Matchmaking Discussion Thread
Дата: 11.01.2019 20:29:05
m1x_angelico, on 11 January 2019 - 06:23 PM, said: Dont really understand, who's definition am I supposed to
use in my analysis? You got the replays, so download them and
do your analysis as you see fit, with the definitions you see fit.
Dont want to download them? Then dont. I really cant be
expected to deal with your paranoia issues. I'm continuing
the discussion with data (although small sample size atm), while
you are continuing with the same baseless nonsense...
I understand the need for it. Still over-moderation is the other
side of the coin as under-moderation. If I write on the forum the
same data that is publicly and freely available to everyone, how is
this naming and shaming, while public display of this same data by
WG itself is not? That's what I mean when I say moderation here is
sometimes weird. But, it's not a biggy.eekeeboo: Because that data isn't available anywhere, not to mention
data that's inaccurate like people who started witch hunts like
"This player is a bot" - because that player stole their kill and
thus you with hunt a ban. That behaviour and attitude has
no place in this game. I'm all for no naming and shaming,
because as much as it's an inconvenience sometimes. It's
better to not end up with an innocent person unjustly harassed and
abused because someone decided they want to make life difficult for
someone.
Matchmaking Discussion Thread