Kampfpanzer III/Napoleon I
Дата: 06.03.2015 14:34:52
LoooSeR78V, on Mar 06 2015 - 12:20, said: That AMX-30B have a name of Russian city on it, which is strange
for me to see. Imagine an Abrams tank with big inscription
"KIROV" on its frontal turret armor.
shapeshifter, on Mar 06 2015 - 05:18, said: I wonder where Hunnicutt got his numbers.
LoooSeR78V, on Mar 06 2015 - 11:11, said: Can anybody translate what they are talking about Napoleon tank from 4:50?
The_Chieftain: As far as I know, the US never captured Kirov.
shapeshifter, on Mar 06 2015 - 05:18, said: I wonder where Hunnicutt got his numbers.
The_Chieftain: Characteristics Sheets. Sometimes known as Ordnance Form
50s. I am on the road so don't specifically have the T29 series
ones handy, but they look like this. One page, two sides, always.
As I recall, the specsheets in Hunnicutt match those of the T29
series Forms 50. They're a handy reference, but we have chosen to
rank the forms 50 as less in reliability than a test report or
operator's manual when it comes to the data.
LoooSeR78V, on Mar 06 2015 - 11:11, said: Can anybody translate what they are talking about Napoleon tank from 4:50?
The_Chieftain: Earlier on, they're saying that in 1980 a multi-national
team was formed for the development of a new tank with four main
characteristics: Information, firepower, armament, mobility, and
that the tank was to be designed under the presumption it would
have to fight at 3:1 outnumbered. However, at 4:50, they say that
the only German concession to the French in the project was the
name of the tank: Napoleon.
See http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/282055-kampfpanzer-iiinapoleon-i/
Kampfpanzer III/Napoleon I