Improvements to Personal Missions And Reward Tanks
Дата: 21.01.2019 14:48:34
blockypanzer, on 20 January 2019 - 07:06 AM, said: Please don't lie to your community. We all know there was no
data that said the 279e needed buffing. And please tell us what
matters in the game more than a tank's winrate and damage ratios
when looking at whether it's OP. Last I checked, if a tank is
dealing huge ammounts of damage, taking minmal ammounts in return,
and winning a 15v15 game at a rate much higher than its fellow
vehicles, that would indicate it's broken OP and needs looking at
for nerfs. Perhaps you'd like to convice us that a tank with a 65%
winrate is balanced because it gets tracked a lot? Or because its
spotting ratio is low? Doesn't seem these things are doing much to
subvert the winrate does it?eekeeboo: Accusing me of lying isn't going to help nor change the
facts. For instance, you haven't once considered that perhaps
the floor of the tank was leading too much damage being caused via
splash damage, or that there was an above average number of
critically damaged modules from splashed damage resulting from
explosions originating below the tank. There is a difference
between being informed and sharing that information and lying.
Insulting me is not going to help and definitely not change
anything. Only your ability and willingness to be open and think
about the reason for changes and how these changes were done will
help you in this. I don't need to try to convince you on the
winrate because any person who's thinking about this and not just
waiting for the opportunity to complain will have considered what
players will have already unlocked this tank their ability and
their ability to win in battles combined with how likely these
people are to play in platoons that can also vastly influence
win-rate. Once more, balancing a tank is done on more than
just winrate and the damage the tank does. 12:50 Added
after 2 minutes
Gremlin182, on 21 January 2019 - 11:08 AM, said: 279 buff ok I am looking at this in tanks GG and as others have
said there is no lower plate as such, The hull front is mostly 280
+ turret Even higher easily 350 + Weak spots well an extremely
difficult to hit cupola that's around 212 but hey its a tier 10 so
I expect good armour. Never driven one and don't remember meeting
one so how hard it is to kill I don't know. Is it sensible to buff
it NO actually imo its a pretty bad idea to buff or nerf any tank
right now and its pretty silly to make any changes to premium ammo
too. Balancing tanks and for that matter ammo is presumably
based on how they perform against the tanks they meet and how well
or badly they do. So Qestion how can you decide anything
until you give us back +2 -2 MM, right now all we have is +2 -0 and
occasionally -1 My tier 10 games are either against tier 9 or 10
tanks usually tier 10 Tier 8s I might see as I say one game in 20.
Tier 9s same thing only its mostly all tier 9 or five tier 10s and
ten tier 9s very rarely a tier 8 and never a tier 7 You
really have to work on that MM there is literally little point in
balancing tanks making decisions on premium ammo arty or anything
else other than maps cosmetic changes improvements to the game
engine etc. All the other changes will have to be redone when you
give us a working MM I still haven't got my head around this
3 5 7 template of yours as yet My tier 8 tanks often meet tier 9
and 10s but my tier 10s seldom if ever meet tier 8 tanks. I know
its not a conspiracy but that's how it appears eekeeboo: Some of these points might be better in the general feedback
topic. It's good feedback but please bear in mind that this is also
a patch with no MM changes, so the points are a little redundant in
these topics.
Improvements to Personal Missions And Reward Tanks