Ranked Battles: What's the Meta?
Дата: 23.10.2019 19:10:19
restore, on 23 October 2019 - 02:42 PM, said: So if most of the meta vehicles were ruled out, what exactly is
point of this article? Its out of touch with reality and i wonder
if you are trying to lie to yourself or just lie to players like
always.
SlyMeerkat, on 23 October 2019 - 02:43 PM, said: Even more sad that you removed SirFoch comment because he was stating the truth, yet more typical BS from WG and their Snowflakes.... Dont worry though, hopefully it will bite back real hard one day because it sure is going that way.
Lorensoth, on 23 October 2019 - 03:02 PM, said: I was sure ppl at WG have not been playing game past few year aswell. No wonder why some of their favorite tanks are like still Maus etc. Someone should remind them, at some point they did add things like Fv4201, 279e that made even tanks like 907 or 260 looked somewhat balanced. Oh btw, that "grand rebalance" thingies that they mentioned like, 4-5 year ago, still haven't happened either. So we still have "better ammo", absurdly high rng on every calculations and clickers combination that ruin any type of competitive play. Like some of reasons why they stopped competitive WoT years ago. Yep, they are still in game.
thePhilX: The article also states the reason why special Tier X
vehicles weren't used for the article. Many players not having
those special vehicles leads to a situation where those players
have to look, what other tanks could be played. So what
exactly is the point of this article: 1) you get info about
the top 5 most successful tech tree tanks of this mode2) you get a
recommendation for several tanks and alternatives to them, which
might work out for you3) there are guides and manuals linked on how
those tanks are played, which can not only help you to succeed with
those tanks but also to win against them if you don't know how
to deal with the armor of the object 279(e), I can only recommend
you guides like this one:
SlyMeerkat, on 23 October 2019 - 02:43 PM, said: Even more sad that you removed SirFoch comment because he was stating the truth, yet more typical BS from WG and their Snowflakes.... Dont worry though, hopefully it will bite back real hard one day because it sure is going that way.
thePhilX: Posts are not edited or removed because of having a different
opinion, it is - as always - about how you phrase it. So the
comment was not removed, because it included his personal opinion
about the state of reward tanks, but because of the language
used.
Lorensoth, on 23 October 2019 - 03:02 PM, said: I was sure ppl at WG have not been playing game past few year aswell. No wonder why some of their favorite tanks are like still Maus etc. Someone should remind them, at some point they did add things like Fv4201, 279e that made even tanks like 907 or 260 looked somewhat balanced. Oh btw, that "grand rebalance" thingies that they mentioned like, 4-5 year ago, still haven't happened either. So we still have "better ammo", absurdly high rng on every calculations and clickers combination that ruin any type of competitive play. Like some of reasons why they stopped competitive WoT years ago. Yep, they are still in game.
thePhilX: As on of the "ppl at WG" I can assure you that we do. I
unlocked the Obj260 and the Obj279(e) by completing the missions (I
didn't get any advantage or anything extra just for being in the
company) and I earned the Obj907 and T95/FV4201 Chieftain by
playing during the clanwars campaigns. Also I played during the
last Ranked Battles season and I can tell you, that it is possible
to compete in the higher ranks with the mentioned vehicles from the
article.
Ranked Battles: What's the Meta?