Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Kampfpanzer III/Napoleon I

Дата: 06.03.2015 14:34:52
View PostLoooSeR78V, on Mar 06 2015 - 12:20, said: That AMX-30B have a name of Russian city on it, which is strange for me to see. Imagine an Abrams tank with big inscription "KIROV" on its frontal turret armor.:teethhappy:

The_Chieftain:   As far as I know, the US never captured Kirov.   

View Postshapeshifter, on Mar 06 2015 - 05:18, said: I wonder where Hunnicutt got his numbers.    

The_Chieftain:   Characteristics Sheets. Sometimes known as Ordnance Form 50s. I am on the road so don't specifically have the T29 series ones handy, but they look like this. One page, two sides, always. As I recall, the specsheets in Hunnicutt match those of the T29 series Forms 50. They're a handy reference, but we have chosen to rank the forms 50 as less in reliability than a test report or operator's manual when it comes to the data.  

View PostLoooSeR78V, on Mar 06 2015 - 11:11, said:     Can anybody translate what they are talking about Napoleon tank from 4:50? 

The_Chieftain:   Earlier on, they're saying that in 1980 a multi-national team was formed for the development of a new tank with four main characteristics: Information, firepower, armament, mobility, and that the tank was to be designed under the presumption it would have to fight at 3:1 outnumbered. However, at 4:50, they say that the only German concession to the French in the project was the name of the tank: Napoleon.   See http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/282055-kampfpanzer-iiinapoleon-i/

Реклама | Adv