As i said, the tech-tree doesn't have to expand upwards it could be expanded from below instead...

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Official 0.6.6 SPG / Arty Thread
Link on message: #867592

Rayth, on 03 September 2011 - 01:57 AM, said: Why do you kill this game, why ?...

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Клановый раздел\The RED: Раш по центру
Link on message: #867107

Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Балтийская Лига\Baltic League приглашает
Link on message: #867097

Subject: Sandblasted
Link on message: #867033

Baine, on 02 September 2011 - 10:48 PM, said: Ah, the silence.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Official 0.6.6 SPG / Arty Thread
Link on message: #866833

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #866145

Fimp3n, on 02 September 2011 - 05:10 PM, said: I agree that a mention somewhere would be suitable, but celebrate the outbreak of a war with an event?

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #866130

Pawelvc, on 02 September 2011 - 04:54 PM, said: Cause for Russian war began in 17 September..


Fimp3n, on 02 September 2011 - 05:09 PM, said: Wargaming.net is not a russian company.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #866122

hornbeam, on 02 September 2011 - 04:38 PM, said: WHAT?
Questions
1. Are you saying that beginning of WWII isn't as memorable as Kursk operation?
2. Are you saying that beginning of WWII isn't memorable enough to mention it in news? (most people agree that any discount on that ocasion might be not the best idea, but information in news section and in game client doesn't cost a dime.
3. Are you saying that beginning of WWII isn't as memorable as "AtomicMPC: Top Five World of Tanks Tips"? That was one of game and news informations from 01.09.
4. Are you saying that beginning of WWII was local event?
Overlord, I have much respect for you and your job, but please think before you say something like that.
EDIT: Wriothesley questions were about news and informations, not events with discounts on tanks or modules (like the ones we had).


Wriothesley, on 02 September 2011 - 04:41 PM, said: I think his comment was about Battle of Studzianki.


hornbeam, on 02 September 2011 - 04:45 PM, said: If that was answer to Battle of Studzianki - ok. But it wasn't clear enough (at least for me).
But still there is a question about beginning of WWII - why there was no info about it? No event, no discount - information and reminder.

Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehniskā palīdzība\Lokalizacijas kludas un bagi
Link on message: #866077

Jarro, on 02 September 2011 - 06:10 PM, said: Lai kaujas laikā izsauktu palīdzības logu, nospiediet "F1".
Komandā artilērijai ir lielākais spēks.

Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehniskā palīdzība\Lokalizacijas kludas un bagi
Link on message: #865888

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Your Worst Tank
Link on message: #865862