Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks

Дата: 21.01.2019 18:06:54
View Postnone666, on 18 January 2019 - 06:53 PM, said:   Yeah of course, improving gun stats and improving lowerplate. I dont mind gun buff, Id like to see every tanks gun buffed but thats just fantasy. I just dont get lower plate, if you can call it lowerplate, buff, its just removing any chance of penning it for lower tiers and leaving as it is, is not making tank weak

eekeeboo:   If you notice the particular part of the armour that was buffed, it's not about being penetrated frontally but the damage received from things like splash damage.   

View PostShalashaska_666, on 18 January 2019 - 11:18 PM, said:   Dont question the Developers they may not have a clue what is right to buff and what not, but hey lets buff armour   *edited*  

eekeeboo:   Please read and consider what is being changed, thank-you.   

View Postsady3296, on 18 January 2019 - 08:48 PM, said:   Ive already formed my opinion... its a money grab. Better reward, more people want it, play the game, get more tanks, premium to complete mission etc etc. They dont care about the data ... and the lack of it.   And you avoiding the question with even more questions, sarcasm and [edited]hints really made me sure im right.  

eekeeboo:   Precisely my point, you have no intention of a discussion or open to anything other than your already formed biased and uninformed opinion. I'm happy to discuss and answer a question if a person is going to actually read it, acknowledge it and then consider it, not just dismiss it by not reading because it doesn't fit their own opinion. For that I have no patience or time to be drawn into a petty argument when there are people who are going to want to discuss and have an adult conversation on this.   

View Postblockypanzer, on 20 January 2019 - 08:01 AM, said: Yes, don't insult our intelligence please.  We're not having a problem understanding that you are buffing its resistance to HE because it takes a lot of its damage from that ammo type. We're not having touble understanding that you're buffing the gun handling because it's a bit derpy.   What we're having huge trouble understanding is why you think its acceptable to be buffing the Ob279e in these areas, such as to remove some of the vehicles ONLY weaknesses on the battlefield. A balanced tank should have a mixture of strengths and weaknesses. If it has no major weaknesses, it follows it should have few major strengths. The Ob279e has huge strengths in multiple areas, mostly concentrated in its incredibly strong frontal and turret armour, lack of any frontal weakspots, and punchy high DPM gun. It follows that a tank like this (one which is already performing exceptionally well) should not need, or even be allowed, to have things like solid gun handling, accuracy, and resistance to arty/HE. These weaknesses are what was keeping this vehicle from being totally invincible on the battlefield. Judging from the tank's winrate, these weaknesses aren't enough to offset its huge strengths either, and you plan on REMOVING some of them?    And do NOT say that winrate isn't reflective of whether the tank is OP. I'm well aware only experienced players own this tank, but you know which other vehicle is only played by strong players? The Object 907, which is sitting a whole 8% lower on winrate at 57%. Typically, if a tank was 8% lower in winrate than other tanks of its tier, it would be considered totally underpowered. Not the 907, it's the 2nd highest winrate of all tier X vehicles, and is widely considered to be overpowered, or it was until the 279e reared its ugly head. The 907 may be played by the best, but it undeniably has better overall stats than the Object 140 for the current meta and map design, and the 140 is almost undeniably the best medium on the regular tech trees. It's fair to say, putting it mildly, that the Object 907 is an incredibly strong vehicle, yet the Object 279e's 8% better winrate just makes it look insignificant.    It's time to stop lying through your teeth about "data" telling you these buffs were needed. Your playerbase is not as dumb as you'd like to believe, and it seems we care more about the future of this game than its own creators at this point. Everyone can see there is no grounds for improving easilly the strongest tank the game has ever seen, and your attempts to deflect the community outrage are coming across as thinly veiled contempt for us all. (your comments about getting a new mouse or visiting the opticians if you keep missing the tiny cupola on the vehicle? That was pure contempt for player concerns, and dismissing the reality of the situation.)   I don't even know why we're bothering to fight you on this though. We are only going to see another Object 268v4 situation (funny how all the OP tanks are Russian Objects, eh?) whereby you talk about buffing it, you deny it's OP, and eventually nerf it quietly after enough people have reached it and your profits have been made.    Final note: if you love data so much, maybe look at the player numbers prior to the holiday event cashgrabbing. They might put some of your recent decisions into perspective.

eekeeboo:   You speak about intelligence, insults and lying. Yet you've breached 2 out of 3 of those. For your information, I STRONGLY suggest you actually read what's being said, what's being objected against in the thread before you wade into the middle. You'll note how many complaints at the gun and those of the armour. If a person I'm replying to has complained at the armour increase, then you can guess the topic I'm referring to. Just actually read and take note of what you quote and tell me how you inferred gun damage discussion from something clearly discussing the armour.    I've never called the playerbase "Stupid" but you're further highlighting an issue with some of the playerbase (in this instance, you) who simply DO NOT read, DO NOT take the time to think about what's being said, only count the words until they can respond to type their opinion with more insults, expletives and given the option with more assertation everyone else is wrong if it doesn't fit their opinion.    This is further highlighted with player numbers, I'm interested in how you get this when the player numbers were high over Christmas, was it because it's the holidays and people have more time to play. Is it just player numbers that determine the success of an event or is too the amount of players who played frequently and purchased something in-game?  16:07 Added after 0 minutes

View PostOtherPlans, on 20 January 2019 - 11:01 AM, said: Yeah, buff 279(e), it's not like you have more important things: Tiger II, chinese meds, nerfing OP Type 4/5 HE prem ammo, 430u or removing arty.   https://youtu.be/Z35RjbsQ2Pk

eekeeboo:   All things highlighted coming in 2019 part of other changes, thank-you for considering this in your post. 

Реклама | Adv