Statement about the SirFoch incident
Дата: 23.05.2017 21:51:31
THE_MOON, on 23 May 2017 - 05:51 PM, said: So does that mean you're going to make it harder to become
CC, and current CCs will have to sign an agreement with you with
whatever you deem necessary and any breech such as disagreeing with
current monetary policy will result in contract termination and
possible lawsuit for defamation / slander? So you're
leaving the door open to strike SirFoch with these claims and you
will try to find something in his past streams/videos from when he
still was CC to back it up? Very clever.
HerrWilhelm, on 23 May 2017 - 06:26 PM, said: Since WG NA is making a different statement, WG should make a global statement where all regions should stick to, so wherever you are in the world you know how WG will respond to any content.
MrConway: We have said it before and will say it again: We have never
tried to silence the criticism of any of our contributors on
YouTube or otherwise and we will not try to do so in future either.
This entire unfortunate episode was never about the content of
SirFoch's video, only the way it was presented. In no way do
we want to "go after" SirFoch.
HerrWilhelm, on 23 May 2017 - 06:26 PM, said: Since WG NA is making a different statement, WG should make a global statement where all regions should stick to, so wherever you are in the world you know how WG will respond to any content.
MrConway: WG NA has posted the same statement on their portal.
Statement about the SirFoch incident