Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

EU Questions & Answers

Дата: 02.02.2012 09:15:00
 JagdWehrwolf, on 01 February 2012 - 08:27 PM, said: Overlord.
My question about Kwk 36/L56 remains unanswered, so not to break the rules I'll rephrase my question.
Taking a look at proposed complete tech trees and doing some research gave me this summary.
Tank Destroyers - Tier 6
Soviet Union - SU-100 - Armament ranges: Penetration 120 - 175, Damage 160 - 390, within four guns;
France - ARL V 39 - Armament: APX 75mm; Penetration data is scarce, but I think it's safe to assume it at around 100, while I'm not going to try to guess the Damage;
U.S.A - M36 Slugger - Armament ranges: Penetration 128 - 160, Damage 115 - 240, within two guns;
- M18 Hellcat - Armament: M1A1 76,2mm; Statistics well known;
Germany - Nashorn - Armament: Pak 43 88/L71; Stats well known;
- JagdPanzer IV - Armament ranges (excluding howitzer): Penetration 106 - 138, Damage 110 - 220, within three guns;
In case of French TD and Hellcat, again I'm assuming that historically mounted guns are gonna be stock.
And now my question(s) is/are: how after completing the tech trees developers are going to keep JagdPanzer IV competitive against other vehicles of its Tier? Could You explain what is intended purpose of Jagdpanzer in current WoT environment or, in other words, what does "works as intended" means? What are Your own experiences with that vehicle and base on them do You really think there is nothing wrong with it?
Regards.

Overlord: Dont remember using "works as intended" phrase as often as some say.
While JpIV can be considered as underdog among other tier 6 TDs, statistical gap is not that huge to pay much attention to it. There are other tier and class combinations with a more significant imbalance to be taken care of.

Реклама | Adv