Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

EU Questions & Answers

Дата: 15.11.2011 16:28:07
View PostTerminator93, on 14 November 2011 - 05:08 PM, said: I think angling is one of the most important things with german tanks of higher tiers, especially Tiger II, E-50, E-75, E-100. These guys should be really tough tanks from the front, but weaker on the sides. Through angling they should get nearly impenetrateable onto the front armour, or? No need to discuss that All of these guys should be penetrated by tanks of the same tiers if they stand in a 90° angle to them. But if angled to lets say about 45° i think no one of them should be penetrated by heavy tanks the same tier through the front (without prem. ammo). The problem is, without exposing your side, the E-100 could angle max. 20° while driving around a corner. E-75 could manage 30° that menas impact angles for the enemy rounds of 80 or 60 degrees. But 150 or 130mm of lower front armour are not close to be enough to stop rounds at this angle. Even at 45° its randomly if the S70 penetrates or not. I would say, test out how far the front armor of both must be increased so that they cant be penetrated by tanks 2 tiers under them frontally anymore at a 90° angle (That means, E-75 not by 88L71, E-100 not by 10,5cm L68). I tested out, E-100 is still penetrated on lower hull at 45° from guns with 225 penetration, thats not okey!
My question:
- Would be the lower hull armour of both increased, so that they cant be penetrated anymore by the guns of 2 tiers lower? (E-75 not by 88L71, E-100 not by 10,5cmL68)?

Overlord: Not planning to change armor values.

Реклама | Adv