The Deceit of WG
Дата: 13.06.2018 22:39:53
RRR3, on Jun 13 2018 - 13:24, said: Yeah WG was not clear at all in their "adjustment" post of the
soviet vehicles with regards to the Object 277. But I mean what did
you expect from WG, just look at the June 11 Incident, and now WG
totally denies it and will not compensate. I was so excited to see
a top tier heavy with APCR but noo. Some how WG's history suddenly
changed, and they discovered the 277 didn't fire APCR. It is all a
big joke as usual, please gib your wallets.DomoSapien: We definitely are not denying the June 11th server
issues.
CabbageMechanic merged all the server issue threads into a megathread, pinned that thread at the top of General Discussion, and provided real-time updates - (Also mentioned that we are discussing compensation and we will report back as soon as we have an update)
I pinned a notice to the top of the news and information subforum, and updated when the issue was resolved. - Also linked back to Cabbage's Post that mentions we're looking at compensation
There were also two iterations of common test, the second of which had the current vehicle parameters up for testing. (with the exception of the HEAT round, I believe? Could be wrong there.) Not making any claims about whether or not the changes were warranted because I have not had a chance to test the 277, but I know there were plenty of folks in the CT threads voicing concerns about the 277 overperforming. We'll see how it fares on the live server
CabbageMechanic merged all the server issue threads into a megathread, pinned that thread at the top of General Discussion, and provided real-time updates - (Also mentioned that we are discussing compensation and we will report back as soon as we have an update)
I pinned a notice to the top of the news and information subforum, and updated when the issue was resolved. - Also linked back to Cabbage's Post that mentions we're looking at compensation
There were also two iterations of common test, the second of which had the current vehicle parameters up for testing. (with the exception of the HEAT round, I believe? Could be wrong there.) Not making any claims about whether or not the changes were warranted because I have not had a chance to test the 277, but I know there were plenty of folks in the CT threads voicing concerns about the 277 overperforming. We'll see how it fares on the live server
The Deceit of WG