Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks
Дата: 22.01.2019 20:03:38
blockypanzer, on 21 January 2019 - 09:22 PM, said: You're assuming I didn't read the thread, and those relating
to it. Quite the opposite, I've read multiple threads in their
entirety on these topics, and discussed it on other sites with
community members. I stand by everything I said. You are not
addressing any of our concerns, only deflecting the questions. You
spoke about gun buffs, then tell me "we're discussing armour, not
the gun", yet when armour is mentioned, you claim we're supposed to
be talking about the gun. I never said you called players stupid,
however your attempts to deflect every criticism or question of
this incredibly dubious set of buffs IS insulting to your players.
-You have blatantly refused to show data, and joked at
people's intelligence because they weren't happy at your cryptic
responses. -You've directly insulted players with your
comments about getting a new mouse or some glasses regarding their
accuracy, when someone with as many battles as you knows 100% that
such a tiny cupola is not a viable weakspot to aim for with any gun
in the entire game, unless you're within touching distance of the
enemy, and they are not moving. -I said to exclude the
Christmas event because we both know that the controversy regarding
the IS3A's buffs, and the holiday loot boxes puleld in a
significant number of innactive players. However it's widely known
in the community (thanks to Quickybaby) that your player numbers
are in decline and have been for a while. Perhaps think about your
conduct on these forums, your internal decisions and how poorly
they're being recieved, and the number of players leaving the game.
I have not actually insulted you, nor used explatives. I
accused you of lying to the community, which was against forum
rules and I justly got my warning for it, but don't put words into
my mouth, please. So, instead of using half your replies to
nitpick the formatting and semantics of people's posts, and the
other half to belittle them, can you provide some data, some
evidence, anything to show us why this vehicle requires buffs?
Alternatively, can you contact anyone who was involved in the
balance changes, or just another staff member, and allow them to
speak to us about this topic? Conversation here has ceased to be
productive, because in the politest terms I can muster right now,
you're being highly obstructive. eekeeboo: No. I'm pointing out the way you talk is beyond rude and not
acceptable. Next, you talked to people, I wonder how many?
What percentage would that be in the view of the entire player
base? What sort of players? How many times did you have this talk?
Did you lead the conversation? If you read the thread, you'd
notice the complaints are at the lfp buff and how people feel
it will be invincible frontally, the fact you haven't noticed this,
illustrates you haven't in fact read the thread or the posts, you
can see for yourself the quote is referencing armour, not gun
buffs. I haven't joked, I haven't shown data, because
no gaming company shows this. I am surprised that you would expect
that data in this instance. Please illustrate and show when
I've insulted players where I have told someone to get a new mouse
or new glasses. You want to exclude a part of an event when
you say look at the event, please consider this logic. The player
numbers are in decline, there's never been hiding or denial of
this, in fact if you had read and understood as much as you say you
do. You would know for the various reasons for this and not just
twitch numbers and balancing. No insults? Please refer to the
following and then stop doing something you accuse others of: "It's
time to stop lying through your teeth" Next, you are
welcome to look up how communication and community management works
and you would have your next answer. I have been
polite and forthright despite the slander, slur and insult. Yet you
are incapable of sharing the same courtesy and until you do so I
will not extend the conversation past the parts where you're
incorrect.
Lethul, on 22 January 2019 - 08:59 AM, said: Haha, isnt it obvious that it is eekeeboo's role ? Wall of
text, ignore all form of critic, repeateekeeboo: Or you mean you'd prefer I ignore some peoples answers and
only type what you agree with?
Lethul, on 22 January 2019 - 09:15 AM, said: So @eekeeboo, in what way did Obj 279 underperform so heavily that
it needed to be buffed before IS-4/Kranvagn/Leo 1? Looking at all
stats available to us it seems to perform extremely well.
From all your data you are processing, which are the areas the IS-4
is performing vastly better than the Obj 279?eekeeboo: Once again, look at what was buffed, look at how it was
changed. For the balancing on things like the IS4,
please take the time to look at the WG fest announcement and take
note of the tanks to be buffed.
Krazy_Kalle, on 22 January 2019 - 11:54 AM, said: Okay you are right there, so no polls. Still: Pls don't
ignore my point with your CCs. They are there to represent your
community. And I think a really good player (which skill4ltu
definitively is) can estimate if a tank really needs
a buff or nerf. EDIT: Btw of course I
meant "staff", not stuff 
eekeeboo: The CC's are good at entertainment and creating content,
very rarely do they create content for balancing, game development
etc. That's why these people represent a small part of their
community and the community as a whole.
Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks