Statement about the SirFoch incident
Дата: 23.05.2017 21:40:36
JimmieTheSaint, on 23 May 2017 - 05:27 PM, said: -Aye I see your statement, it's to little, to late.
[edited] Bring back Jingles, Pointy haired, and
SirFoch.! CC's do not work for you, if anything they work for
the Community. You do help them a lot because you want happy
players and you want to sell stuff, but they do not work for you
and none of your people should think they do or expect them
to behave because they get early access and all that.
Oh and yeah in generel better communication not just between WG and
players, WG and CC's, but an important thing is WG to WG as we saw
here where WG NA suddenly entered the fray. (oh and dont we
miss a GM Asia signing that statement for it to be all off WG's
offices agreeing?? Would be hilarious if WG Asia went out tonight
and "made an American" /s) And while you're at it, fix
your game for [edited] sake. I am still on the
fence about you WG, this was a first step from you it keeps me on
the fence right now. I will follow up and see how you do these next
couple of day's and if you think it's all goooood now. I will
be jumping off the fence and go try to convince my clan to see if
we can find another game to call home. (and as it stands right now
that would be to easy, wich is sad for I like your games. )
*Sharpening pitchforks, and stacking torches.
Jethro_Grey, on 23 May 2017 - 05:39 PM, said: Thank you for clarifying the official policy, takes some ball$ to admit to mistakes made. One thing that would interest me way more than the - what a lot of people consider to be - p2w situation with premium tanks is: What's gonna happen with Jingles? PointyHairedJedi? Unlike SirFoch who crossed the line, they stepped down due to a comment made by a WG NA employee, who for all intents and purposes had no business in this whole affair. Will WG ask them - or invite them back into the CC program? After all, they stepped down based on information they had at that time, which turned out to be wrong. Will WG consider giving SirFoch a second chance...after grass has grown over this rather pointless drama? I'm not a fan of him, yet i think it would be beneficial if both sides would have a kind of "shake hands" - preferably without comments from WG NA (^^) to put the matter where it belongs: in a dusty locker bin.
MrConway: The statement is official Wargaming policy and was
sanctioned by our CEO, so it applies to all offices. I also
think it is sad that some of you are so willing to sharpen
pitchforks and personally attack someone who cares greatly for this
community and the game.
Jethro_Grey, on 23 May 2017 - 05:39 PM, said: Thank you for clarifying the official policy, takes some ball$ to admit to mistakes made. One thing that would interest me way more than the - what a lot of people consider to be - p2w situation with premium tanks is: What's gonna happen with Jingles? PointyHairedJedi? Unlike SirFoch who crossed the line, they stepped down due to a comment made by a WG NA employee, who for all intents and purposes had no business in this whole affair. Will WG ask them - or invite them back into the CC program? After all, they stepped down based on information they had at that time, which turned out to be wrong. Will WG consider giving SirFoch a second chance...after grass has grown over this rather pointless drama? I'm not a fan of him, yet i think it would be beneficial if both sides would have a kind of "shake hands" - preferably without comments from WG NA (^^) to put the matter where it belongs: in a dusty locker bin.
MrConway: Jingles and PointyHairedJedi both voluntarily resigned from
the contributor program which we are obviously not happy about.
Hopefully we will be able to rebuild our relationship and
welcome them back to the program sooner rather than later.
Statement about the SirFoch incident