US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Дата: 19.12.2010 09:19:50
PzGrenKdr, on 19 December 2010 - 02:07 AM, said: i onyl said this 1 time, not everytime. Mhm maybe later additional
armour could be added to tanks like sandbags, skirts, spaced
armour(Vorpanzer) and addtional(improved) armour. Come on jcqc96,
you know me from BKI know the effect of fixed and multi-piece amo, but like i said, the T15E2 ingame have a high RoF.
Come on jcqc96, you know me from BK, i know how weapons work and i`am only against Super-Pershing as T9 tank.
@MrVic: could you give a statement why the Super-Pershing shouldn´t be T8 and as link between Pershing and T32(like the VK3001H)?
MrVic: Mainly the issue I see with that is permitting a parallel move at
tier 8 probably would not make progression through the tree very
fluid. Tier 8 tends to be the top end of championship and some
battle setups. So making a move between the 2 could be bad. Tho
with a hefty exp cost it could be plausible.
As for the history side of things. The T32 shared many components with the M26 road wheels basic hull design ect. But as the hull was lengthened and the frontal hull up armored and redesigned and a new turret design the lineage between the 2 exists but is not as pronounced as it would be with a Super Pershing or the Heavy Super Pershing.
Tho not saying it not possible. But I left out links like that due to Tier 8 and above links so far being limited to the same tank class trees.
Also shared parts does not alway lead to a link between trees but does offer a historical reason to provide a link if it fits progression or tech tree flow.
Couple examples. M24 Chaffee, M37 (same hull as the M24) , M41 (Same hull as the M24) Priest was based off the M3 Lee/Grant Hull. One thing the US did alot was made many variations off of base hulls or reinvented them for other roles when they were nearing obsolete.
But the idea is good if it would work out for the flow of things.
For reference Picture of a T32, The pershing was much smaller and only had 6 road wheels, The T32 used a redesigned M26 hull and enlarged for 7 road wheels.
As for the history side of things. The T32 shared many components with the M26 road wheels basic hull design ect. But as the hull was lengthened and the frontal hull up armored and redesigned and a new turret design the lineage between the 2 exists but is not as pronounced as it would be with a Super Pershing or the Heavy Super Pershing.
Tho not saying it not possible. But I left out links like that due to Tier 8 and above links so far being limited to the same tank class trees.
Also shared parts does not alway lead to a link between trees but does offer a historical reason to provide a link if it fits progression or tech tree flow.
Couple examples. M24 Chaffee, M37 (same hull as the M24) , M41 (Same hull as the M24) Priest was based off the M3 Lee/Grant Hull. One thing the US did alot was made many variations off of base hulls or reinvented them for other roles when they were nearing obsolete.
But the idea is good if it would work out for the flow of things.
For reference Picture of a T32, The pershing was much smaller and only had 6 road wheels, The T32 used a redesigned M26 hull and enlarged for 7 road wheels.
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements