M4 Sherman "The Right Tank for the Wrong War"
Дата: 13.09.2017 21:15:05
BillT, on Sep 13 2017 - 17:19, said: To me, Christie's work isn't just about the suspension
system. His tanks were also outstandingly fast, and his T3 design
implemented sloped front armor as well. But my main point is
that his design evolved into the T-34, which was indisputably the
best tank of 1940 and arguably the best tank of WWII. If the
US had held onto Christie, we could have had an American
T-34. The question boils down to this: Was the T-34
superior to the Sherman? Most tank buffs would
immediately answer "Yes". I'm not convinced, because like you
I don't swallow all the Cooper-esque hatred of the M4.
But I still have to admit that the T-34 was better in 1940 and '41
(before the Sherman entered service), and it had several superb
features. So I'm inclined to think that an American-developed
T-34, combining its profile and armor layout with American
mechanical parts and ergonomics, would have been better than either
the Sherman or the T-34.
The_Chieftain: Mmm... I take your points, though I'm not sure I find them
convincing. Yes, the T-34 is arguably the best tank in the world in
1940/41. I think, though, one must also investigate the question of
why the US wasn't using the designs. Yes, I know that Christie was
a bit difficult to work with, but does that invalidate the reasons
that the US Army may have stuck with the bogies, such as rugged
reliability and internal space? Again, if there was ever any one
country which sacrificed anything necessary in terms of capability
to make sure that the tank built would do what it was
expected to do as effectively as possible at all times, it was
the US. One might also inquire as to how US tank design may have
progressed had they had the impetus of being a continental power
without the safety provided by an ocean secured by a large Navy,
even given the fiscal constraints the US Army was under in the
1930s. Perhaps the US tank of 1940 might actually be a bit better
than the M2 Medium which it had, though there are equally arguments
that it wouldn't have given the thinking behind US tank design
requirements. After all, the 37mm was a perfectly reasonable
anti-tank gun, a position generally shared by Germany and the UK at
the time, after all. Fundamentally, the question is
"If the US could have had a T-34 of its own in 1940, would it have
chosen to do so, or would it still have built something different?"
I don't know if there truly is an answer to that counterfactual.
M4 Sherman "The Right Tank for the Wrong War"