Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

EU Questions & Answers

Дата: 14.10.2011 13:01:54
View PostkaBiem, on 13 October 2011 - 09:22 PM, said: Dear WoT-Team,
i got a question about shell costs. Here some ingame data:
US: mm/avg. damage | shell costs --------------------------- 90/240 (AP) | 255 105/320 (AP) | 1000 120/400 (AP) | 1060 155/750 (AP) | 1650 T9/T10 203/1450(AP) | 1092 SPG
USSR: mm/avg. damage |shell costs --------------------------- 100/230 (AP)| 252 107/300 (AP)| 270 152/700 (AP)| 725 SU/... 122/390 (AP)| 1025 203/1450(AP)| 1092 SPG
I really love driving the IS with 122mm-cannon, but in average i get lesser credits after a round than with the german counterparts (Tiger (P), .../ 88mm, avg. damage 220, shell cost 252 credits) due to the higher costs per damage done. (But the damage per shot is higher)
This is just an example for other differences between cost per damage done, but i think especially in Tier 7 theres some unfairness.
So, do you consider to lower the shell costs for Tier 7 vehicles with a larger caliber (105mm, 122mm) to accomplish a better balance between cost per damage in Tier7? And if so, could it be a solution to not change the current shell costs of Tier8/9 (105mm, 122mm), while changing the shell costs of Tier7, altough they have the same caliber due to the lesser credit gain in higher Tiers?
Greetings and live long and prosper

Overlord: Reconsideration is possible. As for 122mm costs for IS, it's intentional.

Реклама | Adv