Developers posts on forum

Subject: WCG US Nationals Qualifiers
Link on message: #2499946

Squirrelin, on Aug 21 2012 - 22:59, said: This is true, Yankee 50k gold converts to 20 mil in credits so there is left over gold for sure. One question I have are we allowed to jump in Training Rooms with these accounts, only reason I know is it is strict use on them.

Subject: WCG US Nationals Qualifiers
Link on message: #2499946

Squirrelin, on Aug 21 2012 - 21:59, said: This is true, Yankee 50k gold converts to 20 mil in credits so there is left over gold for sure. One question I have are we allowed to jump in Training Rooms with these accounts, only reason I know is it is strict use on them.

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2499820

utahman, on Aug 21 2012 - 22:55, said: Getting stuck on rocks seems to be an even bigger now that you can just about everywhere. Do you want us to start posting screenshots of the places we get stuck, and if so where should we put them?

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2499786

Sweezie, on Aug 21 2012 - 22:52, said: Still a bunch of glitches, isn't this the whole purpose to NOT get stuck on rocks etc? why do I still get stuck on those little rocks on El (something)

Subject: WCG US Nationals Qualifiers
Link on message: #2499743

Yankee, on Aug 21 2012 - 18:45, said: Oddly, 250k gold, 9 skill Crews, every tank in the game, zero equipment and zero credits
I think these are basically super tester accounts.
( I guess I'll just sell off unneeded tanks)

Subject: WCG US Nationals Qualifiers
Link on message: #2499743

Yankee, on Aug 21 2012 - 17:45, said: Oddly, 250k gold, 9 skill Crews, every tank in the game, zero equipment and zero credits

I think these are basically super tester accounts.

( I guess I'll just sell off unneeded tanks)

Subject: More demanding on graphics card?
Link on message: #2499701

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2499617

KilrBe3, on Aug 21 2012 - 22:33, said: Don't matter. Feedback is feedback. Take note, put it in a folder for later use for Render feedback. But saying don't comment on something that is NEW in this test, along with Physics. Thats just absurd. I still can't believe a CM would even say such a thing. Like I said, you take it as a ty, put it aside for later, and count it as +1 feedback already for when its time to review it.
EDIT:
"As noted in the announcement, the rendering engine is not ready for feedback--it's only partially implemented. Thus the reason we're calling this the physics test."
Thus you still don't understand what I'm trying to say... or what my point was...
Public Relations 101.

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2499571

KilrBe3, on Aug 21 2012 - 22:26, said: Thats absurd to say as a Head CM, any feedback is great feedback, and should always be welcomed with open arms. Anything to make your game a better product, and to expand and learn, learn from the community with, oh I don't know. Feedback.
Your comment disgust me.

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2499516

zmaint, on Aug 21 2012 - 22:16, said: Wow, I get negged for providing honest feedback about the graphics quality..... in the feedback thread. Class crowd on here today.

Subject: Why are there no traiing rooms on Physics Test?
Link on message: #2498405

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2498385

utahman, on Aug 21 2012 - 19:59, said: This patch is so awesome. Watching people fall of the bridge to their death's is hilarious. I'm gonna start recording my matches now. Are we allowed to post the video on YouTube?

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2498148

Maus123, on Aug 21 2012 - 18:47, said: Can a dev please tell us why the maintenance is taking so long?


Jo0minator, on Aug 21 2012 - 19:12, said: queue!

Subject: Flip a tank and receive a prize
Link on message: #2497913

Acewolf1, on Aug 21 2012 - 17:53, said:
With new mechanics!
...
Challenge accepted!

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2497506

kisieltj, on Aug 21 2012 - 18:02, said: I managed to install and play one round before server went down.  Game is VERY laggy. In normal WoT i have ~80FPS(2500k, raedon 7950, 8gb RAM), in Physics test I strugged to get 20FPS. Also you cant buy any new tanks or modules.


SuperJaws100, on Aug 21 2012 - 18:08, said: Well, screw us old computers. Don't give us a patch update so if we want to do the test we will have to uninstall the real client.

Subject: All Star #51
Link on message: #2497455

Subject: All Star #51
Link on message: #2497455

Subject: Flip a tank and receive a prize
Link on message: #2497113

Subject: Flip a tank and receive a prize
Link on message: #2496069

Subject: Physics Test is now!
Link on message: #2496065

Subject: Bison 1/35th Scale Model
Link on message: #2495985

Subject: Ready to quit this game
Link on message: #2494064

White_LegHorn, on Aug 21 2012 - 02:43, said: Well this is like the 3rd time it's happened in a week.. i was in chat the other day and one guy knew i had a lowe.. and a few others..pretty strange.. i;ve changed passwords just now so will see.
actually he named off 3 tanks i had

Subject: The Matchmaker....Wargaming, you aren't done yet!
Link on message: #2493393

Allurai, on Aug 20 2012 - 21:12, said: I don't know whether I am more disappointed in the current MM for t8 Arty or 2 of the most active CMs for our region posting in this thread going 'we have a problem? what problem? its happens very infrequently though, right? no? oh.'
How disconnected from the community are our community managers? Use your Wargaming hax to acquire a t8 Arty, go play pubs during US prime time tonight, and the problem will be vividly clear shortly thereafter.

Subject: The Matchmaker....Wargaming, you aren't done yet!
Link on message: #2493199

IamJohnGalt, on Aug 20 2012 - 00:40, said: When I get home, Ill go though my replays and give you numbers, or the replays if you want.

Subject: Fan Art Spotlight #34
Link on message: #2492197

Subject: Fan Art Spotlight #34
Link on message: #2492197

Subject: Friendly Fire & Team Kill auto system
Link on message: #2491344

CHR157IAN_ALPHA, on Aug 20 2012 - 02:31, said: Id take a vote/kick system over this any day.


SquibRound, on Aug 20 2012 - 07:54, said: Do they not turn blue if they are platooned with the person they killed? I think I read that it doesn't count (though I'm not sure) as team damage if you damage a platoon mate. In a battle tonight, two tanks were platooned and as soon as the battle started, they started shooting each other. When one was dead the other went on suicide run. No one turned blue.

Subject: The New Soviet Tank Destroyers
Link on message: #2490630

Subject: The New Soviet Tank Destroyers
Link on message: #2490630

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490373

supertank3r, on Aug 20 2012 - 17:27, said: What can you tell us about the T54E2 in the skill tree we all saw in the RU 8.0 preview video? Will it be part of a second US medium line or just a transition tank like the KV-13? What tank(s) would lead to research it?
Thanks

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490373

supertank3r, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:27, said: What can you tell us about the T54E2 in the skill tree we all saw in the RU 8.0 preview video? Will it be part of a second US medium line or just a transition tank like the KV-13? What tank(s) would lead to research it?

Thanks

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490373

supertank3r, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:27, said: What can you tell us about the T54E2 in the skill tree we all saw in the RU 8.0 preview video? Will it be part of a second US medium line or just a transition tank like the KV-13? What tank(s) would lead to research it?

Thanks

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490331

dzaric, on Aug 20 2012 - 17:20, said: Is WG still working on the mercenaries concept for CW or has the idea been completely dropped?

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490331

dzaric, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:20, said: Is WG still working on the mercenaries concept for CW or has the idea been completely dropped?

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490331

dzaric, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:20, said: Is WG still working on the mercenaries concept for CW or has the idea been completely dropped?

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490316

ulrikov, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:32, said: What is WG's plan on the E-100's role (aside from Gold Thrower)?
It certainly is not an HP sponge (maus does a better job with its armour), it barely does any damage against Tier X tanks due to low pen, it's slow, it's not a brawler since it has the most obvious/easiest frontal weakspot (even bigger than IS4's driver hatch)... I mean, what would be the rationale for WG's buffs pathway for the E-100 if it's role is "unclear/undetermined" as known by most players.
Would it be plausible if the E-100 would get just a 5mm (that's +2.5%) pen increase and we'll see how the statistics go from that point (to prevent it from being an "Imperial Death Star")?
With the current changes coming along, it's nearly impossible to kill any Tier X HT head on (except French) since weakspots are really difficult to aim (and aiming for weakspots is just the way to go for a 235mm pen gun with 0.4 accuracy).
What are the armour thickness for the new IS4M hull? Would there be an increase in side space armour for the IS4M as it now has skirts?


Blitzkrieger, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:38, said: this here valter
http://forum.worldof...m-the-ru-forum/
concerning arty getting nerfed


Maus123, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:59, said: You said that the Renault G1R would be in 7.4, but it never came, where is it?


WarStore, on Aug 20 2012 - 17:01, said: With all due respect, but you are kidding, right?
Just by looking at the stats for 15cm on E-100, you can tell it is not meant to snipe. And even it was meant to snipe, the game mechanics and map design doesn't allow it.
Jpz-E100 suffers from the same problem. It is not a natural progression from JTiger.
Leaving E-100 to underperform for many patches is acceptable. Making the changes that everyone has been asking for months that might make it overperform (and I have my doubts) for one patch is not acceptable?

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490316

ulrikov, on Aug 20 2012 - 15:32, said: What is WG's plan on the E-100's role (aside from Gold Thrower)?

It certainly is not an HP sponge (maus does a better job with its armour), it barely does any damage against Tier X tanks due to low pen, it's slow, it's not a brawler since it has the most obvious/easiest frontal weakspot (even bigger than IS4's driver hatch)... I mean, what would be the rationale for WG's buffs pathway for the E-100 if it's role is "unclear/undetermined" as known by most players.

Would it be plausible if the E-100 would get just a 5mm (that's +2.5%) pen increase and we'll see how the statistics go from that point (to prevent it from being an "Imperial Death Star")?

With the current changes coming along, it's nearly impossible to kill any Tier X HT head on (except French) since weakspots are really difficult to aim (and aiming for weakspots is just the way to go for a 235mm pen gun with 0.4 accuracy).

What are the armour thickness for the new IS4M hull? Would there be an increase in side space armour for the IS4M as it now has skirts?



Blitzkrieger, on Aug 20 2012 - 15:38, said: this here valter
http://forum.worldof...m-the-ru-forum/
concerning arty getting nerfed



Maus123, on Aug 20 2012 - 15:59, said: You said that the Renault G1R would be in 7.4, but it never came, where is it?



WarStore, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:01, said: With all due respect, but you are kidding, right?

Just by looking at the stats for 15cm on E-100, you can tell it is not meant to snipe. And even it was meant to snipe, the game mechanics and map design doesn't allow it.
Jpz-E100 suffers from the same problem. It is not a natural progression from JTiger.

Leaving E-100 to underperform for many patches is acceptable. Making the changes that everyone has been asking for months that might make it overperform (and I have my doubts) for one patch is not acceptable?

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2490316

ulrikov, on Aug 20 2012 - 15:32, said: What is WG's plan on the E-100's role (aside from Gold Thrower)?

It certainly is not an HP sponge (maus does a better job with its armour), it barely does any damage against Tier X tanks due to low pen, it's slow, it's not a brawler since it has the most obvious/easiest frontal weakspot (even bigger than IS4's driver hatch)... I mean, what would be the rationale for WG's buffs pathway for the E-100 if it's role is "unclear/undetermined" as known by most players.

Would it be plausible if the E-100 would get just a 5mm (that's +2.5%) pen increase and we'll see how the statistics go from that point (to prevent it from being an "Imperial Death Star")?

With the current changes coming along, it's nearly impossible to kill any Tier X HT head on (except French) since weakspots are really difficult to aim (and aiming for weakspots is just the way to go for a 235mm pen gun with 0.4 accuracy).

What are the armour thickness for the new IS4M hull? Would there be an increase in side space armour for the IS4M as it now has skirts?



Blitzkrieger, on Aug 20 2012 - 15:38, said: this here valter
http://forum.worldof...m-the-ru-forum/
concerning arty getting nerfed



Maus123, on Aug 20 2012 - 15:59, said: You said that the Renault G1R would be in 7.4, but it never came, where is it?



WarStore, on Aug 20 2012 - 16:01, said: With all due respect, but you are kidding, right?

Just by looking at the stats for 15cm on E-100, you can tell it is not meant to snipe. And even it was meant to snipe, the game mechanics and map design doesn't allow it.
Jpz-E100 suffers from the same problem. It is not a natural progression from JTiger.

Leaving E-100 to underperform for many patches is acceptable. Making the changes that everyone has been asking for months that might make it overperform (and I have my doubts) for one patch is not acceptable?

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2489626

ulrikov, on Aug 19 2012 - 15:18, said: Can you confirm that the IS-4 is getting its driver's hatch removed as it will become an IS-4M variant in the upcoming 8.0?
If this is true, I believe you'll be giving the IS4 a clear advantage whereas the German E-100 is utterly limited only to HP buff and Traverse increase buff (based on WG interview RU), which is barely useless...
One more thing, why is the E-100 not getting any Pen buff on the 15cm?
I mean, why do the devs think accuracy buff (with RoF nerf) is a better upgrade when the E-100 wasn't intended to snipe?
Or if its not getting any Pen Buff at all, would it be possible that the 15cm get deadly accuracy (since it can't penetrate anything except on aiming weakspots)... by deadly accuracy, I mean like 0.3 accurate (with 3rpm RoF, same aiming time, no HP buff)?


ArtV, on Aug 19 2012 - 15:27, said: So help me understand.  You are taking the PZ4 which has a great sniping gun and a nicely armored turret from the front and no other advantages and removing both?  This is a slight reworking?  So this will be a slow moving lightly armored (lowest tier 5 medium armor from the sides and rear which is important given its speed) medium?  Just want to make sure I understand because it looks like you are removing all the positives of that tank and keeping the negatives and labeling it a 'slight' reworking.
I really do not believe that the tank is significantly OP.  Look at the speed and traverse, it is horrible.  
Why do you feel the need to immediately address any alleged GermanPZ4 balance issues immediately?  The KV and KV3 were significantly OP for what, 2 years?
Thanks and I am sorry for any bitter tone.
ArtV


LehrCommander, on Aug 19 2012 - 15:47, said: Why is it that it seems Russian tanks are getting more exp than German tanks for doing the same or similar things?
Ex: I shot an IS-7 down to 50% health in my KT earlier and died, getting only 200~ exp. I then shot an IS-3 in my KV-3 and then was killed, receiving 600~ exp. Why is this?


Thuringen, on Aug 19 2012 - 17:03, said: Thx for the answers
Q What are the difference between the actual hull of the IS-4 and the new IS-4M hull ?


kaaz, on Aug 19 2012 - 17:18, said: With all the new premium tanks now available in almost all Tiers, do you intend on implementing a limit for the numbers of premium tanks in standard battle?
I have had a match playing an IS-3 that I have worked very hard to obtain and 10 of my teammate had premium tanks... Not to say that those 10 tanks where the first to die with the other team loosing none. Now, more then often, I am in match with more and more premium tanks... Giving a big tank to someone who have no clue on how to play give a great advantage to the opposing force.
Thanks for reading my comment.
Sebastien


Dinyne, on Aug 19 2012 - 17:34, said: If you have already answered this sorry, the threads kinds long to go read through tho. I was just wondering if your team felt that the T-43 was too easily ammo racked? On my 34-85 I can hardly recount more than maybe 4 or 5 total ammo racks by the time I had researched everything and had unlocked my T-43. After playing maybe 15k experience worth of games on my T-43 I have already topped that number, it seems like every other death is ammo-rack related.


PaoSan, on Aug 19 2012 - 19:51, said: Hello, I've read this post for some time and I did not see my question therefor I guess it has not been asked,
Could it be possible to make a  Video clip on how to use the french light tank line a bit the same as you did for the type-62 when it came on sale? Because since 7.5 got out, all the amx 1375,90 got boosted up 1 tier and now people dont understand what those  little things can do, I get in alot of tier 10 matches and it dosent bother me because those little ones can compete in those kind of match ( its hard ) . But alot of public players dont understand that being even if it is a light tank it Cannot be played like a t-50-2,Chaffee, Elc as a suicidescout.  I do understand the fact it has the litlle light dot on it but its like the m3 lee its a medium tank yet you have to play it as a Tank Destroyer, So could you help understand new and older player that the new french line cannot be considered scouts even if they are light ?
thx alot


Otto_matic_Reiffel, on Aug 19 2012 - 20:21, said: That's actually a huge buff. Better than a camo net for anything with less than 20% base camo (ie, nearly everything) and on permanently (for gold). Makes a camouflaged Maus hide almost as well as an IS-7.
Any reason why this one is additive whereas the rest of the camo bonuses like camo nets are multiplicative? Seems that it's going to be pretty much mandatory on any competitive tank.


Khanwulf, on Aug 19 2012 - 21:03, said: Couple of questions, which you might consider rephrased suggestions if you wish:
1) Any plans to include the German PAW 600 (Panzerabwehrwerfer 600, officially designated 8H63) or its intended successors (10cm, 12cm), which were intended for some of the E-series lighter vehicles?  Seems like this gun would be tailor-made for WoT, since while it would be an accurate HE-howitzer (recoilless rifle, really), it would really only shine with gold HEAT rounds.
2) Any chance of getting an indicator of the number (let alone type) of installed modules on tanks in the hanger screen?  Finding the equipment to swap to a new vehicle can be annoying....
Thanks
--Khanwulf


Statless_QQ, on Aug 19 2012 - 21:12, said: 1) Do you have any plans to add a second heavy tree for the U.S.A or a third heavy line for the germans?
2) Will any maps be added in future updates (8.1 etc) or will you continue to rework the current maps?
3) Are you planning to make track or radio upgrades visible on the tank?
Thanks.


NinjaBullet, on Aug 19 2012 - 21:48, said: I have another question.
Since you guys are adding more new perks/skills in the future (well thats what I heard) are you going to reset all the skills on all our tanks again, just like what you did when you introduded the new skills and perks in 7.2 update?


AcesHighMDP, on Aug 19 2012 - 22:48, said: Vallter, are you planning to do anything about troll platoons ? Please don't tell me that MM compensates when a team gets 2 tier 1s platooned with a tier 10. Every single time the match ends with 3 or 4 team kills, and everybody hates it except the trolls that do it. At the very least, they should wait in line until there's another platoon to put on the opposite team.


The_Choosen1, on Aug 20 2012 - 02:26, said: Vallter,
1.The T-28 F-30 85MM gun was removed in 7.5 right? a Free xp compensation was done even it could be equipped on the KV-1 and the KV-3 and some others, then why the Panzer IV L/70 gun doesn't gets  compensated ?
2. I heard arty is recieving a nerf in general in 8.0, can you explain me what it is?
3. With the new pyshics, If I Ram an IS-3 by the side in my KT and make him flip over, he will die, but will I get the full kill xp and creds?

Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2489626

ulrikov, on Aug 19 2012 - 14:18, said: Can you confirm that the IS-4 is getting its driver's hatch removed as it will become an IS-4M variant in the upcoming 8.0?

If this is true, I believe you'll be giving the IS4 a clear advantage whereas the German E-100 is utterly limited only to HP buff and Traverse increase buff (based on WG interview RU), which is barely useless...

One more thing, why is the E-100 not getting any Pen buff on the 15cm?

I mean, why do the devs think accuracy buff (with RoF nerf) is a better upgrade when the E-100 wasn't intended to snipe?

Or if its not getting any Pen Buff at all, would it be possible that the 15cm get deadly accuracy (since it can't penetrate anything except on aiming weakspots)... by deadly accuracy, I mean like 0.3 accurate (with 3rpm RoF, same aiming time, no HP buff)?



ArtV, on Aug 19 2012 - 14:27, said: So help me understand.  You are taking the PZ4 which has a great sniping gun and a nicely armored turret from the front and no other advantages and removing both?  This is a slight reworking?  So this will be a slow moving lightly armored (lowest tier 5 medium armor from the sides and rear which is important given its speed) medium?  Just want to make sure I understand because it looks like you are removing all the positives of that tank and keeping the negatives and labeling it a 'slight' reworking.

I really do not believe that the tank is significantly OP.  Look at the speed and traverse, it is horrible.  

Why do you feel the need to immediately address any alleged GermanPZ4 balance issues immediately?  The KV and KV3 were significantly OP for what, 2 years?

Thanks and I am sorry for any bitter tone.

ArtV



LehrCommander, on Aug 19 2012 - 14:47, said: Why is it that it seems Russian tanks are getting more exp than German tanks for doing the same or similar things?
Ex: I shot an IS-7 down to 50% health in my KT earlier and died, getting only 200~ exp. I then shot an IS-3 in my KV-3 and then was killed, receiving 600~ exp. Why is this?



Thuringen, on Aug 19 2012 - 16:03, said: Thx for the answers

Q What are the difference between the actual hull of the IS-4 and the new IS-4M hull ?



kaaz, on Aug 19 2012 - 16:18, said: With all the new premium tanks now available in almost all Tiers, do you intend on implementing a limit for the numbers of premium tanks in standard battle?
I have had a match playing an IS-3 that I have worked very hard to obtain and 10 of my teammate had premium tanks... Not to say that those 10 tanks where the first to die with the other team loosing none. Now, more then often, I am in match with more and more premium tanks... Giving a big tank to someone who have no clue on how to play give a great advantage to the opposing force.

Thanks for reading my comment.

Sebastien



Dinyne, on Aug 19 2012 - 16:34, said: If you have already answered this sorry, the threads kinds long to go read through tho. I was just wondering if your team felt that the T-43 was too easily ammo racked? On my 34-85 I can hardly recount more than maybe 4 or 5 total ammo racks by the time I had researched everything and had unlocked my T-43. After playing maybe 15k experience worth of games on my T-43 I have already topped that number, it seems like every other death is ammo-rack related.



PaoSan, on Aug 19 2012 - 18:51, said: Hello, I've read this post for some time and I did not see my question therefor I guess it has not been asked,

Could it be possible to make a  Video clip on how to use the french light tank line a bit the same as you did for the type-62 when it came on sale? Because since 7.5 got out, all the amx 1375,90 got boosted up 1 tier and now people dont understand what those  little things can do, I get in alot of tier 10 matches and it dosent bother me because those little ones can compete in those kind of match ( its hard ) . But alot of public players dont understand that being even if it is a light tank it Cannot be played like a t-50-2,Chaffee, Elc as a suicidescout.  I do understand the fact it has the litlle light dot on it but its like the m3 lee its a medium tank yet you have to play it as a Tank Destroyer, So could you help understand new and older player that the new french line cannot be considered scouts even if they are light ?

thx alot




Otto_matic_Reiffel, on Aug 19 2012 - 19:21, said: That's actually a huge buff. Better than a camo net for anything with less than 20% base camo (ie, nearly everything) and on permanently (for gold). Makes a camouflaged Maus hide almost as well as an IS-7.

Any reason why this one is additive whereas the rest of the camo bonuses like camo nets are multiplicative? Seems that it's going to be pretty much mandatory on any competitive tank.



Khanwulf, on Aug 19 2012 - 20:03, said: Couple of questions, which you might consider rephrased suggestions if you wish:

1) Any plans to include the German PAW 600 (Panzerabwehrwerfer 600, officially designated 8H63) or its intended successors (10cm, 12cm), which were intended for some of the E-series lighter vehicles?  Seems like this gun would be tailor-made for WoT, since while it would be an accurate HE-howitzer (recoilless rifle, really), it would really only shine with gold HEAT rounds.

2) Any chance of getting an indicator of the number (let alone type) of installed modules on tanks in the hanger screen?  Finding the equipment to swap to a new vehicle can be annoying....

Thanks
--Khanwulf



Statless_QQ, on Aug 19 2012 - 20:12, said: 1) Do you have any plans to add a second heavy tree for the U.S.A or a third heavy line for the germans?

2) Will any maps be added in future updates (8.1 etc) or will you continue to rework the current maps?

3) Are you planning to make track or radio upgrades visible on the tank?

Thanks.



NinjaBullet, on Aug 19 2012 - 20:48, said: I have another question.
Since you guys are adding more new perks/skills in the future (well thats what I heard) are you going to reset all the skills on all our tanks again, just like what you did when you introduded the new skills and perks in 7.2 update?



AcesHighMDP, on Aug 19 2012 - 21:48, said: Vallter, are you planning to do anything about troll platoons ? Please don't tell me that MM compensates when a team gets 2 tier 1s platooned with a tier 10. Every single time the match ends with 3 or 4 team kills, and everybody hates it except the trolls that do it. At the very least, they should wait in line until there's another platoon to put on the opposite team.



The_Choosen1, on Aug 20 2012 - 01:26, said: Vallter,

1.The T-28 F-30 85MM gun was removed in 7.5 right? a Free xp compensation was done even it could be equipped on the KV-1 and the KV-3 and some others, then why the Panzer IV L/70 gun doesn't gets  compensated ?
2. I heard arty is recieving a nerf in general in 8.0, can you explain me what it is?
3. With the new pyshics, If I Ram an IS-3 by the side in my KT and make him flip over, he will die, but will I get the full kill xp and creds?