Matchmaking Discussion Thread
Дата: 11.01.2019 20:29:05
m1x_angelico, on 11 January 2019 - 06:23 PM, said: Dont really understand, who's definition am I supposed to use in my analysis? You got the replays, so download them and do your analysis as you see fit, with the definitions you see fit. Dont want to download them? Then dont. I really cant be expected to deal with your paranoia issues. I'm continuing the discussion with data (although small sample size atm), while you are continuing with the same baseless nonsense... I understand the need for it. Still over-moderation is the other side of the coin as under-moderation. If I write on the forum the same data that is publicly and freely available to everyone, how is this naming and shaming, while public display of this same data by WG itself is not? That's what I mean when I say moderation here is sometimes weird. But, it's not a biggy.
eekeeboo: Because that data isn't available anywhere, not to mention data that's inaccurate like people who started witch hunts like "This player is a bot" - because that player stole their kill and thus you with hunt a ban. That behaviour and attitude has no place in this game. I'm all for no naming and shaming, because as much as it's an inconvenience sometimes. It's better to not end up with an innocent person unjustly harassed and abused because someone decided they want to make life difficult for someone.