Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
merig00
[FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
arrow
13.07.2010 03:12:55
 
Subject: [FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
Link on message: #24316

View PostLilisam, on Jul 13 2010 - 01:06, said: Got the same thing for money ?


merig00: what?


merig00
[FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
arrow
13.07.2010 03:12:55
 
Subject: [FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
Link on message: #24316

View PostLilisam, on Jul 13 2010 - 01:06, said: Got the same thing for money ?


merig00: what?


merig00
Gold Per Day
arrow
13.07.2010 02:43:42
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #24297

View PostDoomlord52, on Jul 13 2010 - 00:41, said: ^ That gets you free XP (and gold)? But also, that means unlocking EVERYTHING, which in the case on the PIV, would mean unlocking over 60k XP worth of stuff that I dont want - which is more than I need to transfer. IMO the system should be looked at.


merig00: Yeah the tanks where you can "branch out" should be looked at. Otherwise I don't see much problem with the current system. The whole idea of the paying money is to speed up your advancement through the tree. I think that's the most fair way to set up F2P game.


merig00
Gold Per Day
arrow
13.07.2010 02:43:42
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #24297

View PostDoomlord52, on Jul 13 2010 - 00:41, said: ^ That gets you free XP (and gold)? But also, that means unlocking EVERYTHING, which in the case on the PIV, would mean unlocking over 60k XP worth of stuff that I dont want - which is more than I need to transfer. IMO the system should be looked at.


merig00: Yeah the tanks where you can "branch out" should be looked at. Otherwise I don't see much problem with the current system. The whole idea of the paying money is to speed up your advancement through the tree. I think that's the most fair way to set up F2P game.


merig00
Gold Per Day
arrow
13.07.2010 01:09:33
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #24214

View PostDoomlord52, on Jul 12 2010 - 23:07, said: if we dont get gold in the release, you guys HAVE to make it so you can transfer XP for either: free, or credits.

I have 34k XP on my PIV, and the only way to transfer it is via gold. Without gold, other users are at a massive leveling disadvantage.


merig00: rapid train your crew :)


merig00
Gold Per Day
arrow
13.07.2010 01:09:33
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #24214

View PostDoomlord52, on Jul 12 2010 - 23:07, said: if we dont get gold in the release, you guys HAVE to make it so you can transfer XP for either: free, or credits.

I have 34k XP on my PIV, and the only way to transfer it is via gold. Without gold, other users are at a massive leveling disadvantage.


merig00: rapid train your crew :)


MrVic
Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 23:24:58
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
Link on message: #24126

View PostAerensiniac, on 12 July 2010 - 10:17 PM, said: I want to see you engaging a heavy tank with a light one.
Seriously. I watched such a fight while loling my ass off, the light tank circled around the heavy for like 3 minutes shooting it everywhere possible while the heavy was trying to turn its barrell towards it.
The light tank got so desperate it actually started RAMMING the heavy tank.
It made my day, srsly.

MrVic: I have had 3 Panzer IIIA take out my KV-2. It was rather well played by them. Not so much by me :)


MrVic
kickass idea
arrow
12.07.2010 23:11:44
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\kickass idea
Link on message: #24104

MrVic: I was thinking submarine warfare in Lakeville :)


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 23:01:08
 
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\Vehicle Comparison\Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #24090

View PostWyvernrider, on 12 July 2010 - 08:09 PM, said: I am curious as I haven't played through a change in the game yet. When an update is release, are the notes of the changes also released? Seeing such tweaks will help in knowing what to expect.

MrVic: Yeah, There should be patch notes for patches typically containing anything that really is of importance to us as players. Sometimes it takes a couple days to get out but you should see them. In the past we have seen them :)


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 23:01:08
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #24090

View PostWyvernrider, on Jul 12 2010 - 19:09, said: I am curious as I haven't played through a change in the game yet. When an update is release, are the notes of the changes also released? Seeing such tweaks will help in knowing what to expect.


MrVic:
Yeah, There should be patch notes for patches typically containing anything that really is of importance to us as players.  Sometimes it takes a couple days to get out but you should see them. In the past we have seen them :)


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 23:01:08
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #24090

View PostWyvernrider, on Jul 12 2010 - 19:09, said: I am curious as I haven't played through a change in the game yet. When an update is release, are the notes of the changes also released? Seeing such tweaks will help in knowing what to expect.


MrVic:
Yeah, There should be patch notes for patches typically containing anything that really is of importance to us as players.  Sometimes it takes a couple days to get out but you should see them. In the past we have seen them :)


MrVic
not alot of exp n credits from scouting
arrow
12.07.2010 21:18:45
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\not alot of exp n credits from scouting
Link on message: #23966

View PostMrFunnyBoots, on 11 July 2010 - 10:13 PM, said: It is not enough to just spot them. You get much more credits if one of your team mates inflicts any damage/destroys the enemy you've spotted. The stronger that spotted/destroyed/damaged enemy is, the more credits and exp. you get. In BT-7 you can get up to 10K credits and 900 exp per battle; in A-20 - up to 35K credits and 3K exp.

MrVic: I do believe MrFunnyBoots hit the nail on the head :) From what I understand spotting is nice but the bulk of the exp comes from your spotting helping your team score hits.
In essence running up and going "I see you" 13 times and dying doesn't give ya to much. Waiting for a good tactical time to scout them with your team setup and prepared for the "spotting" would probably yield much more exp.
In the end it makes sense why scout if no one can act on it :) The fast snap shot of where they are before you die is some help but not much, hence probably less exp for it :)


merig00
[FAQ] Equipment
arrow
12.07.2010 21:08:19
 
Subject: [FAQ] Equipment
Link on message: #23947

View PostLilisam, on Jul 12 2010 - 17:53, said: So if i understand well you can use same equipment on multiple tanks ?

merig00: Several of them are limited to level or nation but overall yes - you can buy one and just move them to other tanks.


merig00
[FAQ] Equipment
arrow
12.07.2010 21:08:19
 
Subject: [FAQ] Equipment
Link on message: #23947

View PostLilisam, on Jul 12 2010 - 17:53, said: So if i understand well you can use same equipment on multiple tanks ?

merig00: Several of them are limited to level or nation but overall yes - you can buy one and just move them to other tanks.


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 21:05:49
 
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\Vehicle Comparison\Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23943

View PostWyvernrider, on 12 July 2010 - 07:51 PM, said: Thank you. This helps. It would be nice for the release to have these values in game to help with the understanding. :Smile_great:

MrVic: Overviews and guides such as the Tankopedia will help with such matters. Some things are easier noticed from the perspective of other tank classes also.
The game is rapidly changing and the Devs adjust things on frequent intervals which is amazing and shows their efforts. The only downside is things evolve faster
then information can be gathered sometimes :) These things make betas great fun. Mush like the old submarine tanks we had for a bit :Smile_harp:


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 21:05:49
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23943

View PostWyvernrider, on Jul 12 2010 - 18:51, said: Thank you. This helps. It would be nice for the release to have these values in game to help with the understanding.  :Smile_great:


MrVic:
Overviews and guides such as the Tankopedia will help with such matters.  Some things are easier noticed from the perspective of other tank classes also.
The game is rapidly changing and the Devs adjust things on frequent intervals which is amazing and shows their efforts. The only downside is things evolve faster
then information can be gathered sometimes :)    These things make betas great fun.     Mush like the old submarine tanks we had for a bit  :Smile_harp:


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 21:05:49
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23943

View PostWyvernrider, on Jul 12 2010 - 18:51, said: Thank you. This helps. It would be nice for the release to have these values in game to help with the understanding.  :Smile_great:


MrVic:
Overviews and guides such as the Tankopedia will help with such matters.  Some things are easier noticed from the perspective of other tank classes also.
The game is rapidly changing and the Devs adjust things on frequent intervals which is amazing and shows their efforts. The only downside is things evolve faster
then information can be gathered sometimes :)    These things make betas great fun.     Mush like the old submarine tanks we had for a bit  :Smile_harp:


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 19:44:58
 
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\Vehicle Comparison\Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23833

View PostRyu84, on 12 July 2010 - 05:35 PM, said: someone of you have played SU-76??
I'd like a feedback from you,because for my opinion it is a very bad tank
low accuracy,low armor(most of the tanks,no spg,shoot and kill me with 1 shot -.- ,, i am talking about German TD),low damage(i don't kill noone with 1 shot)
so, where am i going to wrong?! It's strange because with the previous tank,the AT-1 i killed more than SU-76

MrVic: Whats your crew exp at? That has a great effect. Also you moved into the open tiers currently with the SU-76 so starting out it may take some getting used to what tanks are weaker where ect. Much like my recent use of the KV-2. I took me a good while to really get things sorted out for each tank.


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 19:44:58
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23833

View PostRyu84, on Jul 12 2010 - 16:35, said: someone of you have played SU-76??

I'd like a feedback from you,because for my opinion it is a very bad tank

low accuracy,low armor(most of the tanks,no spg,shoot and kill me with 1 shot -.- ,, i am talking about German TD),low damage(i don't kill noone with 1 shot)

so, where am i going to wrong?! It's strange because with the previous tank,the AT-1 i killed more than SU-76


MrVic:
Whats your crew exp at? That has a great effect.  Also you moved into the open tiers currently with the SU-76 so starting out it may take some getting used to what tanks are weaker where ect.  Much like my recent use of the KV-2. I took me a good while to really get things sorted out for each tank.


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 19:44:58
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23833

View PostRyu84, on Jul 12 2010 - 16:35, said: someone of you have played SU-76??

I'd like a feedback from you,because for my opinion it is a very bad tank

low accuracy,low armor(most of the tanks,no spg,shoot and kill me with 1 shot -.- ,, i am talking about German TD),low damage(i don't kill noone with 1 shot)

so, where am i going to wrong?! It's strange because with the previous tank,the AT-1 i killed more than SU-76


MrVic:
Whats your crew exp at? That has a great effect.  Also you moved into the open tiers currently with the SU-76 so starting out it may take some getting used to what tanks are weaker where ect.  Much like my recent use of the KV-2. I took me a good while to really get things sorted out for each tank.


MrVic
Gold Per Day
arrow
12.07.2010 19:20:02
 
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Gold Per Day
Link on message: #23794

View PostTrebs, on 12 July 2010 - 04:15 PM, said: Not in the battle.(But you do get your tank 50% Faster than others)
But whit gold you dont have to worry about buying new tank's ammo extra stuff like those things that cost 500,000 And Premium ammo. And repair. So whit this you do get a advantage.

MrVic: But under the same idea if I have no job and play 24 hours a day, I will make probably 60% more exp and credits then the average player in the course of a day. So I have an advantage? Yes of sorts, but its all based on the perspective that you want to look at it. In the long term there is no advantage. I think for players that feel they need to have the biggest tank to win the battle, they will probably invest heavily to maintain the bigger tanks. Others will take what they have and carry the day more so with skill then a out leveling another tank.
Also if I have this right from my experiences. The higher the tier tank you damage the more cash you get for damaging it. The inverse is also true. So if your in a IS-7 killing tons of MS-1's your going to lose money. If you fight people of equal level your profits greatly increase.


MrVic
Gold Per Day
arrow
12.07.2010 19:20:02
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #23794

View PostTrebs, on Jul 12 2010 - 15:15, said: Not in the battle.(But you do get your tank 50% Faster than others)

But whit gold you dont have to worry about buying new tank's ammo extra stuff like those things that cost 500,000 And Premium ammo. And repair. So whit this you do get a advantage.


MrVic:
But under the same idea if I have no job and play 24 hours a day, I will make probably 60% more exp and credits then the average player in the course of a day. So I have an advantage? Yes of sorts, but its all based on the perspective that you want to look at it. In the long term there is no advantage.  I think for players that feel they need to have the biggest tank to win the battle, they will probably invest heavily to maintain the bigger tanks.  Others will take what they have and carry the day more so with skill then a out leveling another tank.

Also if I have this right from my experiences. The higher the tier tank you damage the more cash you get for damaging it.  The inverse is also true. So if your in a IS-7 killing tons of MS-1's your going to lose money.  If you fight people of equal level your profits greatly increase.


MrVic
Gold Per Day
arrow
12.07.2010 19:20:02
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #23794

View PostTrebs, on Jul 12 2010 - 15:15, said: Not in the battle.(But you do get your tank 50% Faster than others)

But whit gold you dont have to worry about buying new tank's ammo extra stuff like those things that cost 500,000 And Premium ammo. And repair. So whit this you do get a advantage.


MrVic:
But under the same idea if I have no job and play 24 hours a day, I will make probably 60% more exp and credits then the average player in the course of a day. So I have an advantage? Yes of sorts, but its all based on the perspective that you want to look at it. In the long term there is no advantage.  I think for players that feel they need to have the biggest tank to win the battle, they will probably invest heavily to maintain the bigger tanks.  Others will take what they have and carry the day more so with skill then a out leveling another tank.

Also if I have this right from my experiences. The higher the tier tank you damage the more cash you get for damaging it.  The inverse is also true. So if your in a IS-7 killing tons of MS-1's your going to lose money.  If you fight people of equal level your profits greatly increase.


MrVic
Can I use the same equiptment for every tank?
arrow
12.07.2010 18:13:48
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Can I use the same equiptment for every tank?
Link on message: #23701

View PostGraveDigger, on 12 July 2010 - 05:01 PM, said: E.G. When I buy camouflage nets or a tool box. Is it bound to this tank or can i freely use this?

MrVic: If I remember correctly its not bound to your tank but a module you can move to another tank.
I think as long as you remove it prior to selling you can apply it to another tank.
I could be wrong I have not purchased one yet as I am not that the rich right now :)


merig00
[FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
arrow
12.07.2010 18:13:02
 
Subject: [FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
Link on message: #23698

View PostImmanio, on Jul 12 2010 - 11:20, said: From what I've gathered, warrior is 5+ kills. Scout I suspect might be more than 10 detects? Sharpshooter is obviously high accuracy. No idea exactly how steel wall works, though, beyond getting shot at.


merig00: I'm about to post a FAQ here on that


merig00
[FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
arrow
12.07.2010 18:13:02
 
Subject: [FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
Link on message: #23698

View PostImmanio, on Jul 12 2010 - 11:20, said: From what I've gathered, warrior is 5+ kills. Scout I suspect might be more than 10 detects? Sharpshooter is obviously high accuracy. No idea exactly how steel wall works, though, beyond getting shot at.


merig00: I'm about to post a FAQ here on that


MrVic
Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 18:03:08
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
Link on message: #23687

View PostMrFunnyBoots, on 12 July 2010 - 04:51 PM, said: MrVic, it may sound nice, but think about the consequences. If what you have suggested will be implemented then artillery will be able to shoot anything only if it's lucky or the target is immobile for a LONG time under SPGs fire (which is nonesence). Almost no skill is involved. Either luck or stupidity of the target. Personally, I think that it is a really bad idea.

MrVic: I do not have any information or will be given any about changes coming (I am not a Dev) This is just ideas I have kicked around and maybe others can improve them :)
You have to remember the picture is not to scale :) This is a basic idea to start from also. that is just a basic representation of it. Depending on the ranging area sizes a player may be able to move out of the area rather fast thus requiring some skill to predict their pattern. Also the final size circle would probably not be that small creating auto hits. Combined with the fact that the target may disappear from sight during this process due to spotters and such and thus losing the target.
As to skill with the current SPGs, There is no more skill there then with this system. Their the same level pretty much.
Once you level your crew up for accuracy increase/aiming speed increase, and you learn the base distance to lead light/mediums/heavies its pretty much auto hits with a tiny bit of practice :)


MrVic
Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 17:55:22
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
Link on message: #23677

MrVic: Another Idea I have had as of recently was a shotgun effect.
This involves lower overall accuracy to a larger "circle" area.
But when a SPG fires it fires 3 successive shots into that area, one after another (rather fast)
So essentially you are not laser precision but you have a good chance of striking a target in that area or damaging him. With all rounds landing in random locations within the area of aiming direct hits are likely but not nearly as perfectly percise.
Also in direct fire mode you would only still fire a single round. (I also think direct fire mode should not be able to use auto aim or lower its accuracy more)
Basics:
1) Enlarge the circular area of targeting at max aim (aka bigger area)
2) Fire 3 successive shots into that area per trigger pull
3) Decrease ammo costs down to 1/3 of their normal costs to create the same cost to SPG's (Or leave it the same but it fires 3 shots for 1
4) Maybe increase ammo capacity to help if needed for ammo.
Perks More area effect attacks with less accuracy (better represents a barrage this way)
More area effect adds the chance to break up formations of enemies moving into the attack. Or blind fire counter artillery your enemies artillery.
It would look really cool 8D
Greater chance to hit more tanks and cause more carnage.
Last but not least we return artillery to 1943 tech :) (aka no smart bombs) hehe
Just some more ideas :)


MrVic
Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 17:42:28
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Official SPG (Artillery) Discussion
Link on message: #23665

MrVic: Figured I would move a idea I had once about arty over to this forum to let folks see it and maybe they will come up with more ideas from it :)
Posted Image
The basics of this.
1) SPG's get to fire more rounds and thus adding more fun time active instead of reloading as a spectator.
2) SPG's Fall into a more realistic way of fighting. More of a bombardment then a Laser guided bomb.
3) SPG's Can get lucky and hit the target with the first shell or any after that. As you fire more shells your accuracy improves simulating your gun ranging in as was the norm until the modern day.
4) SPG's Rate of fire increased. This allows them to fire more and range in faster on their target while its still in the area/visable. This is a must due to speed increase across the board to all tanks for game fun reasons.
5) SPG's Need to carry more ammo so support firing more rounds per match. 1 SPG is in essence acting as a real WW2 small battery of artillery would.
6) SPG's Targets would actually be threatened from the first shot even killed. but more so this would force them to make a choice. Stay and fight it out (staying more accurate) or make a break for it. (exposing themselves and/or reducing their combat effectiveness in accuracy due to moving) If their foolish enough to stay or move really slow the artillery will range in on them and deal massive damage if they were lucky not to be hit in the first few shells directly.
7) This would enable adding tons to the "feel" of the game. shells going off all around 2-4 SPG's working to make a wall of shelling deterring tanks from moving through an area!
8) SPG's direct fire accuracy would have to be lowered considerably that or somehow limit fast reloading to only indirect. Otherwise they would become the ultimate Tank destroyer
9) Last but not least add smoke rounds and SPG's will gain the ability to help units escape or advance by covering a assualt or retreat or helping to block the line of sight of a enemy unit in a defensive position.
Option: You could replace the large area you are targeting with any where within that vehicles "cone" of fire. So anywhere in the guns traverse arc. And you would only lose your ranging in accuracy if your SPG has to track traverse to bring it within its arc. This currently causes your aim to "unfocus" in game right now anyway


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 10:01:11
 
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\Vehicle Comparison\Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23215

View PostWyvernrider, on 12 July 2010 - 05:53 AM, said: You are missing all my logical arguments...
I see what you are trying to say. You just aren't backing it up with justifiable information. I am providing in-game information to support my argument.

MrVic: All tanks have a base amount of what I call "camouflage" (Harder to been spotted due to range and firing your weapon from a concealed position)
when in or behind objects that obscure view to them. The more your exposed the easier you are
spotted by enemy tanks. All tanks have this ability and it can even been improved with modules bought to enhance your tank more.
TD's during previous testing were having issues with being spotted and countered to fast. Patch 0.4.0? I think was when the increase to the
innate level of "camouflage" came into effect. This helped TD's in better servering in their roles as ambushers and snipers.
I can confirm that they have a bonus to their hiding ability. What these values are I do not know, but TD's have a bonus to theirs to aid in their use.
A long time ago in a beta far far away....
TD's were fun to pick off, they would fire and then SPG's fire and every tank in the area would drill them into the ground. Now their like ninjas (15+ ton ninjas mind you)
I think, Most move around cover to cover and change their attack angles and strike hard and fast then relocate to and do it again. I have been within 20 yards
of a TD and not spotted it. He waited, not firing until I passed and then opened up full salvo into my rear armor. (Very bold move banking on his hiding skill) Now if he had fired while I was approaching
I probably would of spotted him. My crew level was mid level and that is why I probably missed spotting him. Regardless their a huge threat and in the last
few days of the Beta I have began writing down the names of those that I know are going to be hard to root out of the bushes and hunt down. My only prayer is
hopping they miss the first shots of their attack.
I currently play a KV-1 with a 107mm Gun. My gun is superior in damage and armor penetration vs many of the TD's in game right now. I am big and my modifiers for
hiding are pretty much between zero and nil. In a heavy tank the one thing I fear most right now on a battlefield is TD's. Heavies I can see and slug it out.
Arty I can absorb or try to avoid. Mediums are mean but I am tough. Lights I can almost ignore. TD's are my bane.......
Hopefully this solves this for all asking :)


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 10:01:11
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23215

View PostWyvernrider, on Jul 12 2010 - 04:53, said: You are missing all my logical arguments...

I see what you are trying to say. You just aren't backing it up with justifiable information. I am providing in-game information to support my argument.


MrVic:

All tanks have a base amount of what I call "camouflage" (Harder to been spotted due to range and firing your weapon from a concealed position)
when in or behind objects that obscure view to them. The more your exposed the easier you are
spotted by enemy tanks.  All tanks have this ability and it can even been improved with modules bought to enhance your tank more.
TD's during previous testing were having issues with being spotted and countered to fast.  Patch 0.4.0? I think was when the increase to the
innate level of "camouflage" came into effect. This helped TD's in better servering in their roles as ambushers and snipers.
I can confirm that they have a bonus to their hiding ability. What these values are I do not know, but TD's have a bonus to theirs to aid in their use.  

A long time ago in a beta far far away....
TD's were fun to pick off, they would fire and then SPG's fire and every tank in the area would drill them into the ground.  Now their like ninjas (15+ ton ninjas mind you)
I think, Most move around cover to cover and change their attack angles and strike hard and fast then relocate to and do it again.  I have been within 20 yards
of a TD and not spotted it.  He waited, not firing until I passed and then opened up full salvo into my rear armor. (Very bold move banking on his hiding skill)  Now if he had fired while I was approaching
I probably would of spotted him.  My crew level was mid level and that is why I probably missed spotting him. Regardless their a huge threat and in the last
few days of the Beta I have began writing down the names of those that I know are going to be hard to root out of the bushes and hunt down. My only prayer is
hopping they miss the first shots of their attack.

I currently play a KV-1 with a 107mm Gun. My gun is superior in damage and armor penetration vs many of the TD's in game right now. I am big and my modifiers for
hiding are pretty much between zero and nil.  In a heavy tank the one thing I fear most right now on a battlefield is TD's.  Heavies I can see and slug it out.
Arty I can absorb or try to avoid. Mediums are mean but I am tough. Lights I can almost ignore. TD's are my bane.......

Hopefully this solves this for all asking :)


MrVic
Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
arrow
12.07.2010 10:01:11
 
Subject: Official Tank Destroyers Discussion
Link on message: #23215

View PostWyvernrider, on Jul 12 2010 - 04:53, said: You are missing all my logical arguments...

I see what you are trying to say. You just aren't backing it up with justifiable information. I am providing in-game information to support my argument.


MrVic:

All tanks have a base amount of what I call "camouflage" (Harder to been spotted due to range and firing your weapon from a concealed position)
when in or behind objects that obscure view to them. The more your exposed the easier you are
spotted by enemy tanks.  All tanks have this ability and it can even been improved with modules bought to enhance your tank more.
TD's during previous testing were having issues with being spotted and countered to fast.  Patch 0.4.0? I think was when the increase to the
innate level of "camouflage" came into effect. This helped TD's in better servering in their roles as ambushers and snipers.
I can confirm that they have a bonus to their hiding ability. What these values are I do not know, but TD's have a bonus to theirs to aid in their use.  

A long time ago in a beta far far away....
TD's were fun to pick off, they would fire and then SPG's fire and every tank in the area would drill them into the ground.  Now their like ninjas (15+ ton ninjas mind you)
I think, Most move around cover to cover and change their attack angles and strike hard and fast then relocate to and do it again.  I have been within 20 yards
of a TD and not spotted it.  He waited, not firing until I passed and then opened up full salvo into my rear armor. (Very bold move banking on his hiding skill)  Now if he had fired while I was approaching
I probably would of spotted him.  My crew level was mid level and that is why I probably missed spotting him. Regardless their a huge threat and in the last
few days of the Beta I have began writing down the names of those that I know are going to be hard to root out of the bushes and hunt down. My only prayer is
hopping they miss the first shots of their attack.

I currently play a KV-1 with a 107mm Gun. My gun is superior in damage and armor penetration vs many of the TD's in game right now. I am big and my modifiers for
hiding are pretty much between zero and nil.  In a heavy tank the one thing I fear most right now on a battlefield is TD's.  Heavies I can see and slug it out.
Arty I can absorb or try to avoid. Mediums are mean but I am tough. Lights I can almost ignore. TD's are my bane.......

Hopefully this solves this for all asking :)


MrVic
How are the developers reviewing fan's suggestions?
arrow
12.07.2010 09:33:08
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\How are the developers reviewing fan's suggestions?
Link on message: #23190

View PostJeremy Taylor, on 11 July 2010 - 07:52 PM, said: All of your suggestions (if reasonable :)) are thoroughly analyzed by developers.

MrVic: I wanted to add to what Jeremy posted :) This is what I tell anyone that is got a good idea and are having troubles getting
it noticed and understood. The better thought out and explanation of "what" you think needs adjusting and examples "why" and ideas of how to adjust things
goes a long way. The in battle occurrence that made you think there is something out of wack is always helpful. It can allow the Devs to find similar fights in
WoT going on and logs of past ones to see how it is matching up.
Rants get ignored but the clearer picture and better explained the more its impact will be.


MrVic
New player problem whit chat
arrow
12.07.2010 09:27:14
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\New player problem whit chat
Link on message: #23183

MrVic: Information on issues found and solutions can be found at http://forum.worldof...hnical-section/
Also this is the area you should post to to faster help regarding your problem :)
Hopefully support can get you up and running soon!


merig00
Gold Per Day
arrow
12.07.2010 06:41:55
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #23096

merig00: In the release you will be able to buy gold for real money and then with gold you can buy premium things.


merig00
Gold Per Day
arrow
12.07.2010 06:41:55
 
Subject: Gold Per Day
Link on message: #23096

merig00: In the release you will be able to buy gold for real money and then with gold you can buy premium things.


merig00
Hints from loading screens
arrow
11.07.2010 21:38:53
 
Subject: Hints from loading screens
Link on message: #22567

View Postotirruborez, on Jul 11 2010 - 12:12, said: msgid "tip85"
msgstr "Compared to other vehicles, tank destroyers are pretty hard to detect."

interesting. i notice no difference in spotting td's or being spotted myself.


merig00: Well that does not apply to Ferdinand :D

Try hiding in large bushes and do not actually turn (travesty your gun left-right) is ok


merig00
Hints from loading screens
arrow
11.07.2010 21:38:53
 
Subject: Hints from loading screens
Link on message: #22567

View Postotirruborez, on Jul 11 2010 - 12:12, said: msgid "tip85"
msgstr "Compared to other vehicles, tank destroyers are pretty hard to detect."

interesting. i notice no difference in spotting td's or being spotted myself.


merig00: Well that does not apply to Ferdinand :D

Try hiding in large bushes and do not actually turn (travesty your gun left-right) is ok


Jeremy Taylor
How are the developers reviewing fan's suggestions?
arrow
11.07.2010 20:52:55
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\How are the developers reviewing fan's suggestions?
Link on message: #22506

Jeremy Taylor: All of your suggestions (if reasonable :)) are thoroughly analyzed by developers.


merig00
W.o.T. videos
arrow
11.07.2010 18:16:48
 
Subject: W.o.T. videos
Link on message: #22289

merig00: You can use only these official videos http://www.youtube.c...dOfTanksCom#p/u


Реклама | Adv