Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks
Дата: 23.01.2019 11:55:07
blockypanzer, on 22 January 2019 - 11:38 PM, said: Take a look and refresh your memory: 
Ville67
is lamenting the tiny size of the (still 200mm thick) cupola, which
coupled with the state of accuracy in WOT and reasonable combat
ranges makes these spots almost impossible to hit. Instead of
giving a reasonable reply, you mocked them. You may as well have
just told them to "git gud" when you know after 45K battles that
this is not their fault, least of all the fault of their eyesight.
You could use an actual aimbot to lock on to the cupolas, and under
normal circumstances 95% of your shots would miss them. I believe
Lemmingrush did a video demonstrating how with the Leopard 1 vs an
IS7 at 200m, less than 30% of perfectly aimed shots would actually
hit and pen the lower glacis. That's the most accurate gun, vs a
stationary target, and a much larger weaskpot than the 297e's
cupola. I'd say 95% misses sounds about right, so do you plan on
apologising to Ville? 23:39 Added after 1 minute
Agreed, we need a second official opinion here. I miss Ectar...
eekeeboo: Agreed, we need a second official opinion here. I miss
Ectar... I said I would consider, not you should
consider. Because taking it literally stating missing means you are
either sniping or your sensitivity is not right for the game,
because cupolas are not difficult to find and aim at.
And for "git gud". No, I said I would consider the fact if I aim at
something I will miss sometimes but do you seriously and I mean
this, seriously consider the implications. Are you saying missing a
target 95% of your shots are perfectly OK or that there's not a
fault with your gameplay? The video that was done, was
he aiming at a cupola (that barely exists, or was he aiming at a
large weakspot?) When you say hit and pen, how many hit? at what
range? There is a HUGE difference between hitting AND penning and
missing everything completely by a margin of 95%. Now to put that
into further perspective that's a comment on a tank that has no LFP
- it was a change to the floor of the tank, but instead of looking
at this you come here to make wild accusations and claims.
If you feel rules aren't being broken you can check them
here.
SpartA_1ah1, on 23 January 2019 - 01:30 AM, said: So when will the update drops? I want to test my 279e And thanks
again for the buffseekeeboo: Depending on how testing goes and the processes take place
it can affect the release timetable. As soon as we have a more
concrete date, we'll share it.
Lethul, on 23 January 2019 - 06:20 AM, said: My 430U took a lot of splash damage yesterday from a Type 5 that
shot under it. Can we buff 430U floor? It is underperforming.eekeeboo: If you can provide data from the whole player base, each
game, sample and maps across all regions and provide data
illustrating an increased instance of splash damage to their floor
of the tank outline the averages and intentions of other premiums.
Sure, we can pass this to the developers and balance department for
them to review in accordance to game balance and design
guidelines. Or are you trying to make a wildly
reductive strawman argument? In which case, carry on.
Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks