T110's Northern Migration
Дата: 18.09.2017 05:06:36
ThatTrafficCone, on Sep 17 2017 - 17:57, said: Oh yeah, there are definitely problems with it that I'm well
aware of. I'm not particularly happy about the T162 Concept and its
immediate predecessors, for instance. But this is simply a what-if
that aims to cram as many tanks into the game as possible, in a way
that both respects the tanks being represented and minds that this
is in fact a video game, and I think I've been able to reasonably
achieve that. I just need to keep writing articles there to explain
my points.
Life_In_Black, on Sep 17 2017 - 19:06, said: Yeah, I might do that then. It's been a while. I still don't like the fact that MeatheadMilitia acknowledged this guy's tree, even though The_Chieftain completely ignored the number of us from this thread (myself, Super_Noodle, CK16, and others who have been advocating this sort of thing for years now. No wonder the NA community is dying off.
The_Chieftain: I think you may have to sacrifice some numbers of vehicles
to allow for 'same vehicle research'. For example, you have M53 and
M55 as separate tiers. OK, I understand that on the face of it, one
is an 8" gun, one is a 6" gun. But is the difference in capability
really worth a tier given they both fit in at IX right
now? The current M46 turret upgrade is M47, what is the M46 or
M47 upgrade path in this tech tree? One can make the same
comment with the M36 and M36B1, or especially T53 and T53E1.
Outside of, say, HP, what about T53E1 makes it worth a full tier
higher than T53?
Life_In_Black, on Sep 17 2017 - 19:06, said: Yeah, I might do that then. It's been a while. I still don't like the fact that MeatheadMilitia acknowledged this guy's tree, even though The_Chieftain completely ignored the number of us from this thread (myself, Super_Noodle, CK16, and others who have been advocating this sort of thing for years now. No wonder the NA community is dying off.
The_Chieftain: In fairness, what does his acknowledgement do? There is very little
in TrafficCone's tree which we haven't already looked at, tried to
send up to Minsk, or in some cases, planned to implement,
built the 3D model, and then scrapped it. I don't know why
Meathead singled out TrafficCone's tree for comment. Doesn't mean
it's any more likely to gain traction than trees put forward by
LiB, CK, myself, or anyone else.
T110's Northern Migration