Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Meet the Staff: CabbageMechanic

Дата: 24.07.2017 23:52:25
View PostMudman24, on Jul 21 2017 - 15:23, said: As many of us have argued, it actually has 1 purpose that works very well. It helps the uninformed make a quick judgement about gameplay opinions. When we had negs, I could have told players in the newcomers forum that they should put spall liners on all their light tanks. The post would have lit up red and people would have moved along, knowing i was a troll or an idiot. Now I could make that post and get 10 green upvotes, probably indicating to some that it's a good idea. This is why it worked well and why many of us want it. 

CabbageMechanic:   I'll take that into consideration, I can see value in having a quick reference available, but I question whether the volume of bad advice is so large that it cannot be responded to with a constructive response explaining why it isn't good.  

Otter_von_Bismarck  That's fine, the more input we get the better. So long as there's an actual skill requirement to participate. Someone with 50k battles and 10k posts who's still awful at the game will contribute nothing worthwhile. 

CabbageMechanic:   I disagree entirely, there is plenty of feedback regarding lots of different things about the game that could be useful from someone with that much experience.  For game balance purposes? Probably not - but you don't have to be good at the game to have quality input regarding a confusing aspect of the garage UI or the contents of a Premium Shop deal.  Naturally, for more specialized items like CW or Ranked certain player group's feedback should be weighed more heavily, but I am focused on quality and constructive feedback on all aspects of the game, which I don't believe will be limited to the best players.
 

Silvers_  Also could we get more than a day or less notice on when events etc go on? You should have an idea of how long our you are planning things like tournaments, the RETURN OF CW's and Campaigns than a day or so. If you could maybe post a 2-3 month timetable of things you have planned for the community that would be great.

TBH most of us are getting tired of no warning or very little warning of when something happens.

CabbageMechanic:  
I can see why you find that frustrating and will pass that along as general feedback.  I will say that a 2-3 month timeline is a little unrealistic because things that far out are frequently tentative and subject to change, but I think more advance notice of significant events like those is a reasonable request.  

slashngut21  Is wot going to bring back customer support?

CabbageMechanic:  
Customer Support is alive and well, are you experiencing an issue you are having trouble contacting them about?  

poppavein  2. Have you seen how Eve Online gets feedback?  The players vote in representatives annually to the CSM. These reps sign an NDA and Eve discusses the future directions with them. In WoT, we get the feeling of being ignored and the design decisions lately do not make sense. Feels like a Russian culture issue. 

CabbageMechanic:   I am familiar with Eve (played it for a few years in the good ol' days), and that's a fair criticism.  I don't know if an identical process is possible for WoT, but I can at least account for the collection and submission of NA feedback.
 

Реклама | Adv